18 Commits (feature/host-bootstrap)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
nexxo	5883989552	Give settings the shape a settings page actually has ... Four attempts, and this is what was wrong with the last one: full-width panels stacked down the page, each carrying its own title INSIDE it. Every group had two frames — the title bar and the border — so the page read as a column of long boxes with nothing saying where one topic ended and the next began, and a phone number got a field a thousand pixels wide. The shape now: - **A section list on the left**, sticky, so the sections stay reachable however far a form runs. Below `lg` it becomes a scrolling strip of chips, because a vertical list on a telephone is four rows of nothing. Under it, who is signed in — on a shared office machine that is a real question, and a settings page is where it gets asked. - **A content column of 820px**, not the whole 1240 shell. - **The heading OUTSIDE the card it belongs to.** A section is a heading, a sentence, and then a card of rows. That single move is what stops them reading as boxes: the border now frames the fields, not the topic. - **What cannot be undone is last, in a card whose border says so** — the deletion deadlines and the close button together, at the foot of the contract section, in danger colours. The rows are unchanged (label left, control right) and so is every binding; what changed is the frame around them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 17:59:16 +02:00
nexxo	2a97d76b2d	Rebuild the settings page out of panels and rows ... **The withdrawal was invisible in two different ways.** It rendered only while the fourteen days were still running, so the moment they expired the whole block vanished — indistinguishable from a feature nobody built. And the account it was looked for on has no contract at all: no package, no subscription, nothing to withdraw from, so there was never anything for it to be about. It is now a row for every CONSUMER who has a contract, open or not: while it runs, the deadline and the button; afterwards, the sentence saying why it is over. A business never sees it — WithdrawalRight answers that, and Settings::withdraw() refuses them again on the server. And an account with no package says so and offers the packages, instead of a dead sentence in a box. **The page is built out of two pieces now.** x-ui.panel is a group: a card with a header that names it. x-ui.row is a setting inside it: what it is on the left, the control on the right, dividers between rows. That is the shape every settings page worth copying uses, and it is the shape that uses the width — a 280px label column with the control beside it fills the line, where a stack of full-width inputs leaves two thirds of it empty and a grid of cards of different heights walks down the screen as a staircase. All four tabs are rebuilt on it, so the page reads as one designed thing rather than four pages that happen to share a tab bar. Below `sm` the rows stack, because on a telephone a label belongs above its field. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 17:38:57 +02:00
nexxo	18193a731d	Stop asking for a signature the law does not want, and lay out the tab ... **The owner is right about the agreement.** Art. 28 wants a CONTRACT, not a ceremony — and a contract is concluded by incorporating the agreement into the terms the customer accepts at checkout, which is exactly how every hoster they have bought from does it. Nothing in the regulation asks for a second, separate click. What it does ask is that the agreement is in writing (electronic form included, Art. 28(9)), that it is the version in force, and that the customer can obtain it. So: the terms now say the agreement is part of the contract and needs no separate signing, and name where it is. The card states that rather than flagging the customer as outstanding — the warning chip is gone. The button stays, reworded to "Zusätzlich bestätigen": a practice or a firm that gets audited often wants an explicit record, and it costs a click. The console's counter says how many confirmed rather than how many are "open", because none of them are. **The contract tab was a staircase** — a short card, a wide one spanning both columns, then a short one again. It is one column of full-width sections now, each with the same shape: a header row carrying the state and its action, then the body. Nothing tracks sideways any more. The package section states its own state in the header instead of a paragraph in the body, the withdrawal sits under it as a row rather than a second card, and the agreement's four files each have a button — reading and keeping, agreement and measures, which the single "Herunterladen" could not express. Also: the generated version no longer carries "Aus dem Repository erzeugt (clupilot:publish-dpa)" in the console's list. That is the command line, not information. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 17:30:55 +02:00
nexxo	52aacddc56	Store the agreement where the web process can actually read it ... Every link on the agreement page answered 404 — the download visibly, the two inline ones just as dead — and nothing anywhere said why. The files were there, whole and correct. An artisan run inside a container is root; PHP-FPM is www-data. Laravel's local disk creates a PRIVATE directory, which is 0700, so `dpa/` came out as root-only. The web process could not enter it, `Storage::exists()` answered false, and the routes did exactly what they were told: abort 404. No exception, no log line, a page full of links to nothing. Both writers — the command and the console's upload form — now store with "public" visibility, which is the file MODE and nothing to do with the web: 0755/0644 instead of 0700/0600. The disk's root is outside the document root either way, and the two routes still check who is asking. The command also warns if a file it just wrote is not readable, because the alternative is finding out from a customer. The download itself now looks like one: the `download` attribute on both anchors, and in the console a bordered control rather than a third link in a row of two. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 17:19:39 +02:00
nexxo	d04ea712c7	Write the processing agreement and its annex, and let it be downloaded ... The mechanism shipped without a document. Both are here now, generated from this repository rather than uploaded — so the company is named from CompanyProfile exactly as the invoices name it, the sub-processor list is the three places customer data really leaves this application, and the deletion deadlines are read off the commands that enforce them. A wording change is a diff somebody can review, not a file that appears. `clupilot:publish-dpa 1.0` renders both to PDF (TCPDF, the engine the invoices already use), stores them on the private disk and puts them in force; `--draft` stops short of that. The console's upload form is untouched: a lawyer's revision arrives as a PDF and becomes a version like any other. **The annex says what this installation does, not what it would like to.** Every measure in it was checked against the code first — the isolation is one VM per customer because that is what provisioning builds, the backup is a daily snapshot job at 02:00 because that is what RegisterBackup creates, the deletion deadlines are the two prune commands. Claims the system does not currently keep are NOT in the document, and they are named in the handover instead. A TOM that promises more than the machine does is the document an auditor reads before looking. **Downloading** now carries the version in the filename — CluPilot-AV-Vertrag-1.0.pdf — so "which fassung did I agree to" is answerable from a downloads folder months later without opening anything. Both sides get the button; inline stays the default, because a contract is read before it is filed. Placeholder register data is left off the document rather than printed: a "FN 000000a" on a contract looks like a real number and is not one. Also: the wordmark scan tripped on a paragraph whose first word is the company name, for the second time. It now looks for the name as the whole CONTENT of an element, which is what a lockup is, rather than for the name after a tag, which is also how a sentence starts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 17:12:30 +02:00
nexxo	955f1b874f	Deliver the processing agreement, and hold the proof it was accepted ... Art. 28(3) GDPR wants a contract wherever personal data is processed on somebody else's behalf, which is the whole of what this product does. "In writing" there includes electronic form (Art. 28(9)), so a document the customer can read plus a recorded acceptance is enough — no signature on paper. The website already promises "AV-Vertrag inklusive", which means it has to be obtainable without asking us for it. It was not obtainable at all. **The text is never this application's.** An operator uploads the document their lawyer wrote, names the version, and publishes it; the measures ride along as a second file, because they are an annex to the agreement and "which measures applied when this customer accepted" has to have one answer. Inventing the text here would have been worse than having none. **Uploading and publishing are two acts.** Acceptance is per version, so publishing leaves every customer who accepted the previous one outstanding again — correct, and far too expensive to trigger by dropping a file on a form. It goes through a confirmation modal that says exactly that (R23). **The customer's side** is a card in the contract tab: read the agreement, read the measures, one press to conclude it. What that press records is what makes it evidence rather than a flag — the version, the moment, the address it came from, and the login that pressed. Pressing twice is one agreement (unique index, not a check somebody can forget), and a superseded acceptance is kept rather than overwritten: it was true when it was made, and the history is the point. Nothing renders until a version is in force. A card offering an agreement that does not exist is worse than the silence. The files live on the private disk and are served through routes that check who is asking — an agreement is not a public asset, and a guessable URL to one would be a list of who our customers are. The customer route takes no version parameter: which document applies is ours to say. `dpa.manage` is its own capability on the OPERATOR guard. Whoever keeps the platform running does not thereby decide what every customer is asked to agree to — and a capability written under `web` since the 2026-07-29 move lands in a guard nothing authenticates against, which is how this one first shipped answering 403 to a role that visibly had it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 16:56:57 +02:00
nexxo	1056dddc62	Take the address by field, fix the customer type, ask why they leave ... **The billing address was one textarea**, so what landed in it was whatever somebody typed: a postcode on the street line, a city with no postcode, no country at all. It is four fields now — street, postcode, town, country — in the customer's settings and in the console's customer editor, which had its own free-text copy of the same field and would have had an operator's correction silently reverted the next time the customer saved. `customers.billing_address` is neither dropped nor parsed: guessing which line of an existing block is the street would put a postcode where a street belongs on a document nobody can correct afterwards. It becomes the COMPOSED form, rewritten from the fields on every save, so IssueInvoice and everything else that reads it keep working, and a record nobody has re-saved keeps the block it always had. **The customer type is fixed once it is on record.** It decides the fourteen-day right of withdrawal, and a business able to set itself to "Privatperson" on this page is a business able to withdraw from a contract it may not withdraw from. Registration asks the question; this page reports the answer, and saveProfile refuses to answer it a second time — in the component, not by hiding a radio, because a form that hides a control has never stopped anybody who can post to /livewire/update. A record created before the question existed may still be given one, once. The panel is a fact rather than a form now, which is also what was odd about it, and the sentence about who has the right of withdrawal is gone. **Cancelling asks why.** A reason from a fixed list, required, with a note beside it that "Sonstiges" cannot go without — the one fact worth having about a departure, asked at the only moment the customer is looking at the question. It lands on the contract (`cancel_reason`, `cancel_reason_note`). And where the fourteen days are still running, the dialogue offers the WITHDRAWAL as a way out of itself rather than as one more reason inside it: withdrawing ends the service the same day and sends the whole amount back, cancelling keeps the term that was paid for, and somebody entitled to the first should not lose it by taking the second unasked. A business is never offered it — WithdrawalRight answers that, not the template. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 16:41:32 +02:00
nexxo	1d4e98eb06	Rebuild the customer's settings page as four tabs ... It was one column 768 pixels wide inside a 1240-pixel shell — a third of the window empty beside it — holding everything a customer might ever change: the company address, their password, two-factor, the devices they are signed in on, the branding of their cloud, the contract, and the button that closes the account. Two thousand pixels of scroll, and the way to a particular thing was knowing how far down it lived. Four tabs, by what somebody came to do: their details, security, the appearance of their cloud, the contract. The same tab bar the console uses, so one vocabulary holds on both sides of the login, and the choice lives in the query string — `#[Url(history: true)]`, no `except`, so the parameter is there from the first render and a link to this page can name the part it means. An unknown tab out of the address falls back to the first rather than rendering a settings page with no section on it. The width is used now. Inside a tab the short cards sit side by side instead of each taking a full row to hold three lines: the customer type beside the company form (it is one question, and beside the VAT field it was mistaken for it), the password beside two-factor, the logo beside the colours, the contract beside the closing of the account. Also: the subtitle listed the old sections by name. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 16:25:10 +02:00
nexxo	fed4acf31c	Accept terms instead of a start date, and fix the sender no server accepts ... **The test mail was rejected: "553 5.7.1 Sender address rejected: not owned by user no-reply@…".** Every purpose mailbox here has its own SMTP account, and a mail server lets an account send only from the address it owns. Mail::to() hands back a pending mail bound to the DEFAULT mailer and sendNow() then ignores the mailer the mailable asked for, so a mail addressed support@ went out over the no-reply@ login. It sends through the mailable's own mailer now, and the cloud-ready preview — the one mailable with no mailbox at all — takes the provisioning mailbox like the real notification does. Writing the test for that found the same bug in production code: **InvoiceMail and OrderConfirmationMail set their From to billing@ and never named a mailer**, so both went out over mail.default's no-reply@ login. On this installation no customer had ever received an invoice mail or an order confirmation; they rendered perfectly, queued without complaint and were refused at the door. MailSenderOwnershipTest now scans for the mismatch: a mail that takes a mailbox From must use that mailbox's mailer. **The box on the order page accepts the terms now**, not an immediate start. It used to carry the whole FAGG §16 sentence, which read like a choice between "now" and "in fourteen days" — and there is no second option. The terms are what regulate the sale, so they had to exist: resources/views/legal/terms.blade.php replaces the placeholder with fourteen sections written from what this software actually does — the delivery, the capacity queue, the full refund on withdrawal, the cancellation at period end, the deletion deadlines. The company data comes from CompanyProfile, so the page and the invoices cannot drift. No availability figure and no liability cap has been invented. No order goes through without it: the button is unusable until the box is ticked and says why, and CheckoutController still refuses server-side — the browser half refuses nothing. The request field is `terms_accepted`; the Stripe metadata key stays `immediate_start`, because a session opened before a deploy is paid after it and the webhook would find nothing under a new name. **"Wird der Account nach fünf Tagen gelöscht?"** Only an unconfirmed one. That was the whole of what we said, so the answer looked like yes. The second rule now exists and is stated: PruneDormantAccounts removes a confirmed account after a year when it never had a package — no customer record at all, which is where every order, contract and seven-year invoice hangs. A fortnight's notice goes out first, once, and `dormant_warned_at` is what permits the deletion: an account whose warning never went out is never removed. Signing in resets the clock, measured off the device rows because users has no last_login_at. Both deadlines are said in the portal settings, on the verification page, and in the terms — each reading the number off the command that enforces it. Also: the wordmark scan matched any element whose text merely BEGINS with the company name, which a paragraph of terms does. It looks for the lockup form now (no whitespace after the tag), which is what it was always about. The seven checkout tests in the parallel session's files were posting the old field name and now post the new one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 15:22:35 +02:00
nexxo	6d7c2bdf35	Ask whether they are a consumer, and let one change their mind ... Three things the product owed its customers and did not have. **Who is on the other side.** There was no consumer/business flag anywhere, and `vat_id` was standing in for one — which it cannot: a business without a VAT number is an ordinary small business, and a consumer with one does not exist. It is asked at sign-up now, correctable in the portal, and NULL where nobody has been asked. Unknown is read as CONSUMER everywhere it decides a right, because that mistake costs us a refund while the other one takes a statutory right away from somebody who has it. Reverse charge asks the recorded type instead of the number: an explicit consumer is charged the domestic rate whatever `vat_id` says — previously they were not, and anyone could zero their own VAT by getting a number verified. An unrecorded type still falls back to the verified number, so no contract that is already running changes rate. **The fourteen-day right of withdrawal** (FAGG, §312g BGB), for consumers only, at every door: the window is stamped on the contract when it is concluded, the customer exercises it from the portal, an operator records one that arrived by telephone or post, and both go through one action that refuses a business customer on the server rather than by hiding a card. The money follows the paperwork rather than being computed beside it. The invoice is cancelled by a Storno with its own gapless number — nothing is ever edited or deleted — a new invoice states the pro-rata value of the service actually delivered (FAGG §16, by days over the term paid for), and the refund is exactly the difference between the two documents. Where the consumer never expressly asked for the service to begin at once, they owe nothing and the whole amount goes back. `StripeClient::refund()` is new, keyed so a retry cannot send the money twice. The service ends through EndInstanceService and the `cancellation_scheduled` machinery that was already there. **The cancel button for modules.** BookAddon::cancelAtPeriodEnd() had no caller in the interface at all, so a customer could book a recurring charge in two clicks and had no way to stop it. It is on the module card now, with the date it runs until and a way back while the cancellation is still pending — and putting a module back settles nothing, because the term it was cancelled for was paid for in advance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 21:06:06 +02:00
nexxo	07141a96bf	Show where an account is signed in, and let it sign the other places out ... Completes the device work: the warning mail now has somewhere to send people. A warning whose only advice is "if this was not you, take action" names a problem and hands back nothing to do about it. Both sides get their own component rather than one shared with the guard passed in. Operators and customers are two guards and two tables (R21) — a component taking the guard as input is one forged property away from listing and ending the other side's sessions. Every query in SessionRegistry is scoped by guard as well as by id for the same reason, and three tests hold that line, because the unscoped version looks exactly like a working feature while doing it. TouchLoginSession keeps each row pointing at the session it describes. Both sign-in paths raise the Login event BEFORE session()->regenerate(), so the row is written against an id that is dead a moment later — and the once-a-minute throttle would have held the correction back for the first minute of every session, hiding the session its reader is sitting in. A changed id is therefore never throttled. A session counts as live only if the framework's row exists AND was touched within the session lifetime. The join alone is not enough: Laravel collects expired sessions by lottery, so on a quiet installation rows sit there for days and the list would offer somebody a laptop they shut last month. Ending the others goes through the product's own modal (R23) and leaves the asking session alone: signing somebody out of the page they are using to sign other people out is not what the button says. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-28 23:38:17 +02:00
nexxo	973fcb3f2d	Replace native confirm() dialogs with the app's own modal pattern	2026-07-28 19:34:27 +02:00
nexxo	bd779f00e5	Show times on the operator's clock, keep storing them in UTC ... The console announced an update for "spätestens um 15:21" while the clock on the wall said 17:21. Not a formatting slip in one string: fourteen views and four components printed database values straight out, so every absolute time in the product was two hours out all summer and one hour out all winter. Two of those views looked as though they had handled it. They called ->timezone(config('app.timezone')) which reads like "convert to local time" and, app.timezone being the STORAGE zone that must stay UTC, converts to UTC — a no-op wearing the costume of a fix, which is worse than no call at all because it stops the next person looking. That exact string is now banned by test. Worse than the labels were two FORMS. Maintenance windows and plan versions filled their datetime-local fields from UTC and parsed what came back as UTC. A datetime-local field carries no offset — it is the digits a person reads off their own clock — so an operator typing 21:00 scheduled a window for 23:00 their time, and nothing anywhere said so. App\Support\LocalTime now holds toField() and fromField() side by side, because getting one end right is not half a fix, it is a fresh bug. The mechanism is one Carbon macro, ->local(). It copies before converting: Illuminate\Support\Carbon is mutable, so without that, rendering a timestamp would rewrite the model attribute as a side effect and anything comparing or saving it afterwards would be an hour or two out. Both Carbon classes get the same body — Carbon keeps macros in one global table, so the second registration replaces the first for every Carbon class, and two different bodies meant the immutable version, safe for itself, silently became the mutable one's implementation too. My own test caught that. The existing tests had not caught any of this because they built their expected values with the same wrong call the views used — a test that recomputes the implementation asserts nothing. They now assert the wall clock, and the queued update additionally asserts that the UTC time is NOT shown. Recorded as R19 in CLAUDE.md and enforced by tests/Feature/DisplayTimezoneTest: no Blade or Livewire component may format an absolute time without ->local(), the UTC no-op is banned, storage stays UTC, both sides of the DST boundary are checked, ->local() must not mutate, and a form field must round-trip to the same instant. APP_DISPLAY_TIMEZONE, default Europe/Vienna. 615 tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-27 17:32:21 +02:00
nexxo	435a202fdd	Match the panel to the approved template, measured rather than assumed ... The panel had been built by reading the template and believing the result. Every round of review found the same class of defect, so this round the template was rendered in a browser and measured with getComputedStyle, and the implementation measured the same way — two number columns instead of an opinion. That immediately settled a disagreement: a review of the template's SOURCE said the metric grid used a 20px gap. Rendered, it is 14px. The measurement wins. Brought to the template's figures: label 11.5px (it was 11px in three separate places, which is how it drifted — it is now one .lbl rule), value tracking -0.02em, unit weight 450, metric row 6px above and 14px between, page head centred with a 14px gap, grid gap 14px, columns switching at 1101/561px and the h1 at 901px to match the template's own breakpoints, ring 62px, bar 5px. The shared button now takes its height from min-height (40px) rather than vertical padding, at 14px/600 with 0 18px padding and a 10px radius — a button keeps its height whatever sits inside it, icon, spinner or bare text. Also here, from the same round of review: - The chart's blue border was Tailwind's own `ring` utility colliding with a component class of the same name. Renamed to `.metric-ring`. This was dismissed once as a screenshot artefact; it was real. - Page titles lost the `sm:text-3xl` (40px) an earlier bulk edit had appended to 23 of them. The template's h1 is 30px. - The users table has its actions back — edit, suspend, lock and delete — for every seat that is not the owner, with the owner refused in the action itself and not merely hidden in the markup. DemoCustomerSeeder writes one complete customer as real rows: instance, subscription, six seats across four roles, a backup, current-period traffic and thirty days of samples with a deliberate wobble and one day at 286/288 checks. Nothing in the panel is drawn from a fixture any more, so anything missing shows up as missing. Removing the demo is one deletion. Verified: 607 tests, and a Codex comparison of the two measurement sets — "a person would call them the same design", the only difference a 1px gap. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-27 17:08:05 +02:00
nexxo	21d8dc310a	One definition of the navigation, and the country instead of the building ... The breadcrumb said Übersicht on every page. The sidebar and the breadcrumb each built their own copy of the structure, so the layout had no way to know which entry was current and fell back to the first one. Navigation::portal() and ::console() are now the single definition, and currentLabel() matches on the route name — which matters for the console, whose PATH changes between host-bound and fallback mode while its route names do not. The datacentre name is out of everything a customer sees, for the third time and now at the source rather than in a template. Falkenstein is how an operator places an instance; a customer's processing record names the jurisdiction, and putting the building in customer copy means editing that copy every time the estate grows. Also swept the views onto the new scale: --text-faint is 2.8:1 and a decoration token, but it was carrying table headers, hints and timestamps — text people have to read. All of it moved to --muted, which is 5.0:1 and passes AA. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-27 16:09:39 +02:00
Claude	f6b9181ed8	Give customers two-factor, and stop every button on the settings page reacting at once ... Clicking Save made every button on the console's settings page appear to fire. Seven `wire:loading.attr="disabled"` had no `wire:target`, and without one Livewire applies the loading state to ANY request on the component — so one save put all of them into their disabled state simultaneously. Each names its own action now. Two-factor for customers. Fortify's endpoints already existed; only the screen was missing. Setting up requires re-entering the password first, and every action re-checks that server-side rather than relying on the button not being on screen — a Livewire action is reachable by anyone who can post to /livewire/update. The confirmation marker is Laravel's own session key, so it and the framework's password.confirm middleware mean the same thing rather than drifting apart. The secret never enters a Livewire property. Component state travels to the browser and back in the snapshot; the QR image is derived from the secret, the secret is not in it — and there is a test that says so. The status page moves to the ROOT of its hostname: status.clupilot.com/status says the same word twice. That needed the domain-bound `/` registered BEFORE the landing page, because Laravel takes the first match and the landing route is host-agnostic — so the status host would have served the marketing site. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-27 08:48:34 +02:00
Claude	935c9ae6ac	Let people change their own password, and a location be switched off while editing it ... Three gaps, all of the "half-built" kind. Nobody could change a password. Fortify's updatePasswords feature was switched off, so an account created with a generated password kept it until someone opened a shell on the server — including the owner's own. Both settings pages have the form now, sharing one concern, because two copies of a password rule is how one of them ends up weaker. It goes through Fortify's own action rather than hashing here, and the current password is required: an unlocked machine should not be two keystrokes away from locking its owner out. The datacenter edit form had no active switch. The column and the scope existed, and the list page has a toggle — but the form you open to change the thing did not offer the one lifecycle action a location actually needs. Switching one off now says what it does NOT do: existing hosts keep running. Once, on the actual transition, and as the only message — the generic "saved" toast would otherwise replace it, and an already-inactive location would have announced its own deactivation every time its name was edited. The staff table's actions cell is empty for your own row, because you cannot revoke yourself. With a one-person team the column was therefore always blank and read as broken rather than as a rule. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-27 07:49:07 +02:00
nexxo	df10448e5d	feat(portal): settings page — company profile, branding (logo+colors), cancel package, close account ... - customers gain profile + branding + closed_at; instances gain cancellation fields; branding resolver (NULL -> CluPilot defaults) snapshotted into the provisioning run context - cancel package: term-end, irreversible, typed-confirm modal (R5) - close account: guarded (no active package), typed-confirm modal (R5) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-25 14:36:52 +02:00