3 Commits (feature/host-bootstrap)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
nexxo	c354ad1463	Make mails readable on a phone, and let an operator look at one ... Three things the owner reported, and one sentence that promised something this product does not do. **The mails had a fixed width.** components/mail/layout.blade.php set width="600" and width:600px, so every phone showed a 600px canvas in a 390px window and one had to scroll sideways to read a sentence. Now the table is width="100%" with max-width:600px — fluid, with 600 as a ceiling rather than a floor. A mail cannot fix this with a media query (Outlook renders with Word and drops <style> blocks), which is why the whole file is inline attributes and why the shrinking has to be built in. Side padding went 40px -> 24px in the layout and in all nine mail views: 40 each side leaves 278px of a 390px screen to read in. **There was no way to look at a mail.** An invoice mail needs an invoice, a maintenance announcement needs a window, and "register an account to see whether the confirmation reads well" is not a workflow — which is how the fixed width survived for months. App\Services\Mail\MailPreviews builds all nine from sample data, every record with make() and never create(), so a preview leaves no invoice, order or window behind and draws no number from a series. Two ways to see one: in a tab as the document itself, or sent to the signed-in operator's own address. There is no recipient field — that would be a form for mailing strangers. sendNow(), not send(): every mailable here implements ShouldQueue, and send() defers to the queue for those, which would have put a failure in a worker's log while the button reported success to somebody waiting for the mail. The test caught that. **The booking page had no shell.** Order declared layouts.portal — the bare shell the sign-in pages use, no navigation and no padding — so the page sat flush against the top and bottom of the window with no way back to anything. layouts.portal-app, like every other portal page. **The consent box said something untrue.** Its refusal read "otherwise we can only build your cloud once the withdrawal period has ended", which describes a path that does not exist: nothing here delivers fourteen days later, and an unticked box simply means no order. Said plainly now, and said on the page before somebody runs into the refusal. Also: GrantedPlanPortalTest asserted assertDontSee('179'), which matches any id containing those digits — and ids climb through a suite run because a rolled-back transaction does not reset an auto-increment counter. It passed alone and failed in company. Asserts on '179,00' now, which is what a leaked price would actually look like. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 14:50:37 +02:00
nexxo	0e25fe88d4	Keep a register of what was sent, and answer the customer from here ... Three complaints, one shape: the console knew things and could not act on them, so the work happened somewhere else and left no trace. The header said "4 Hinweis(e)" and led nowhere. Whoever read it had to know that the list was a card further down the same page, and then go looking for the host or the failed run by hand. The count is a link now, every notice carries the page that shows the thing it is about, and the plural is a word rather than a bracket. Nothing recorded what this installation had sent. "Hat der Kunde die Zugangsdaten je bekommen, und wann?" was answered on the mail server — a different machine, a different program, and nothing an operator can put in front of somebody who says nothing ever arrived. Every mail now writes a row: when, to whom, which mailable, and the customer it belongs to. Written from MessageSent, so a row means the transport accepted it; that is the strongest thing an application can honestly claim, and a column called "delivered" would be pretending otherwise. Verification and reset mails are left out on purpose — they go to unconfirmed addresses and anybody who can type into a form can send them, so recording them would hand the register to whoever wants to fill it. And the customer list was the end of the road. There is a page behind it now: what they bought, what they asked in their own words, what we sent them, and a box to write the next message. It goes out from the support mailbox and is recorded on the way — with its body, because an operator typed it and "what exactly did I write to them in March" is a question the mail server's log cannot answer either. Answering a request from here closes it, which is the reason to answer from here at all: answering from a mail client leaves it open for ever, because nothing tells it otherwise. Found on the way, by a test that sent a real mail rather than asserting it was queued: resources/views/mail/reset-password.blade.php was missing its closing </x-mail.layout>. The component's contents were never terminated, the layout's own @if ran off the end of the file, and the mail raised a Blade syntax error instead of rendering. Password reset has therefore never delivered a link since it was built. Closed, plus a test that renders it and one that counts opening against closing tags across every mail view. Reading INCOMING mail in the console is not in this: it needs the mailbox polled over IMAP, which is a credential and a dependency. Requests filed through the portal appear here in full; a customer who writes by mail instead still has to be read in the mail client. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 21:02:36 +02:00
nexxo	3a4324fb6f	Give people a way back in, and put the URL in English ... ── The hole ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── There was no password reset. Fortify's feature was commented out, so there was no link on the sign-in form, no page and no route — a customer who forgot their password was locked out of their own cloud until somebody opened a shell. On a product whose selling point is that you can ring somebody, that is a support call a week and an embarrassing one. Two pages of ours under Fortify's route names (R1/R2), because with views off Fortify registers only the POST endpoints. The mail is a Mailable in this product's design rather than the framework's MailMessage: somebody who has just been locked out is exactly the person a phishing mail is aimed at, and a message that looks nothing like the rest of our post is one they cannot check — ours carries the footer that names our domains. Three decisions worth stating, each with a test: The answer is identical whether the address is known or not. "No account with that address" turns the form into a way of finding out who is a customer. The reset kills every other session. Whoever knew the old password may still be signed in somewhere, and a reset that leaves them there has fixed nothing. It does NOT sign the visitor in. The link arrived by email, and a mailbox somebody else can read would otherwise be a session somebody else gets. ── /sicherheit → /security ───────────────────────────────────────────────── R13: paths are English. Mine was not. The old path stays as a permanent redirect because it has already gone out in mail footers. ── One wordmark ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── "Sometimes it says Cloud and sometimes it does not" — correct. It was on the footer, the placeholder and the maintenance screen, and absent from the header, the sidebar and the sign-in plate. The product is called CluPilot Cloud; that is the name on the invoices and in every mail, so it is now the name everywhere. The console sidebar takes the small size so the lockup, the ADMIN badge and the close button still share one line (R18). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 16:50:29 +02:00