2321854 removed it. That commit's own work — discarding an unconfirmed
registration and sweeping abandoned ones — is untouched and correct; what went
with it was every file of the Stripe price adoption merged an hour earlier:
AdoptStripePrice, IdempotencyKey, the unique-index migration, both test files,
the spec, the plan, and the edits in six more.
Nothing was lost. The commits stayed in history and the files stayed on disk,
untracked, which is what a staged deletion from a stale tree leaves behind.
Restored from 4eb90c8, the reviewed head, by explicit path — the fourteen paths
2321854 damaged and not one more, so the ten files that commit legitimately
added or changed keep exactly what it gave them.
This is the failure the repo's own rule exists to prevent: stage by path, never
`git add -A`, because a second session's index does not know what a first one
merged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
"Abmelden und neu registrieren" was advice that could not work. Signing out
frees nothing: the address is still held by the unique index, so registering
again with the address somebody meant fails — and every abandoned attempt
stayed in `users` for ever. Reported exactly that way, and it was right.
The button discards the account instead. Only an UNCONFIRMED one, and only
one with nothing behind it: the webhook creates a customer's login from a
paid checkout, so a user can sit on this page unconfirmed while already
having a contract, and deleting that is data loss dressed up as a
convenience. It refuses and says where to go. A confirmed account is closed,
not discarded — that is ConfirmCloseAccount, with an invoice history behind
it.
R23: confirmed in a modal. The modal mutates nothing; it dispatches the event
the page listens for, so the checks stay in the one place they already are
rather than being duplicated where they could drift.
And nothing has to be discarded by hand. clupilot:prune-unverified removes
registrations nobody confirmed after five days — long enough for somebody who
signed up on a Friday and found the mail in a spam folder on Monday, short
enough that a typo does not hold the correct address for a month. It skips a
confirmed account whatever its age, and any account with a customer record
behind it, matched on user_id AND on the address, because either link means
somebody is a customer. Every removal is logged with the address: a line that
disappears is what somebody asks about later, and a count answers nothing.
The deadline is said on the page as well as in the mail. Somebody who never
received the mail is looking at the page, and the deadline is the reason they
do not have to do anything about an attempt they abandon.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
IdempotencyKey::forPrice()/forProduct() built the parameter array they
fingerprint, and FakeStripeClient::createPrice()/createProduct() rebuilt the
identical array literal by hand purely to feed replay()/rememberKey(). Nothing
tied those two literals together — a later change to what a Price call
fingerprints could drift from what the fake checks for a collision, and no
test would catch it, because the HttpStripeClient tests exercise forPrice()
alone and the FakeStripeClient tests exercise its own local array alone.
priceParameters()/productParameters() are now the one answer to "what counts
as the same call"; forPrice()/forProduct() and the fake both ask it instead of
each keeping their own copy. Fingerprint and key format are unchanged — this
is the duplication coming out, not new behaviour. refund(),
cancelSubscription(), addSubscriptionItem() and createCheckoutSession() are
untouched: their local parameter arrays are the fake's own record of the call,
never fingerprinted into a key, so there was nothing to duplicate there.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A key says "I already sent this call", not "this is what the object is". The
catalogue calls sent metadata that the key knew nothing about, so adding the
tax_treatment field in 9da1358 poisoned yesterday's key for a day — and
AddonPrices::ensure() runs inside a customer's module booking, not only in the
sweep.
createPrice and createProduct now fold a fingerprint of their parameters into
the key. refund, cancelSubscription, addSubscriptionItem and the checkout
deliberately do not: there a second object is the customer's money taken twice,
and Stripe's refusal is the thing worth keeping.
The fake could not see any of this. Its ledger replayed the first id for a
repeated key without ever comparing what the second call asked for.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
nexxo