7 Commits (main)
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
d04ea712c7 |
Write the processing agreement and its annex, and let it be downloaded
The mechanism shipped without a document. Both are here now, generated from this repository rather than uploaded — so the company is named from CompanyProfile exactly as the invoices name it, the sub-processor list is the three places customer data really leaves this application, and the deletion deadlines are read off the commands that enforce them. A wording change is a diff somebody can review, not a file that appears. `clupilot:publish-dpa 1.0` renders both to PDF (TCPDF, the engine the invoices already use), stores them on the private disk and puts them in force; `--draft` stops short of that. The console's upload form is untouched: a lawyer's revision arrives as a PDF and becomes a version like any other. **The annex says what this installation does, not what it would like to.** Every measure in it was checked against the code first — the isolation is one VM per customer because that is what provisioning builds, the backup is a daily snapshot job at 02:00 because that is what RegisterBackup creates, the deletion deadlines are the two prune commands. Claims the system does not currently keep are NOT in the document, and they are named in the handover instead. A TOM that promises more than the machine does is the document an auditor reads before looking. **Downloading** now carries the version in the filename — CluPilot-AV-Vertrag-1.0.pdf — so "which fassung did I agree to" is answerable from a downloads folder months later without opening anything. Both sides get the button; inline stays the default, because a contract is read before it is filed. Placeholder register data is left off the document rather than printed: a "FN 000000a" on a contract looks like a real number and is not one. Also: the wordmark scan tripped on a paragraph whose first word is the company name, for the second time. It now looks for the name as the whole CONTENT of an element, which is what a lockup is, rather than for the name after a tag, which is also how a sentence starts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
fed4acf31c |
Accept terms instead of a start date, and fix the sender no server accepts
**The test mail was rejected: "553 5.7.1 Sender address rejected: not owned by user no-reply@…".** Every purpose mailbox here has its own SMTP account, and a mail server lets an account send only from the address it owns. Mail::to() hands back a pending mail bound to the DEFAULT mailer and sendNow() then ignores the mailer the mailable asked for, so a mail addressed support@ went out over the no-reply@ login. It sends through the mailable's own mailer now, and the cloud-ready preview — the one mailable with no mailbox at all — takes the provisioning mailbox like the real notification does. Writing the test for that found the same bug in production code: **InvoiceMail and OrderConfirmationMail set their From to billing@ and never named a mailer**, so both went out over mail.default's no-reply@ login. On this installation no customer had ever received an invoice mail or an order confirmation; they rendered perfectly, queued without complaint and were refused at the door. MailSenderOwnershipTest now scans for the mismatch: a mail that takes a mailbox From must use that mailbox's mailer. **The box on the order page accepts the terms now**, not an immediate start. It used to carry the whole FAGG §16 sentence, which read like a choice between "now" and "in fourteen days" — and there is no second option. The terms are what regulate the sale, so they had to exist: resources/views/legal/terms.blade.php replaces the placeholder with fourteen sections written from what this software actually does — the delivery, the capacity queue, the full refund on withdrawal, the cancellation at period end, the deletion deadlines. The company data comes from CompanyProfile, so the page and the invoices cannot drift. No availability figure and no liability cap has been invented. No order goes through without it: the button is unusable until the box is ticked and says why, and CheckoutController still refuses server-side — the browser half refuses nothing. The request field is `terms_accepted`; the Stripe metadata key stays `immediate_start`, because a session opened before a deploy is paid after it and the webhook would find nothing under a new name. **"Wird der Account nach fünf Tagen gelöscht?"** Only an unconfirmed one. That was the whole of what we said, so the answer looked like yes. The second rule now exists and is stated: PruneDormantAccounts removes a confirmed account after a year when it never had a package — no customer record at all, which is where every order, contract and seven-year invoice hangs. A fortnight's notice goes out first, once, and `dormant_warned_at` is what permits the deletion: an account whose warning never went out is never removed. Signing in resets the clock, measured off the device rows because users has no last_login_at. Both deadlines are said in the portal settings, on the verification page, and in the terms — each reading the number off the command that enforces it. Also: the wordmark scan matched any element whose text merely BEGINS with the company name, which a paragraph of terms does. It looks for the lockup form now (no whitespace after the tag), which is what it was always about. The seven checkout tests in the parallel session's files were posting the old field name and now post the new one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
17a6fabcc2 |
One wordmark, one typeface, and the address the server actually issues
tests / pest (push) Failing after 11m28s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 19s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Reported as "logo and font are different everywhere" — maintenance page, customer panel, console, homepage. They were. Counting them up: the site header set the name in ink at -0.02em, the sidebar split it into "Clu" plus an orange "Pilot", the sign-in plate set it white at a third size, the customer two-factor page set it in MONO with no mark at all, the error pages and the placeholder each inlined their own — and the maintenance screen had no wordmark whatsoever. Nine surfaces, seven ideas of the brand. There is one now: resources/views/components/ui/brand.blade.php. Mark plus wordmark in one piece, in ink, with an optional muted "Cloud". No orange half — that made the accent a permanent fixture instead of something used sparingly. The four places that cannot use a Blade component (the two self-contained pages, the error layout, the mail layout) inline it and are held to the same shape by a test. The typeface. The console loads IBM Plex through Vite; the 503 page has no stylesheet at all, so the maintenance screen — the one page shown when somebody is already worried — was rendering in the system sans. It declares the fonts itself now. And the bold weight was missing from public/fonts entirely: the placeholder and the error pages both asked for ibm-plex-sans-latin-700-normal.woff2, which was not there. A @font-face pointing at nothing fails silently, which is why nobody noticed. The error pages carried the same two faults the placeholder shipped with: an empty gradient tile where the mark belongs, and `gap` on an inline-flex row spacing "Clu", "Pilot" and "Cloud" apart as three separate words. And the price sheet promised "Adresse auf clupilot.cloud" — a domain the company does not own — while provisioning was issuing addresses under whatever CLUPILOT_DNS_ZONE says. It is assembled from that setting now, the same reason the prices are read from the catalogue rather than typed into the page. welcome.blade.php removed: Laravel's leftover, reachable from no route. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
4755a4f362 |
Redesign the pre-launch placeholder, and fix its wordmark and mark
tests / pest (push) Failing after 8m7s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 20s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Reported from a phone on status.clupilot.com, which serves this page because the site is still switched to private. Two real defects behind the complaint: The wordmark read "Clu Pilot Cloud". `gap` on a flex container applies between EVERY child and a bare text node is a child — so an inline-flex row wrapped around "Clu", <i>Pilot</i> and " Cloud" put nine pixels between each of them. The wordmark is one element now and the gap only ever separates it from the mark. The logo was a plain gradient tile with nothing in it, which reads as an image that failed to load. That is a poor thing to leave somebody with on a page whose whole message is "we are building this properly". The real mark — cloud plus autopilot ascent — is inlined; it has to be in the file because this page renders when the asset build may not exist at all. The redesign itself: the card is gone. The page is now a centred composition on the open ground — the state as a pill above everything, the mark, the headline at the size the rest of the site uses, and the three promises the paragraph was already making set as their own line so there is something to look at besides one block of text. One warm bloom behind it, drawn as a gradient rather than a blurred disc, which banded into visible rings. Still self-contained, and still the only page exempt from the shared stylesheet: it is served mid-deploy and on a fresh install, where @vite would throw instead of rendering the reassurance somebody came for. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
b85df4c141 |
Rebuild the status page as a status page
Asked for after looking at how real ones are built. The shape they all share is a convention, and a convention is what lets somebody find the answer without being taught the page: banner, components each with ninety days of uptime, then the written record underneath. This page had only the banner — the version that is of no use the morning after, because "Alle Dienste in Betrieb" is true and says nothing to somebody who was locked out the evening before. Three things are new. The ninety-day bar. It cannot be reconstructed after the fact: the monitoring table holds the last verdict per instance, not a history. So a sampler (clupilot:sample-status, every five minutes beside the monitoring sync) writes counts into one row per component per day, and the page divides them. A day with no row is drawn as a gap and says "nicht aufgezeichnet" — never green. Degraded samples count as reachable in the percentage but still colour the day: folding them into downtime reports a slow morning as an outage, ignoring them loses the only trace of it. The incident record. An operator reports a disruption in the console, posts updates as it develops, and the entry that says "behoben" is the same action that closes it — two separate steps is how a page ends up with a resolved note under an incident that still reports as ongoing. There is deliberately no way to edit an update: it is a statement made at a time, corrections are a further entry. An open incident may make a component look worse than the probes found it, never better. Scheduled maintenance, from the windows the console already keeps rather than a second list somebody has to remember to fill in. The measurement moved out of the controller into ServiceHealth, shared with the sampler, so the banner and the bars cannot disagree about what "healthy" means. The page now uses the shared design system and the site's header and footer. Its self-contained stylesheet was there to survive a broken asset build; it does not survive one — if the stylesheet cannot be served the application serving this page is already failing, and mid-deployment every route answers with the maintenance page. What the exemption bought was a third design nobody maintained. Found while building: durationMinutes had its operands the wrong way round, and diffInMinutes is signed, so the public page printed "Dauer -86 Minuten". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
696c8834b8 |
Redesign the public website instead of recolouring it
tests / pest (push) Failing after 8m15s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 22s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Correctly rejected: the last pass was the old page in new paint. It kept the skeleton — eight numbered sections, a split hero, a twelve-row comparison matrix — and changed only the palette. A palette is not a design. What is actually different now: - The § numbering is gone. Numbered sections with a drawn rule are a document convention, and the document voice is exactly what the product's design system dropped. - The hero shows the product instead of describing it: centred type, then a wide panel built from the real console's own tokens, cropped by the section below. The old hero put a table of facts beside the headline, so a visitor read two columns before seeing anything. - Six identical cards, then six more, then six more became one asymmetric grid — a large panel, a dark tile, an accent tile, a wide module row — so the important thing is allowed to be bigger than the rest. - The industries are one dense two-column list instead of six cards repeating each other's shape. - The page has one dark hinge in the middle (the deployment) rather than a dark section among seven light ones. - The evidence table became rows that pair the measure with the piece of paper you can hand somebody, which is what it is for. - Prices are cards, with the full matrix folded away underneath. The matrix used to be the first thing a visitor met: twelve rows of ticks before a single price was legible. - The FAQ heading sits still while the questions scroll past it. - The footer is a real footer. The header is a floating bar rather than a full-width band, and opaque in both states — translucency plus backdrop-blur reads as a rendering fault over the dark panels that scroll under it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
43d58de7f8 |
Rebuild the public website in the shared design system
Reported plainly: the site is still in the old style. It was — it was the last of the three surfaces the token file describes that had never been converted. landing.blade.php carried its own complete design system inside a <style> block: warm paper, IBM Plex Serif headlines, 3px corners, its own scale of greys, written before the tokens existed. Somebody who clicked "Anmelden" left one company and arrived at another. The page now draws from resources/css/portal-tokens.css like the portal and the console: same surfaces, same radii, same button hierarchy, same small-caps label, one family at weight 700 instead of a serif. What still differs is rhythm, which is what a marketing page is allowed to differ in. Content is unchanged. New: components/layouts/site.blade.php holds the header and footer for every public page, and legal.blade.php uses it too — the imprint used to be a stranded card in a third style again. Two things found on the way: - .lbl set `color: var(--muted)`, which is not a token. An undefined var() in `color` computes to `unset`, so every small-caps label on every surface was whatever colour its container happened to be. - The big figures were set in mono. Mono gives the decimal comma a full glyph cell, so "99,95" read as three separate numbers. coming-soon and the status page stay self-contained on purpose — both are served when the application may not have a built stylesheet at all. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |