17 Commits (156de12c8ce3fe6806be2db8fa182969b03a0816)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
nexxo	1056dddc62	Take the address by field, fix the customer type, ask why they leave ... **The billing address was one textarea**, so what landed in it was whatever somebody typed: a postcode on the street line, a city with no postcode, no country at all. It is four fields now — street, postcode, town, country — in the customer's settings and in the console's customer editor, which had its own free-text copy of the same field and would have had an operator's correction silently reverted the next time the customer saved. `customers.billing_address` is neither dropped nor parsed: guessing which line of an existing block is the street would put a postcode where a street belongs on a document nobody can correct afterwards. It becomes the COMPOSED form, rewritten from the fields on every save, so IssueInvoice and everything else that reads it keep working, and a record nobody has re-saved keeps the block it always had. **The customer type is fixed once it is on record.** It decides the fourteen-day right of withdrawal, and a business able to set itself to "Privatperson" on this page is a business able to withdraw from a contract it may not withdraw from. Registration asks the question; this page reports the answer, and saveProfile refuses to answer it a second time — in the component, not by hiding a radio, because a form that hides a control has never stopped anybody who can post to /livewire/update. A record created before the question existed may still be given one, once. The panel is a fact rather than a form now, which is also what was odd about it, and the sentence about who has the right of withdrawal is gone. **Cancelling asks why.** A reason from a fixed list, required, with a note beside it that "Sonstiges" cannot go without — the one fact worth having about a departure, asked at the only moment the customer is looking at the question. It lands on the contract (`cancel_reason`, `cancel_reason_note`). And where the fourteen days are still running, the dialogue offers the WITHDRAWAL as a way out of itself rather than as one more reason inside it: withdrawing ends the service the same day and sends the whole amount back, cancelling keeps the term that was paid for, and somebody entitled to the first should not lose it by taking the second unasked. A business is never offered it — WithdrawalRight answers that, not the template. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 16:41:32 +02:00
nexxo	8ca0d4d257	Say the same thing to the customer, the register and the bank ... Five places where the product told somebody a figure that nothing behind it produced. **The invoice page showed five invoices nobody was ever issued.** A mock that outlived its purpose: CP-2026-0003 to CP-2026-0007, a prefix belonging to no configured series, all "paid", a spend curve from 179 to 198 € and a next charge of 198 € on 01.08.2026 — behind ['auth','verified','customer.active'], so every signed-in customer saw it. Their real invoices existed in `invoices`, were rendered as PDFs and mailed to them, and appeared nowhere in the portal at all. The page now lists their own documents, newest first, with the numbers, dates and totals off the frozen snapshot, a Storno marked as one, and a download. The PDF route resolves the document against the signed-in customer in the query — a URL anybody can type is not made private by not printing it. No next charge and no chart: nothing here computes what Stripe will take next cycle, and a figure nobody has worked out is worse than a blank space. **The setup fee was quoted everywhere and charged nowhere.** On the price sheet, on the booking page, set by the operator in the console — and CompanyProfile::setupFeeCents() had no reader outside the two sentences that quoted it. It is charged now, as a second non-recurring line on the same checkout session, which Stripe puts on the initial invoice only. `orders.setup_fee_cents` records how much of the charge it was, so the whole total still goes back on a withdrawal while the register holds the PACKAGE's charge against the contract price and the invoice prints the fee as a line of its own. The booking page was also quoting the fee NET under the same sentence the website quotes GROSS — 99,00 against 118,80 — and now quotes what will be taken. **An upgrade click cancelled a booked downgrade and delivered nothing.** Nothing in this application marks a cart order paid, so the customer traded a downgrade they had genuinely booked for a cart line that would never be fulfilled. The booking now stands until the upgrade actually lands on the contract, where ApplyPlanChange clears it. The fulfilment seam is reachable for every type that can be paid — a module and a storage pack book through BookAddon, which was the missing path from a paid order to a SubscriptionAddon and left AddonPrices, SyncStripeAddonItems and clupilot:end-cancelled-addons with no caller behind a payment. A paid traffic pack logs an error rather than pretending: the metered allowance is a standing count of packs while a top-up is sold for one month, and which of the two is meant is not a guess to make here. That no path to `paid` exists yet is now stated in both places rather than in one. **The proof register called correct charges wrong.** expected_gross_cents used the CUSTOMER's rate, which is zero under reverse charge, against the domestic gross Stripe actually took — so matches_catalogue was false for every EU business sale charged exactly the advertised amount, and for every renewal on a contract with a module, which was held against `price_cents` alone. It compares against TaxTreatment::chargedCents() and against the whole term now. Where no money moved, charged and the flag are null instead of the expected figure agreeing with itself, and a plan change records the terms with the pro-rata figures in the snapshot rather than money that arrives again on Stripe's proration invoice. **The seller's own VAT id was on the invoice, unlabelled**, between the register number and the court. Labelled — and the footer's composition moved out of the TCPDF method, because inside one the only way to read what it says is to render a PDF and un-subset its fonts. One test enshrined a figure the code does not produce: a reverse-charge purchase recorded with no charged amount, asserting 17900/0/17900, where OpenSubscription always passes the charged figure and a real one records 21480/0/21480. Another asserted that an upgrade click cancels a booked downgrade. Full suite: 1676 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 01:30:24 +02:00
nexxo	8440266ed3	Stop charging for a service that has ended ... Nothing in this application could cancel a Stripe subscription — there was no such method on the client at all. So a customer who cancelled and a consumer who withdrew both stayed subscribed, the card went on being charged every month, and every one of those payments arrived as invoice.paid, drew a real number out of the gapless Austrian series and mailed the PDF, for a machine that had been switched off. Indefinitely. StripeClient::cancelSubscription() closes the first half, with the timing passed explicitly at the call site — CANCEL_AT_PERIOD_END for a cancellation, because the customer keeps the term they paid for, and CANCEL_IMMEDIATELY for a withdrawal, because that unwinds the contract and the whole amount has just gone back. The immediate form states prorate and invoice_now as false rather than inheriting them: a credit note of Stripe's beside our own Storno would be the same money twice. The second half is ApplyStripeBillingEvent::owesADocument(). Refusing every invoice on a cancelled contract would lose the legitimate final one — the cycle for a term the customer really did use, unpaid, dunned for three weeks and settled after the contract ended. So the question is not when the payment landed but what it is for: an invoice whose billed period STARTED before the contract ended is documented, one whose period begins at or after that moment is not. Neither is a contract marked cancelled with no date, nor an invoice with no period, because a number handed out in error can never be withdrawn while a missing document can still be issued. The register entry is written either way — the money moved, and that is where an operator finds what has to go back. A cancellation also took its date from the order date plus MONTHS, whatever the term said, so a yearly customer who cancelled in March lost the nine months they had already paid for. It reads current_period_end now, which Stripe keeps current for both terms; the month-walk survives only for a machine with no contract behind it, where nothing records a term at all. Stripe is asked first and our rows are written only if it agreed: a cancellation we could not make effective is the defect above wearing a "gekündigt" label on the settings page, and a cancellation has no deadline, so being asked to try again costs nobody anything. A withdrawal cancelled the OPENING invoice only, found by invoices.order_id — which a renewal and a module document leave null on purpose. A storage pack booked on day three and withdrawn from on day ten was therefore neither cancelled nor refunded. Every charge inside the window is covered now, one Storno per document and one refund per payment, each against the payment that actually took it: a single refund of the total against the opening PaymentIntent is what Stripe would have refused for exceeding it, and one idempotency key for the whole withdrawal would have had Stripe replay the first refund's answer for the second. StartCustomerProvisioning::resume() opened a missing contract and returned, and the only production call to IssueInvoice::forOrders() is after the order commits — so a worker killed in between cost that customer their invoice for good, silently, with nothing anywhere sweeping for it. resume() finishes that work too, guarded by the invoice already filed against the order and by invoices.sent_at, so however often Stripe redelivers it comes out as one invoice, one number, one mail. The order confirmation stays on the first pass alone: it has nothing to stamp. subscriptions.cancel_requested_at is new because the billing half of the application had no way to tell a cancelled contract from an untouched one. Deliberately not a status: until the term runs out this is a paying customer, which is the distinction EndInstanceService is built around, and `cancelled_at` beside it still means the day it genuinely ended. clupilot:verify-vat-ids is scheduled monthly on the first, and its docblock no longer points at a note in routes/console.php that never existed. Reverse charge rested on a one-off VIES answer, a withdrawn registration keeps earning rate 0 for ever, and the unpaid VAT on those invoices is the seller's — so the cadence is the width of that window, and the first of the month is the rhythm the return is filed on. Two tests that proved nothing are now about behaviour. SettingsTest asserted service_ends_at was not null, a column the code had just written and which the broken monthly arithmetic satisfied exactly as well as the right answer; it states the yearly date, the contract's own record and the order to Stripe. EndInstanceServiceTest travelled to whatever value the implementation had computed, so it recomputed the code instead of checking it, and never looked at billing at all; the boundary is a literal date now and the money stopping is asserted beside the address coming down. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 00:52:19 +02:00
nexxo	f02e86769b	Charge the price the website shows, and hand a withdrawal back in full ... Stripe was charging the catalogue's NET figure while the document added the domestic rate on top: a customer quoted 214,80 paid 179,00 and was then invoiced for VAT nobody had collected. Under para 11(12) UStG that VAT is owed to the tax office whether or not it ever arrived, so every document issued created a liability against revenue that did not contain it. The Stripe Price now carries the GROSS figure. price_cents stays net - it is frozen onto every contract and PlanChange prorates against it, so redefining it would corrupt every pro-rata sum ever computed. Only the amount at the till moved, and it is formed by the one call TaxTreatment already answers for the price sheet and for the invoice, so displayed, charged and invoiced cannot drift apart. Stripe's automatic_tax is deliberately not used. TaxTreatment is the single tax authority here, and a second rate computed by Stripe would take 19 % from a German consumer while our document said 20 %. A Stripe Price cannot be edited, so a changed figure means a new Price and the old one archived - which stops it being SOLD and leaves every subscription already on it billing the old amount for ever. stripe:reprice-subscriptions is the second half, and a command of its own because it touches live money. A withdrawing consumer is refunded in full, as the owner decided. That is more generous than FAGG para 16 requires, and it makes the express-request consent the statute hinges on irrelevant - so the gate is gone rather than left looking load-bearing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 22:42:02 +02:00
nexxo	6d7c2bdf35	Ask whether they are a consumer, and let one change their mind ... Three things the product owed its customers and did not have. **Who is on the other side.** There was no consumer/business flag anywhere, and `vat_id` was standing in for one — which it cannot: a business without a VAT number is an ordinary small business, and a consumer with one does not exist. It is asked at sign-up now, correctable in the portal, and NULL where nobody has been asked. Unknown is read as CONSUMER everywhere it decides a right, because that mistake costs us a refund while the other one takes a statutory right away from somebody who has it. Reverse charge asks the recorded type instead of the number: an explicit consumer is charged the domestic rate whatever `vat_id` says — previously they were not, and anyone could zero their own VAT by getting a number verified. An unrecorded type still falls back to the verified number, so no contract that is already running changes rate. **The fourteen-day right of withdrawal** (FAGG, §312g BGB), for consumers only, at every door: the window is stamped on the contract when it is concluded, the customer exercises it from the portal, an operator records one that arrived by telephone or post, and both go through one action that refuses a business customer on the server rather than by hiding a card. The money follows the paperwork rather than being computed beside it. The invoice is cancelled by a Storno with its own gapless number — nothing is ever edited or deleted — a new invoice states the pro-rata value of the service actually delivered (FAGG §16, by days over the term paid for), and the refund is exactly the difference between the two documents. Where the consumer never expressly asked for the service to begin at once, they owe nothing and the whole amount goes back. `StripeClient::refund()` is new, keyed so a retry cannot send the money twice. The service ends through EndInstanceService and the `cancellation_scheduled` machinery that was already there. **The cancel button for modules.** BookAddon::cancelAtPeriodEnd() had no caller in the interface at all, so a customer could book a recurring charge in two clicks and had no way to stop it. It is on the module card now, with the date it runs until and a way back while the cancellation is still pending — and putting a module back settles nothing, because the term it was cancelled for was paid for in advance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 21:06:06 +02:00
nexxo	8f1630ba91	Bill a booked module every month, and put it on the invoice ... A module was never an item on the Stripe subscription, so it was charged in the month it was booked and never again. And the renewal document was written from our own contract snapshot, so it would not have said so even if the money had been taken. Two halves of one fault, closed together. Modules are items now. stripe:sync-catalogue mirrors a Product and a Price per module on both terms — a Stripe Price carries its own interval, and a booking frozen at an older figure needs its own Price, so they are keyed by module, amount, currency and interval in stripe_addon_prices. Booking adds an item with always_invoice: prorated by days AND charged there and then, which is the invoice the owner wants for a module booked mid-term. A second storage pack is a quantity on one item, not a second item. Cancelling takes the item off with no proration — no credit, and the next cycle is simply smaller — while the module itself is kept until the period end on subscription_addons.cancels_at and ended by clupilot:end-cancelled-addons. Documents are built from Stripe's own invoice lines. Stripe is what charged the customer; a document assembled from our figures would state a sum that is not the one taken. So every paid Stripe invoice gets one document with one number, idempotent on stripe_invoice_id — a cycle carrying package and every module together, a mid-period booking carrying just its prorated line, an upgrade carrying its proration. Only the wording is ours: each line is named from the catalogue rather than printed as a Price id, and a line nobody can name stays on the document under Stripe's own description and is logged. The checkout's own invoice is still the one exception; that purchase already has a document. Stripe being away never undoes a booking that has already reached the machine. The failure is parked on the contract in stripe_addon_sync and swept by the same clupilot:sync-stripe-subscriptions that retries a plan change, which finds its work from the bookings themselves rather than from the marker. A granted contract has no Stripe subscription and is not touched at all. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 20:22:02 +02:00
nexxo	35b312d5ef	Invoice every renewal, and tell Stripe when the package changes ... Two things Stripe was doing on its own, without us. **A renewal produced no invoice and no mail.** InvoiceMail went out from exactly one place — the first purchase — so a customer paying every month for a year received one invoice, for month one. Stripe already says when the money lands: invoice.paid with billing_reason subscription_cycle. What was missing was the document. A renewal has no Order behind it, and one was not invented for the occasion: an Order is something a customer bought, and writing a purchase nobody made would corrupt the record of what they have actually ordered. IssueInvoice::forBilledPeriod() issues from the CONTRACT instead, at its frozen net price, for the term Stripe billed. Idempotent against the Stripe invoice id, which is unique in the database rather than checked in PHP — and because the number is drawn inside the same transaction as the row, a redelivery takes its number back with it and the series keeps its sequence. Nothing in the paperwork can fail the webhook: issuing and mailing are both caught and logged, exactly as confirmByMail() does. Only a cycle renewal gets a document. The checkout's own invoice already has one; an upgrade's proration was worked out against Stripe's boundaries and would not match a document written from our snapshot; a charge raised by hand is for something this catalogue cannot describe. All three stay in the register, and are logged once as money no document of ours covers. **After a plan change, Stripe went on billing the old price.** There was no way to move a subscription onto another price at all, so a customer who upgraded paid for the smaller package every month afterwards. The client can now swap one, the item id it needs is learnt from Stripe's own events (and asked for once, for contracts older than the column), and the behaviour is chosen per direction: an upgrade settles immediately, so the cycle invoice stays exactly the contract price the renewal document states; a downgrade lands at the period boundary and settles nothing. A granted contract has no Stripe subscription and is left untouched. A change that reaches the machine and not Stripe is never rolled back — it is parked on the contract with the error and the behaviour it needed, logged as an error, and retried hourly by clupilot:sync-stripe-subscriptions. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 19:35:15 +02:00
nexxo	8f2252e81b	Book a downgrade for a date that cannot move, and sell a module once ... Two ways of charging a customer for something they did not get. A downgrade was due when `subscriptions.current_period_end` said so, and Stripe pushes that column forward on every renewal. So a downgrade booked in March was deferred to the end of April by April's renewal, and to the end of May by May's — each time by a whole term, and each time the customer was billed again for the package they had asked to leave. The due date was being re-derived from a moving target on every scheduler tick. It is decided once now, at the moment the customer decides, and stamped onto the contract: `pending_plan` and `pending_effective_at`, the two columns that have been in the schema since the first migration and were written by nothing at all. The shop stamps them, PlanChange reads them instead of the period end when a move is already booked, and clupilot:apply-due-plan-changes finds contracts by the stamped date rather than orders by a date it recomputes. The order stays what it always was — the customer's own record of the request, what the cart shows them and what they remove to change their mind — so it is still consumed with the change, and removing it unbooks the change. What it no longer does is decide when. A second downgrade replaces the first rather than queueing behind it; an upgrade clears one, or it would come due months later and undo the bigger package; a contract cancelled before the date takes the booking with it; and a customer with no contract can no longer place a downgrade at all, which was accepted before and could never be carried out. A booked change is now visible where the contract is read: on the plan card in the portal, because the cart entry disappears when it is paid for and the booking does not, and on the customer row in the console, because that is where an operator answers "what is this customer on". The second defect is the same money in one step: BookAddon guarded duplicates per ORDER — the unique index on (order_id, addon_key) — so two orders for the same module on one contract both went through. A stale tab or a double click bought priority support twice. But storage is deliberately sold in packs, and AddonCatalogue sums the quantities for exactly that reason, so "refuse the second" is only right for some of them. Which is which is declared beside each price in config/provisioning.php (`sold_as`), because it is a commercial decision about each module and not something to infer from a key: storage is a quantity; off-site backups are on or off, support is prioritised or it is not, Collabora Pro is one licence, and a machine answers to one own domain. An undeclared module counts as an entitlement — the cheaper of the two mistakes — and a test refuses to let one ship undeclared. Enforced in the action, where the portal, the console's grant screen and a webhook all pass, with the sentence the customer is shown rather than a developer's. A retried webhook for the SAME order still gets its one booking back; that is one purchase arriving twice, not two purchases. The portal stops offering what would be refused — booked, or already waiting in the cart — and goes on offering the pack. What is missing is on the Stripe side and is not invented here: nothing moves the subscription's item onto the new Price, so the renewal after a plan change still bills the old plan at Stripe. StripeClient only creates and archives catalogue objects, and swapping a price also needs the subscription ITEM id, which nothing stores. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 17:51:37 +02:00
nexxo	34874adec3	Apply a bought plan change instead of only pricing it ... PlanChange could say what a move would cost and whether it was allowed, and that was all it could do. Billing::purchase() wrote an upgrade order and nothing ever consumed it: same snapshot, same machine, same quota. A customer could pay for a bigger package and receive nothing. ApplyPlanChange is now the single place a change lands — it moves the contract onto the target's current version, writes one register row, settles the custom domain, and starts a run that resizes the machine. Applying the same order twice is a no-op, enforced by a unique event key rather than by a check two callers could both pass. Two things a plan change must not do, and now does not. A disk is never shrunk — Proxmox cannot, so the QUOTA shrinks instead, which is what was sold anyway. And a live machine is never rebooted as a side effect: cores and RAM are written, and where they need a restart the instance says so where an operator and the customer can both see it. The storage allowance also joins the build pipeline. ApplyStorageQuota was written for plan changes and ran only there, so a brand-new customer still got no quota at all — quota_gb reached the instance row and stopped, and every package delivered the whole disk. The test guarding that pipeline only counted its steps, which is how a list missing the one step that makes a package's storage real stayed green for its whole life. It now names the step. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 17:18:55 +02:00
nexxo	602602864a	Let a subscription or add-on be opened for free, with who and why on the row ... A grant is an order without money, not a second code path: GrantSubscription and GrantAddon create the same Order/Subscription/SubscriptionAddon rows a paid purchase does, with stripe_subscription_id left null and price_cents set to whatever the customer actually pays. OpenSubscription and BookAddon gained an optional overrides parameter so the price and provenance (who granted it, when, a note, an optional end date, and the catalogue price for legibility) land on the same snapshot every real purchase goes through, not a duplicate. New customers.grant_plan capability, Owner-only like secrets.manage — giving away service is exactly the kind of blast radius that precedent reserves for the Owner.	2026-07-29 12:41:06 +02:00
nexxo	0560ae743d	feat(billing): Stripe owns the billing cycle, we own capability ... A Product per plan family and a Price per priced row of a published version, plus the four subscribed webhook events that were arriving and being ignored. `stripe:sync-catalogue` mirrors the catalogue. Idempotent twice over: a stored id is skipped, and each call carries an idempotency key derived from our own row, so a crash between Stripe creating a Price and us recording its id gives back the same object rather than a second one. That matters more here than usual — a Stripe Price cannot be edited or deleted, so a duplicate is permanent. Drafts are not synced at all: a version that has promised nothing has no business in a price list. --dry-run shows what would be created. The webhook now handles invoice.paid, invoice.payment_failed, customer.subscription.updated and customer.subscription.deleted. It never re-derives an amount: the invoice is the authority for what was charged, and recomputing it from our catalogue would produce a second, disagreeing answer. A failed payment is recorded and nothing else — Stripe runs the dunning schedule, and cutting a customer off on the first failure would punish an expired card as though it were a refusal to pay. Only a cycle renewal moves the term on. Stripe also sends paid invoices for prorations and manual charges, and the checkout's own invoice — which is already in the register as the purchase, and would otherwise double every customer's first payment. Stripe does not guarantee delivery order, which is the source of most of the care here: - state changes are judged and written in one transaction with the row held, so two deliveries cannot both pass a check made on a stale copy; - an older event never overwrites a newer one, with a rank breaking ties between events sharing a second — their timestamps have one-second resolution, and a failed attempt and its successful retry routinely do; - a term is never shortened, and an ended contract is never revived; - an event for a contract that does not exist yet is HELD and replayed the moment it appears, rather than acknowledged and forgotten. A cancellation dropped that way would leave us serving someone who had already left. Held rows that never match are pruned after a week. Register entries are keyed by what they are about — the invoice, the attempt, the subscription — with a unique index doing the work, because a check two concurrent deliveries can both pass is not idempotency. PlanChange is now documented as the preview shown before someone confirms, not the invoice: Stripe's proration accounts for tax, existing credit and the exact second the change lands, and ours cannot. Not run against the live account — `stripe:sync-catalogue` creates objects that cannot be deleted, so that is the owner's call. The dry run lists 12. 457 tests green. Codex review clean after seven rounds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-26 13:36:28 +02:00
nexxo	7582df3de6	feat(billing): a proof register, and modules frozen at their booked price ... Two things the contract could not answer on its own: what happened, and what the customer's whole bill is. `subscription_records` is append-only, one row per commercial event. Flat columns for everything searched or relied on as evidence — event, customer, subscription, plan family and version, term, net/tax/gross, currency, tax rate, reverse charge, Stripe ids — PLUS a versioned JSON copy of the whole snapshot. Not JSON alone: you cannot query it, and "the amount is in there somewhere" is poor evidence. Copied, not joined, so a row still answers after the customer, the plan or the version have gone. The flat columns describe the TRANSACTION. Gross is what was actually taken; net and tax are that gross split by the rate that applied on the day. A discount lowers the taxable amount rather than creating negative VAT, and a free checkout is recorded as free instead of as paid in full. What was agreed sits beside it in the snapshot, so a charge that differs from the catalogue is preserved as a question rather than reconciled away. The register refuses to be rewritten, in bulk as well as one row at a time — model events do not fire for `query()->update()`, which is exactly the shape a careless data fix takes. `subscription_addons` carries the owner's rule: a customer's total is their subscription plus their modules, and all of it is frozen at what was agreed. Price protection covering only the plan would let a module quietly double for someone who booked it two years ago. A module they have NOT booked is a sale still to be made, at today's price — so the catalogue is consulted only for what is not in this table. Several bookings of one module are summed rather than reduced to one arbitrary row, or the page and the bill would disagree. Concurrency: one order books one module, enforced by a unique index rather than a lookup two retries can both pass; cancellation is an atomic claim; and each booking commits with its own register entry, so a failure cannot leave a sale without evidence and a retry that finds the booking cannot skip the event. Verified in the browser: with the module raised from 29,00 € to 59,00 € in the catalogue, the customer who booked it still sees 29,00 € and a total of 208,00 €, while a new customer is quoted 59,00 €. 436 tests green. Codex review clean after seven rounds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-26 13:07:34 +02:00
nexxo	6387c747d0	feat(billing): the plan catalogue becomes three tables, and config stops selling ... Plans lived in config/provisioning.php, where the owner cannot reach them and where a plan has no history. They now live in plan_families / plan_versions / plan_prices — a name that never moves, what the plan WAS at a point in time, and a price per version and term with its own Stripe Price id. - Availability is computed on every read (available_from <= now < until, half-open, UTC) plus a per-family sales kill switch. Nothing schedules a plan into or out of sale: a job that fails to run is a plan that silently misbehaves. - Overlaps crash rather than resolve. currentVersion() uses sole(), and scheduling takes a lock on the family and rejects an overlapping window — two versions on sale at once would decide a customer's price by row order. - A version is frozen from publication, not from first sale, and so is its price: a checkout is not instant, and an amount edited between the session opening and the webhook landing would contract someone at a price they were never quoted. Repricing publishes a new version, as Stripe requires anyway. - Neither a published version, its price, nor a family with customers can be deleted, and a family key cannot be renamed. All of those would null the provenance off existing contracts. - Subscriptions and orders record plan_version_id. A historical reference resolved by plan NAME hands back today's terms, which is the split-brain one level up. A checkout that carried its version is honoured even after the window closes — they paid for what they were shown. Switched atomically and failing closed: config('provisioning.plans') and plan_features are gone, and nothing falls back to them. A fallback would resurrect a plan the owner had just switched off. The seed lives in the migration, and PlanCatalogueTest pins what the config catalogue sold as the shadow comparison. `php artisan plans:check` reports overlaps, gaps and missing prices before a customer finds them. Contract-backed displays, which were reading the live catalogue: seat limits, the cloud card, the plan card, and admin MRR — the last three now divide a yearly contract down via Subscription::monthlyPriceCents(), since all three label the figure per month. Two recovery gaps closed along the way: the order now commits before the contract is opened (so a contract failure can never erase the record of a payment), a Stripe retry repairs a missing contract and restarts a run stranded with no_subscription, and TickProvisioning sweeps runs left pending by a crash rather than only running/waiting ones. 402 tests green. Codex review clean after thirteen rounds. Verified in the browser: portal, billing and console render unchanged off the new catalogue. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-26 12:05:56 +02:00
nexxo	52b41bb0d5	fix(billing): a paid order opens a contract, and provisioning obeys it ... The pipeline re-resolved config('provisioning.plans') by order.plan, so the subscription snapshot protected a customer's price but not their machine: shrinking a plan resized an existing customer's VM on its next run. Nothing created a subscription either, so closing this meant opening the contract at purchase and pointing provisioning at it. - OpenSubscription freezes the catalogue onto a subscription when a checkout is paid; StartCustomerProvisioning calls it inside the order transaction. - CustomerStep::plan() reads the frozen snapshot. ValidateOrder and ReserveResources fail closed with no_subscription rather than falling back to the catalogue, which is the bug itself. - template_vmid joins the snapshot so a re-clone cannot pick up a blueprint published after the sale. Deliberately outside FROZEN: it is how we build the machine, not a term the customer is owed, and a dead template must be replaceable without cancelling a contract. - TrafficMeter reads the allowance off the contract too — cutting a plan's traffic was otherwise enough to start throttling someone who bought more. - The migration backfills contracts for orders that already bought something, reconstructed from what was actually delivered where an instance exists, and adopts an existing order-less contract instead of opening a second. Orders paid in a currency the catalogue cannot price get none, matching the checkout path. price_cents stays the catalogue's NET price, which is what PlanChange prorates against — not Order::amount_cents, which holds Stripe's GROSS total. Reconciling the two belongs to the proof register and Stripe (phases 4/5). Also pins STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET blank in phpunit.xml: the operator's real secret was reaching the suite from .env and rejecting every unsigned test payload, which is why 7 webhook tests failed before any of this. Verified in the browser: with team traffic cut from 3000 to 500 GB in the catalogue, the customer's portal still shows 3 TB. 373 tests green. Codex review clean after three rounds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-26 11:10:00 +02:00
nexxo	6119044669	fix(billing): no plan changes after cancellation, no unknown terms ... A cancelled subscription still reported an upgrade as allowed and priced it, so a caller trusting that would have provisioned and billed a customer who had already left. And any term string other than the two we support was silently priced monthly while keeping the unknown value — a subscription whose price and billing period disagree. Both are refused now. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-26 09:57:53 +02:00
nexxo	460fac01b1	fix(billing): upgrade or downgrade is decided by rank, not by price ... With grandfathered prices the comparison inverts: a business plan bought when it cost less than today's team plan would have treated a move to team as an upgrade — charged immediately, while the customer loses resources. The plan's rank is frozen with the rest of the snapshot and decides the direction; prices only decide the amount. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-26 09:52:28 +02:00
nexxo	ac250071cb	feat(billing): immutable subscription snapshots and pro-rata plan changes ... The plan catalogue describes what we sell today; a customer who signed up last year bought last year's terms. Every commercially relevant condition — price, quotas, seats, the hardware behind the plan — is now frozen onto a subscription at signup, and the model refuses to let any of it be rewritten afterwards. A price rise applies to new subscriptions and cannot reach back into an existing contract. PlanChange holds the two rules, computed against the frozen price rather than today's catalogue: - Upgrading is immediate and pro rata: the new plan for the days left in the paid term, minus what the old plan was worth over those same days. On the last day of a month that is one day's difference, not a month's. - Downgrading waits for the end of the term. A yearly customer bought a year and can move down when it is up; a month is a month. A mid-term downgrade is a goodwill decision, not a self-service button, and its credit covers only the unused part of the difference. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-26 09:49:48 +02:00