Commit Graph

5 Commits (2277dfe4cb7edcbeec2fc74ade23e1dbae544e34)

Author SHA1 Message Date
nexxo 6d7c2bdf35 Ask whether they are a consumer, and let one change their mind
tests / pest (push) Failing after 8m35s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 22s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
Three things the product owed its customers and did not have.

**Who is on the other side.** There was no consumer/business flag anywhere,
and `vat_id` was standing in for one — which it cannot: a business without a
VAT number is an ordinary small business, and a consumer with one does not
exist. It is asked at sign-up now, correctable in the portal, and NULL where
nobody has been asked. Unknown is read as CONSUMER everywhere it decides a
right, because that mistake costs us a refund while the other one takes a
statutory right away from somebody who has it.

Reverse charge asks the recorded type instead of the number: an explicit
consumer is charged the domestic rate whatever `vat_id` says — previously they
were not, and anyone could zero their own VAT by getting a number verified. An
unrecorded type still falls back to the verified number, so no contract that is
already running changes rate.

**The fourteen-day right of withdrawal** (FAGG, §312g BGB), for consumers only,
at every door: the window is stamped on the contract when it is concluded, the
customer exercises it from the portal, an operator records one that arrived by
telephone or post, and both go through one action that refuses a business
customer on the server rather than by hiding a card.

The money follows the paperwork rather than being computed beside it. The
invoice is cancelled by a Storno with its own gapless number — nothing is ever
edited or deleted — a new invoice states the pro-rata value of the service
actually delivered (FAGG §16, by days over the term paid for), and the refund
is exactly the difference between the two documents. Where the consumer never
expressly asked for the service to begin at once, they owe nothing and the whole
amount goes back. `StripeClient::refund()` is new, keyed so a retry cannot send
the money twice. The service ends through EndInstanceService and the
`cancellation_scheduled` machinery that was already there.

**The cancel button for modules.** BookAddon::cancelAtPeriodEnd() had no caller
in the interface at all, so a customer could book a recurring charge in two
clicks and had no way to stop it. It is on the module card now, with the date it
runs until and a way back while the cancellation is still pending — and putting
a module back settles nothing, because the term it was cancelled for was paid
for in advance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 21:06:06 +02:00
nexxo 8f1630ba91 Bill a booked module every month, and put it on the invoice
A module was never an item on the Stripe subscription, so it was charged in
the month it was booked and never again. And the renewal document was written
from our own contract snapshot, so it would not have said so even if the money
had been taken. Two halves of one fault, closed together.

Modules are items now. stripe:sync-catalogue mirrors a Product and a Price per
module on both terms — a Stripe Price carries its own interval, and a booking
frozen at an older figure needs its own Price, so they are keyed by module,
amount, currency and interval in stripe_addon_prices. Booking adds an item with
always_invoice: prorated by days AND charged there and then, which is the
invoice the owner wants for a module booked mid-term. A second storage pack is
a quantity on one item, not a second item. Cancelling takes the item off with
no proration — no credit, and the next cycle is simply smaller — while the
module itself is kept until the period end on subscription_addons.cancels_at
and ended by clupilot:end-cancelled-addons.

Documents are built from Stripe's own invoice lines. Stripe is what charged the
customer; a document assembled from our figures would state a sum that is not
the one taken. So every paid Stripe invoice gets one document with one number,
idempotent on stripe_invoice_id — a cycle carrying package and every module
together, a mid-period booking carrying just its prorated line, an upgrade
carrying its proration. Only the wording is ours: each line is named from the
catalogue rather than printed as a Price id, and a line nobody can name stays on
the document under Stripe's own description and is logged. The checkout's own
invoice is still the one exception; that purchase already has a document.

Stripe being away never undoes a booking that has already reached the machine.
The failure is parked on the contract in stripe_addon_sync and swept by the
same clupilot:sync-stripe-subscriptions that retries a plan change, which finds
its work from the bookings themselves rather than from the marker. A granted
contract has no Stripe subscription and is not touched at all.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 20:22:02 +02:00
nexxo 35b312d5ef Invoice every renewal, and tell Stripe when the package changes
Two things Stripe was doing on its own, without us.

**A renewal produced no invoice and no mail.** InvoiceMail went out from
exactly one place — the first purchase — so a customer paying every month
for a year received one invoice, for month one. Stripe already says when
the money lands: invoice.paid with billing_reason subscription_cycle. What
was missing was the document.

A renewal has no Order behind it, and one was not invented for the
occasion: an Order is something a customer bought, and writing a purchase
nobody made would corrupt the record of what they have actually ordered.
IssueInvoice::forBilledPeriod() issues from the CONTRACT instead, at its
frozen net price, for the term Stripe billed. Idempotent against the Stripe
invoice id, which is unique in the database rather than checked in PHP —
and because the number is drawn inside the same transaction as the row, a
redelivery takes its number back with it and the series keeps its sequence.
Nothing in the paperwork can fail the webhook: issuing and mailing are both
caught and logged, exactly as confirmByMail() does.

Only a cycle renewal gets a document. The checkout's own invoice already
has one; an upgrade's proration was worked out against Stripe's boundaries
and would not match a document written from our snapshot; a charge raised
by hand is for something this catalogue cannot describe. All three stay in
the register, and are logged once as money no document of ours covers.

**After a plan change, Stripe went on billing the old price.** There was no
way to move a subscription onto another price at all, so a customer who
upgraded paid for the smaller package every month afterwards. The client
can now swap one, the item id it needs is learnt from Stripe's own events
(and asked for once, for contracts older than the column), and the
behaviour is chosen per direction: an upgrade settles immediately, so the
cycle invoice stays exactly the contract price the renewal document states;
a downgrade lands at the period boundary and settles nothing.

A granted contract has no Stripe subscription and is left untouched. A
change that reaches the machine and not Stripe is never rolled back — it is
parked on the contract with the error and the behaviour it needed, logged
as an error, and retried hourly by clupilot:sync-stripe-subscriptions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 19:35:15 +02:00
Claude a58faf3f85 Manage the Stripe key from the console, behind a password and a test
tests / pest (push) Successful in 8m56s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 20s Details
tests / release (push) Successful in 4s Details
Changing a key meant a shell, a file edit and a cache rebuild — and the person
who owns the Stripe account is not necessarily the person who owns the server.

Two gates, not one. The capability decides who may open the page; every operator
has console.view, and that must not mean "can read the payment key". The
password decides whether this SESSION may see or change anything, because the
realistic threat is not a stranger but an unlocked machine, and a session is
exactly what that hands over. Both are re-checked server-side on every action —
a Livewire action is reachable by anyone who can post to /livewire/update.

The value is stored encrypted under a key of its own, SECRETS_KEY, and the vault
refuses to work without it rather than falling back to APP_KEY: rotating APP_KEY
is ordinary maintenance and would otherwise destroy every stored credential,
discovered when Stripe stops answering. It is read where it is used, not
overlaid onto config at boot — an overlay adds a query to every request
including the public site, and leaves queue workers holding whatever was true
when they started. It is never shown again, only outlined, and never enters a
Livewire property that would carry it to the browser and back in the snapshot.

A registry, not an env editor: a form that can set any environment variable is a
privilege-escalation primitive, and one bad value bricks the installation with
no way back through that same form.

The test button is the part that matters. It reports which Stripe account the
key belongs to, whether it is LIVE or test — the most expensive mistake here is
pasting one where the other belongs, and both look identical in a form — and
which webhook endpoints exist with the events each subscribes to. A key can be
perfectly valid while the endpoint listens for the wrong five events, and
nothing fails until a payment goes unrecorded.

The webhook signing secret deliberately stays in .env. It is read on every
incoming payment event; in the database, a database problem becomes silently
failing signature checks.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-27 09:01:16 +02:00
nexxo 0560ae743d feat(billing): Stripe owns the billing cycle, we own capability
A Product per plan family and a Price per priced row of a published version,
plus the four subscribed webhook events that were arriving and being ignored.

`stripe:sync-catalogue` mirrors the catalogue. Idempotent twice over: a stored
id is skipped, and each call carries an idempotency key derived from our own
row, so a crash between Stripe creating a Price and us recording its id gives
back the same object rather than a second one. That matters more here than
usual — a Stripe Price cannot be edited or deleted, so a duplicate is
permanent. Drafts are not synced at all: a version that has promised nothing
has no business in a price list. --dry-run shows what would be created.

The webhook now handles invoice.paid, invoice.payment_failed,
customer.subscription.updated and customer.subscription.deleted. It never
re-derives an amount: the invoice is the authority for what was charged, and
recomputing it from our catalogue would produce a second, disagreeing answer.
A failed payment is recorded and nothing else — Stripe runs the dunning
schedule, and cutting a customer off on the first failure would punish an
expired card as though it were a refusal to pay.

Only a cycle renewal moves the term on. Stripe also sends paid invoices for
prorations and manual charges, and the checkout's own invoice — which is
already in the register as the purchase, and would otherwise double every
customer's first payment.

Stripe does not guarantee delivery order, which is the source of most of the
care here:
- state changes are judged and written in one transaction with the row held,
  so two deliveries cannot both pass a check made on a stale copy;
- an older event never overwrites a newer one, with a rank breaking ties
  between events sharing a second — their timestamps have one-second
  resolution, and a failed attempt and its successful retry routinely do;
- a term is never shortened, and an ended contract is never revived;
- an event for a contract that does not exist yet is HELD and replayed the
  moment it appears, rather than acknowledged and forgotten. A cancellation
  dropped that way would leave us serving someone who had already left. Held
  rows that never match are pruned after a week.

Register entries are keyed by what they are about — the invoice, the attempt,
the subscription — with a unique index doing the work, because a check two
concurrent deliveries can both pass is not idempotency.

PlanChange is now documented as the preview shown before someone confirms, not
the invoice: Stripe's proration accounts for tax, existing credit and the exact
second the change lands, and ours cannot.

Not run against the live account — `stripe:sync-catalogue` creates objects that
cannot be deleted, so that is the owner's call. The dry run lists 12.

457 tests green. Codex review clean after seven rounds.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 13:36:28 +02:00