A verifier that returns the number in display form ("DE 811 907 980") would
have failed the comparison against the normalised current value and silently
switched a genuine reverse-charge customer back to domestic VAT. Both sides are
normalised now, and vat_id_verified_at is a real datetime rather than a string.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A timestamp alone said "some number was checked once": editing the field left
it intact, so a customer could swap a verified foreign VAT ID for any
plausible-looking one and keep zero-VAT pricing. The verified value is stored
and compared, which makes the rule self-enforcing — no writer has to remember
to clear a flag, and there are several writers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Any non-empty string starting with two characters other than AT switched the
customer to reverse charge — typing "XX123" was a 20 % discount. Reverse charge
now requires a VAT ID that is verified, belongs to an EU member state other than
ours, and looks like a VAT number at all. Unverified is the normal state and
means the domestic rate: over-collecting is correctable, under-collecting is a
tax liability.
Changing the number clears its verification. Verification itself (VIES) is not
built yet, so reverse charge stays off until someone confirms a number — which
is the safe direction to be wrong in.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Codex was right that this could misstate real charges: an EU business with a
VAT ID registered in another country is billed under reverse charge, and we
were adding 20 % Austrian VAT to their total anyway. TaxTreatment resolves it
from the customer's VAT ID, and the whole page — cart, plan cards, add-on
cards — now states one treatment instead of contradicting itself.
Explicitly NOT handled: cross-border sales to private individuals, which are
taxed at the buyer's national rate under OSS. That needs a maintained rate
table and a tax adviser, not a guess, so those fall back to the domestic rate —
over-collecting rather than under-collecting.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The note rounded VAT after aggregating while the total rounded per order, so
cent-level prices made the two disagree — and a customer who spots that stops
trusting every other number on the page.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two contradicting plan upgrades sat in the cart at 799 and 399 € — no checkout
could resolve which one the customer meant. Choosing another now replaces the
pending one and says so; add-ons still stack, because buying 200 GB as two packs
is a sensible thing to want.
Every price now states net or gross and how often. The cart shows net per line
with "pro Monat" or "einmalig", then subtotal, VAT and gross — and separates
the monthly recurring amount from a one-off traffic top-up sharing the same
cart, because those are two different commitments. The rate is configurable
(CLUPILOT_TAX_PERCENT, 20 % default) since it follows the seller's country.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
"5 purchases pending" told nobody what they had ordered and offered no way to
change their mind. The billing page now lists each pending purchase by name,
what it costs, when it was added, and the total — with a remove button per row
behind a confirmation, like every other destructive action in the console.
The wording lives on the Order model rather than in the view, so the cart, the
invoice list and any later confirmation mail cannot each invent their own name
for the same row. Removal is scoped to the customer's own still-pending orders,
checked in the modal itself: modals are reachable without the page's guards.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
nexxo