Commit Graph

2 Commits (460fac01b1ec57de3fdfe033ccad4a8e39f1722e)

Author SHA1 Message Date
nexxo 460fac01b1 fix(billing): upgrade or downgrade is decided by rank, not by price
tests / pest (push) Successful in 6m51s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 20s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
With grandfathered prices the comparison inverts: a business plan bought when
it cost less than today's team plan would have treated a move to team as an
upgrade — charged immediately, while the customer loses resources. The plan's
rank is frozen with the rest of the snapshot and decides the direction; prices
only decide the amount.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 09:52:28 +02:00
nexxo ac250071cb feat(billing): immutable subscription snapshots and pro-rata plan changes
The plan catalogue describes what we sell today; a customer who signed up last
year bought last year's terms. Every commercially relevant condition — price,
quotas, seats, the hardware behind the plan — is now frozen onto a subscription
at signup, and the model refuses to let any of it be rewritten afterwards. A
price rise applies to new subscriptions and cannot reach back into an existing
contract.

PlanChange holds the two rules, computed against the frozen price rather than
today's catalogue:

- Upgrading is immediate and pro rata: the new plan for the days left in the
  paid term, minus what the old plan was worth over those same days. On the
  last day of a month that is one day's difference, not a month's.
- Downgrading waits for the end of the term. A yearly customer bought a year
  and can move down when it is up; a month is a month. A mid-term downgrade is
  a goodwill decision, not a self-service button, and its credit covers only
  the unused part of the difference.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 09:49:48 +02:00