Commit Graph

5 Commits (460fac01b1ec57de3fdfe033ccad4a8e39f1722e)

Author SHA1 Message Date
nexxo 460fac01b1 fix(billing): upgrade or downgrade is decided by rank, not by price
tests / pest (push) Successful in 6m51s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 20s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
With grandfathered prices the comparison inverts: a business plan bought when
it cost less than today's team plan would have treated a move to team as an
upgrade — charged immediately, while the customer loses resources. The plan's
rank is frozen with the rest of the snapshot and decides the direction; prices
only decide the amount.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 09:52:28 +02:00
nexxo ac250071cb feat(billing): immutable subscription snapshots and pro-rata plan changes
The plan catalogue describes what we sell today; a customer who signed up last
year bought last year's terms. Every commercially relevant condition — price,
quotas, seats, the hardware behind the plan — is now frozen onto a subscription
at signup, and the model refuses to let any of it be rewritten afterwards. A
price rise applies to new subscriptions and cannot reach back into an existing
contract.

PlanChange holds the two rules, computed against the frozen price rather than
today's catalogue:

- Upgrading is immediate and pro rata: the new plan for the days left in the
  paid term, minus what the old plan was worth over those same days. On the
  last day of a month that is one day's difference, not a month's.
- Downgrading waits for the end of the term. A yearly customer bought a year
  and can move down when it is up; a month is a month. A mid-term downgrade is
  a goodwill decision, not a self-service button, and its credit covers only
  the unused part of the difference.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 09:49:48 +02:00
nexxo 5aef5e693c fix(billing): verification vouches for a value, not for a row
tests / pest (push) Successful in 6m52s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 20s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
A timestamp alone said "some number was checked once": editing the field left
it intact, so a customer could swap a verified foreign VAT ID for any
plausible-looking one and keep zero-VAT pricing. The verified value is stored
and compared, which makes the rule self-enforcing — no writer has to remember
to clear a flag, and there are several writers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 09:34:40 +02:00
nexxo 42ceafb57f fix(billing): a self-declared VAT ID must not zero the tax
tests / pest (push) Successful in 7m13s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 22s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
Any non-empty string starting with two characters other than AT switched the
customer to reverse charge — typing "XX123" was a 20 % discount. Reverse charge
now requires a VAT ID that is verified, belongs to an EU member state other than
ours, and looks like a VAT number at all. Unverified is the normal state and
means the domestic rate: over-collecting is correctable, under-collecting is a
tax liability.

Changing the number clears its verification. Verification itself (VIES) is not
built yet, so reverse charge stays off until someone confirms a number — which
is the safe direction to be wrong in.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 09:32:42 +02:00
nexxo 76510a59a3 fix(billing): VAT follows the customer, not a global setting
tests / pest (push) Successful in 7m28s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 21s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
Codex was right that this could misstate real charges: an EU business with a
VAT ID registered in another country is billed under reverse charge, and we
were adding 20 % Austrian VAT to their total anyway. TaxTreatment resolves it
from the customer's VAT ID, and the whole page — cart, plan cards, add-on
cards — now states one treatment instead of contradicting itself.

Explicitly NOT handled: cross-border sales to private individuals, which are
taxed at the buyer's national rate under OSS. That needs a maintained rate
table and a tax adviser, not a guess, so those fall back to the domestic rate —
over-collecting rather than under-collecting.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 09:30:17 +02:00