Commit Graph

2 Commits (49d528dbea3f024b2cfa9b2957a33e7930f8082e)

Author SHA1 Message Date
nexxo 32a8bd9a88 Refuse the sale instead of reaching Stripe without a key
Task 5: Billing::purchase() now checks SecretVault for a stripe.secret before
touching anything else — no customer, no plan lookup, no Order row — and the
customer reads a plain sentence instead of a 500 page. HttpStripeClient's own
secret() throws the same StripeNotConfigured exception rather than sending a
request with an empty bearer token and letting Stripe's 401 stand in for the
real cause.

isConfigured() was fixed alongside it: it used to call secret() too, which
would have turned every "is Stripe set up?" check (the checkout controller,
the catalogue sync commands) into an uncaught exception the moment a key went
missing — the opposite of what this task is for. It now reads the vault
directly.

The new guard is unconditional, including for the cart-only purchase types
(storage, addon, plan changes) that never call Stripe themselves — a cart
order nobody can ever pay for is pointless to create. That broke every
existing Billing/Cart/Downgrade test that calls purchase() without a stored
key; each affected fixture now deposits one via the new withStripeSecret()
Pest helper. A few of those tests (CustomDomainAccessTest, DowngradeTest) were
passing already but for the wrong reason — the new guard, not the check they
were named for — since both only assert an order was NOT created; they get
the same fixture fix so they still prove what they claim.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 11:58:01 +02:00
nexxo 85fcc154b8 Measure availability, and let a customer move down again
Availability is now counted from our own monitoring answers. Uptime Kuma knows
the figure, but the REST bridge in front of it only answers "healthy, yes or
no", and waiting for the bridge to grow an endpoint would have left the panel
without the number indefinitely. The sync already asks on a schedule; counting
the answers gives a percentage that is ours and explainable.

An unanswered check is not a failed one — the counter only moves when a real
answer arrived, so our monitoring going down does not become the customer's
outage on the one figure they are asked to trust. An instance nobody has ever
checked shows no availability rather than 100 %.

The downgrade path existed nowhere. Going down is not the mirror of going up:
it can ask an instance to hold more than the target plan allows. Smaller plans
are now listed even when they cannot be taken, with the obstacle in the
customer's own numbers — "you have 31 users, this package allows 10" — because
a greyed-out button that does not name what is in the way is the thing people
ring about. Storage is checked against the last real reading rather than the
contractual allowance, or anyone who once bought a large plan could never leave
it. The limit is re-checked in the action: a rule enforced only in markup is
not enforced.

And the smaller corrections from this round:

- The cloud tab carried a hardcoded "B" as the instance's initial, and the PHP
  and MariaDB versions, which tell a tenant nothing they can act on.
- "EU — Serverstandort im Angebot festgehalten" under a label already reading
  "Serverstandort" was two sentences saying nothing. It is the country.
- Support promised a reply "binnen 4 Std." with nothing behind it. What is true
  everywhere else is an answer on the same working day.
- The actions column appeared even when no row in the table had an action.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-27 16:41:15 +02:00