7 Commits (623acb3702cbbd9f75e25c054e4fda4e227a99e7)
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
f02e86769b |
Charge the price the website shows, and hand a withdrawal back in full
tests / pest (push) Failing after 9m21s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 21s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Stripe was charging the catalogue's NET figure while the document added the domestic rate on top: a customer quoted 214,80 paid 179,00 and was then invoiced for VAT nobody had collected. Under para 11(12) UStG that VAT is owed to the tax office whether or not it ever arrived, so every document issued created a liability against revenue that did not contain it. The Stripe Price now carries the GROSS figure. price_cents stays net - it is frozen onto every contract and PlanChange prorates against it, so redefining it would corrupt every pro-rata sum ever computed. Only the amount at the till moved, and it is formed by the one call TaxTreatment already answers for the price sheet and for the invoice, so displayed, charged and invoiced cannot drift apart. Stripe's automatic_tax is deliberately not used. TaxTreatment is the single tax authority here, and a second rate computed by Stripe would take 19 % from a German consumer while our document said 20 %. A Stripe Price cannot be edited, so a changed figure means a new Price and the old one archived - which stops it being SOLD and leaves every subscription already on it billing the old amount for ever. stripe:reprice-subscriptions is the second half, and a command of its own because it touches live money. A withdrawing consumer is refunded in full, as the owner decided. That is more generous than FAGG para 16 requires, and it makes the express-request consent the statute hinges on irrelevant - so the gate is gone rather than left looking load-bearing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
6d7c2bdf35 |
Ask whether they are a consumer, and let one change their mind
tests / pest (push) Failing after 8m35s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 22s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Three things the product owed its customers and did not have. **Who is on the other side.** There was no consumer/business flag anywhere, and `vat_id` was standing in for one — which it cannot: a business without a VAT number is an ordinary small business, and a consumer with one does not exist. It is asked at sign-up now, correctable in the portal, and NULL where nobody has been asked. Unknown is read as CONSUMER everywhere it decides a right, because that mistake costs us a refund while the other one takes a statutory right away from somebody who has it. Reverse charge asks the recorded type instead of the number: an explicit consumer is charged the domestic rate whatever `vat_id` says — previously they were not, and anyone could zero their own VAT by getting a number verified. An unrecorded type still falls back to the verified number, so no contract that is already running changes rate. **The fourteen-day right of withdrawal** (FAGG, §312g BGB), for consumers only, at every door: the window is stamped on the contract when it is concluded, the customer exercises it from the portal, an operator records one that arrived by telephone or post, and both go through one action that refuses a business customer on the server rather than by hiding a card. The money follows the paperwork rather than being computed beside it. The invoice is cancelled by a Storno with its own gapless number — nothing is ever edited or deleted — a new invoice states the pro-rata value of the service actually delivered (FAGG §16, by days over the term paid for), and the refund is exactly the difference between the two documents. Where the consumer never expressly asked for the service to begin at once, they owe nothing and the whole amount goes back. `StripeClient::refund()` is new, keyed so a retry cannot send the money twice. The service ends through EndInstanceService and the `cancellation_scheduled` machinery that was already there. **The cancel button for modules.** BookAddon::cancelAtPeriodEnd() had no caller in the interface at all, so a customer could book a recurring charge in two clicks and had no way to stop it. It is on the module card now, with the date it runs until and a way back while the cancellation is still pending — and putting a module back settles nothing, because the term it was cancelled for was paid for in advance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
602602864a |
Let a subscription or add-on be opened for free, with who and why on the row
A grant is an order without money, not a second code path: GrantSubscription and GrantAddon create the same Order/Subscription/SubscriptionAddon rows a paid purchase does, with stripe_subscription_id left null and price_cents set to whatever the customer actually pays. OpenSubscription and BookAddon gained an optional overrides parameter so the price and provenance (who granted it, when, a note, an optional end date, and the catalogue price for legibility) land on the same snapshot every real purchase goes through, not a duplicate. New customers.grant_plan capability, Owner-only like secrets.manage — giving away service is exactly the kind of blast radius that precedent reserves for the Owner. |
|
|
|
0560ae743d |
feat(billing): Stripe owns the billing cycle, we own capability
A Product per plan family and a Price per priced row of a published version, plus the four subscribed webhook events that were arriving and being ignored. `stripe:sync-catalogue` mirrors the catalogue. Idempotent twice over: a stored id is skipped, and each call carries an idempotency key derived from our own row, so a crash between Stripe creating a Price and us recording its id gives back the same object rather than a second one. That matters more here than usual — a Stripe Price cannot be edited or deleted, so a duplicate is permanent. Drafts are not synced at all: a version that has promised nothing has no business in a price list. --dry-run shows what would be created. The webhook now handles invoice.paid, invoice.payment_failed, customer.subscription.updated and customer.subscription.deleted. It never re-derives an amount: the invoice is the authority for what was charged, and recomputing it from our catalogue would produce a second, disagreeing answer. A failed payment is recorded and nothing else — Stripe runs the dunning schedule, and cutting a customer off on the first failure would punish an expired card as though it were a refusal to pay. Only a cycle renewal moves the term on. Stripe also sends paid invoices for prorations and manual charges, and the checkout's own invoice — which is already in the register as the purchase, and would otherwise double every customer's first payment. Stripe does not guarantee delivery order, which is the source of most of the care here: - state changes are judged and written in one transaction with the row held, so two deliveries cannot both pass a check made on a stale copy; - an older event never overwrites a newer one, with a rank breaking ties between events sharing a second — their timestamps have one-second resolution, and a failed attempt and its successful retry routinely do; - a term is never shortened, and an ended contract is never revived; - an event for a contract that does not exist yet is HELD and replayed the moment it appears, rather than acknowledged and forgotten. A cancellation dropped that way would leave us serving someone who had already left. Held rows that never match are pruned after a week. Register entries are keyed by what they are about — the invoice, the attempt, the subscription — with a unique index doing the work, because a check two concurrent deliveries can both pass is not idempotency. PlanChange is now documented as the preview shown before someone confirms, not the invoice: Stripe's proration accounts for tax, existing credit and the exact second the change lands, and ours cannot. Not run against the live account — `stripe:sync-catalogue` creates objects that cannot be deleted, so that is the owner's call. The dry run lists 12. 457 tests green. Codex review clean after seven rounds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
7582df3de6 |
feat(billing): a proof register, and modules frozen at their booked price
Two things the contract could not answer on its own: what happened, and what the customer's whole bill is. `subscription_records` is append-only, one row per commercial event. Flat columns for everything searched or relied on as evidence — event, customer, subscription, plan family and version, term, net/tax/gross, currency, tax rate, reverse charge, Stripe ids — PLUS a versioned JSON copy of the whole snapshot. Not JSON alone: you cannot query it, and "the amount is in there somewhere" is poor evidence. Copied, not joined, so a row still answers after the customer, the plan or the version have gone. The flat columns describe the TRANSACTION. Gross is what was actually taken; net and tax are that gross split by the rate that applied on the day. A discount lowers the taxable amount rather than creating negative VAT, and a free checkout is recorded as free instead of as paid in full. What was agreed sits beside it in the snapshot, so a charge that differs from the catalogue is preserved as a question rather than reconciled away. The register refuses to be rewritten, in bulk as well as one row at a time — model events do not fire for `query()->update()`, which is exactly the shape a careless data fix takes. `subscription_addons` carries the owner's rule: a customer's total is their subscription plus their modules, and all of it is frozen at what was agreed. Price protection covering only the plan would let a module quietly double for someone who booked it two years ago. A module they have NOT booked is a sale still to be made, at today's price — so the catalogue is consulted only for what is not in this table. Several bookings of one module are summed rather than reduced to one arbitrary row, or the page and the bill would disagree. Concurrency: one order books one module, enforced by a unique index rather than a lookup two retries can both pass; cancellation is an atomic claim; and each booking commits with its own register entry, so a failure cannot leave a sale without evidence and a retry that finds the booking cannot skip the event. Verified in the browser: with the module raised from 29,00 € to 59,00 € in the catalogue, the customer who booked it still sees 29,00 € and a total of 208,00 €, while a new customer is quoted 59,00 €. 436 tests green. Codex review clean after seven rounds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
6387c747d0 |
feat(billing): the plan catalogue becomes three tables, and config stops selling
Plans lived in config/provisioning.php, where the owner cannot reach them and
where a plan has no history. They now live in plan_families / plan_versions /
plan_prices — a name that never moves, what the plan WAS at a point in time,
and a price per version and term with its own Stripe Price id.
- Availability is computed on every read (available_from <= now < until,
half-open, UTC) plus a per-family sales kill switch. Nothing schedules a plan
into or out of sale: a job that fails to run is a plan that silently
misbehaves.
- Overlaps crash rather than resolve. currentVersion() uses sole(), and
scheduling takes a lock on the family and rejects an overlapping window —
two versions on sale at once would decide a customer's price by row order.
- A version is frozen from publication, not from first sale, and so is its
price: a checkout is not instant, and an amount edited between the session
opening and the webhook landing would contract someone at a price they were
never quoted. Repricing publishes a new version, as Stripe requires anyway.
- Neither a published version, its price, nor a family with customers can be
deleted, and a family key cannot be renamed. All of those would null the
provenance off existing contracts.
- Subscriptions and orders record plan_version_id. A historical reference
resolved by plan NAME hands back today's terms, which is the split-brain one
level up. A checkout that carried its version is honoured even after the
window closes — they paid for what they were shown.
Switched atomically and failing closed: config('provisioning.plans') and
plan_features are gone, and nothing falls back to them. A fallback would
resurrect a plan the owner had just switched off. The seed lives in the
migration, and PlanCatalogueTest pins what the config catalogue sold as the
shadow comparison. `php artisan plans:check` reports overlaps, gaps and
missing prices before a customer finds them.
Contract-backed displays, which were reading the live catalogue:
seat limits, the cloud card, the plan card, and admin MRR — the last three now
divide a yearly contract down via Subscription::monthlyPriceCents(), since all
three label the figure per month.
Two recovery gaps closed along the way: the order now commits before the
contract is opened (so a contract failure can never erase the record of a
payment), a Stripe retry repairs a missing contract and restarts a run stranded
with no_subscription, and TickProvisioning sweeps runs left pending by a crash
rather than only running/waiting ones.
402 tests green. Codex review clean after thirteen rounds. Verified in the
browser: portal, billing and console render unchanged off the new catalogue.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
|
|
52b41bb0d5 |
fix(billing): a paid order opens a contract, and provisioning obeys it
The pipeline re-resolved config('provisioning.plans') by order.plan, so the
subscription snapshot protected a customer's price but not their machine:
shrinking a plan resized an existing customer's VM on its next run. Nothing
created a subscription either, so closing this meant opening the contract at
purchase and pointing provisioning at it.
- OpenSubscription freezes the catalogue onto a subscription when a checkout
is paid; StartCustomerProvisioning calls it inside the order transaction.
- CustomerStep::plan() reads the frozen snapshot. ValidateOrder and
ReserveResources fail closed with no_subscription rather than falling back
to the catalogue, which is the bug itself.
- template_vmid joins the snapshot so a re-clone cannot pick up a blueprint
published after the sale. Deliberately outside FROZEN: it is how we build
the machine, not a term the customer is owed, and a dead template must be
replaceable without cancelling a contract.
- TrafficMeter reads the allowance off the contract too — cutting a plan's
traffic was otherwise enough to start throttling someone who bought more.
- The migration backfills contracts for orders that already bought something,
reconstructed from what was actually delivered where an instance exists,
and adopts an existing order-less contract instead of opening a second.
Orders paid in a currency the catalogue cannot price get none, matching the
checkout path.
price_cents stays the catalogue's NET price, which is what PlanChange
prorates against — not Order::amount_cents, which holds Stripe's GROSS total.
Reconciling the two belongs to the proof register and Stripe (phases 4/5).
Also pins STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET blank in phpunit.xml: the operator's real
secret was reaching the suite from .env and rejecting every unsigned test
payload, which is why 7 webhook tests failed before any of this.
Verified in the browser: with team traffic cut from 3000 to 500 GB in the
catalogue, the customer's portal still shows 3 TB.
373 tests green. Codex review clean after three rounds.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|