Commit Graph

3 Commits (6b8412f0c394981c091fdba767fc2defe3627124)

Author SHA1 Message Date
nexxo 8f2252e81b Book a downgrade for a date that cannot move, and sell a module once
Two ways of charging a customer for something they did not get.

A downgrade was due when `subscriptions.current_period_end` said so, and
Stripe pushes that column forward on every renewal. So a downgrade booked in
March was deferred to the end of April by April's renewal, and to the end of
May by May's — each time by a whole term, and each time the customer was
billed again for the package they had asked to leave. The due date was being
re-derived from a moving target on every scheduler tick.

It is decided once now, at the moment the customer decides, and stamped onto
the contract: `pending_plan` and `pending_effective_at`, the two columns that
have been in the schema since the first migration and were written by nothing
at all. The shop stamps them, PlanChange reads them instead of the period end
when a move is already booked, and clupilot:apply-due-plan-changes finds
contracts by the stamped date rather than orders by a date it recomputes.

The order stays what it always was — the customer's own record of the request,
what the cart shows them and what they remove to change their mind — so it is
still consumed with the change, and removing it unbooks the change. What it no
longer does is decide when. A second downgrade replaces the first rather than
queueing behind it; an upgrade clears one, or it would come due months later
and undo the bigger package; a contract cancelled before the date takes the
booking with it; and a customer with no contract can no longer place a
downgrade at all, which was accepted before and could never be carried out.

A booked change is now visible where the contract is read: on the plan card in
the portal, because the cart entry disappears when it is paid for and the
booking does not, and on the customer row in the console, because that is
where an operator answers "what is this customer on".

The second defect is the same money in one step: BookAddon guarded duplicates
per ORDER — the unique index on (order_id, addon_key) — so two orders for the
same module on one contract both went through. A stale tab or a double click
bought priority support twice.

But storage is deliberately sold in packs, and AddonCatalogue sums the
quantities for exactly that reason, so "refuse the second" is only right for
some of them. Which is which is declared beside each price in
config/provisioning.php (`sold_as`), because it is a commercial decision about
each module and not something to infer from a key: storage is a quantity;
off-site backups are on or off, support is prioritised or it is not, Collabora
Pro is one licence, and a machine answers to one own domain. An undeclared
module counts as an entitlement — the cheaper of the two mistakes — and a test
refuses to let one ship undeclared.

Enforced in the action, where the portal, the console's grant screen and a
webhook all pass, with the sentence the customer is shown rather than a
developer's. A retried webhook for the SAME order still gets its one booking
back; that is one purchase arriving twice, not two purchases. The portal stops
offering what would be refused — booked, or already waiting in the cart — and
goes on offering the pack.

What is missing is on the Stripe side and is not invented here: nothing moves
the subscription's item onto the new Price, so the renewal after a plan change
still bills the old plan at Stripe. StripeClient only creates and archives
catalogue objects, and swapping a price also needs the subscription ITEM id,
which nothing stores.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 17:51:37 +02:00
nexxo c71b2c362b Skip the invoice for a full gift, keep it out of revenue, hide its price
IssueInvoice now rejects free-grant orders before it will consume an invoice
number for them — a full gift produces no invoice at all, while a discounted
grant still charges something and is invoiced exactly like an ordinary sale.
Keyed on the linked subscription/add-on's own provenance, not on the amount
being zero, so a genuinely fully-discounted Stripe checkout is unaffected.

Revenue excludes granted contracts from MRR/ARR/ARPU and the contracts count
— a gift at 0 must not drag the average down — and shows their number as its
own KPI instead of folding it in, since the owner measures himself on it.

The portal (Cloud, Billing) shows a granted package or module without a
price at all: not "free", not struck through, just the service, so a later
conversion to paid does not read as a negotiation.
2026-07-29 12:41:32 +02:00
nexxo 7582df3de6 feat(billing): a proof register, and modules frozen at their booked price
Two things the contract could not answer on its own: what happened, and what
the customer's whole bill is.

`subscription_records` is append-only, one row per commercial event. Flat
columns for everything searched or relied on as evidence — event, customer,
subscription, plan family and version, term, net/tax/gross, currency, tax rate,
reverse charge, Stripe ids — PLUS a versioned JSON copy of the whole snapshot.
Not JSON alone: you cannot query it, and "the amount is in there somewhere" is
poor evidence. Copied, not joined, so a row still answers after the customer,
the plan or the version have gone.

The flat columns describe the TRANSACTION. Gross is what was actually taken;
net and tax are that gross split by the rate that applied on the day. A
discount lowers the taxable amount rather than creating negative VAT, and a
free checkout is recorded as free instead of as paid in full. What was agreed
sits beside it in the snapshot, so a charge that differs from the catalogue is
preserved as a question rather than reconciled away.

The register refuses to be rewritten, in bulk as well as one row at a time —
model events do not fire for `query()->update()`, which is exactly the shape a
careless data fix takes.

`subscription_addons` carries the owner's rule: a customer's total is their
subscription plus their modules, and all of it is frozen at what was agreed.
Price protection covering only the plan would let a module quietly double for
someone who booked it two years ago. A module they have NOT booked is a sale
still to be made, at today's price — so the catalogue is consulted only for
what is not in this table. Several bookings of one module are summed rather
than reduced to one arbitrary row, or the page and the bill would disagree.

Concurrency: one order books one module, enforced by a unique index rather than
a lookup two retries can both pass; cancellation is an atomic claim; and each
booking commits with its own register entry, so a failure cannot leave a sale
without evidence and a retry that finds the booking cannot skip the event.

Verified in the browser: with the module raised from 29,00 € to 59,00 € in the
catalogue, the customer who booked it still sees 29,00 € and a total of
208,00 €, while a new customer is quoted 59,00 €.

436 tests green. Codex review clean after seven rounds.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 13:07:34 +02:00