4 Commits (6b8412f0c394981c091fdba767fc2defe3627124)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
nexxo	f85f57152e	Let the customer buy it themselves, and tab the integrations page ... Every path on the site ended in "anfragen": a mailto: link and a promise to answer the same working day. That is an afternoon of somebody's time per customer, for a product whose whole point is that the machine does the work — and it scales exactly as far as one inbox does. Now: sign in, pick a package, pay, and provisioning starts by itself. The pieces were already there — Stripe holds a Price per plan version (the catalogue sync writes the ids), the webhook opens the contract, the pipeline builds the VM — and what was missing was the checkout session between them. CheckoutController opens one and gets out of the way; the purchase becomes real on the webhook, which stays the only place allowed to believe a payment happened. The success URL is a redirect target and therefore a URL anybody can type, so it says "we are building it", not "you have paid". Nothing in the request may decide the price. The plan key arrives from a form and everything else is re-derived from the catalogue, including the plan VERSION, so a version published while the customer types their card number cannot change what they were quoted. Two cases that are not errors: no capacity is a parked order (already built), and an existing customer is sent to the plan change rather than sold a second, empty cloud that bills twice. The site says what it can keep. "danach wissen Sie … wie Ihre Daten sicher umziehen" was a promise made before seeing the thing it is about: we do not know where a visitor's data is, what shape it is in, or whether it can be moved at all. Migration is named as its own question, looked at first and quoted afterwards. The integrations page gets the settings page's treatment for the same reason: it was one narrow column of six cards, so an operator connecting DNS scrolled past Stripe to reach it and the raw .env editor sat at the bottom of everything. Three tabs by what a section is FOR — services we buy from outside, our own machines, the file underneath — the same axis the page was rebuilt around when it stopped being split by storage mechanism. The tab is in the query string; unlocking survives a switch, because a confirmed password is a session fact and not a property of a tab. The .env tab is Owner-only, like the editor it holds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 19:42:28 +02:00
nexxo	5b63fdb86c	Deliver the storage a customer actually buys ... A booked storage pack was a row in `subscription_addons` and nothing else: priced, frozen, charged every month, and delivered nowhere. Nextcloud's quota came from `instances.quota_gb`, which is the package alone; the disk was sized for the package alone; and on the one occasion a disk did grow — a plan upgrade — the guest never saw it, because nothing stretched the partition or the filesystem over the new space. One authority for the allowance. StorageAllowance adds the package and the booked packs, and everything that needs the figure asks it: the quota step, the downgrade check, the portal, the console, the repair command. It is DERIVED rather than stored — a column would have to be rewritten by booking, cancelling, granting, a grant expiring and a plan change, and the day one of those paths forgot it would be silently wrong in whichever direction costs somebody money. `quota_applied_gb` keeps its own meaning: what the guest was last actually told, which is how a machine with the allowance enforced is told from one where the figure has only ever been a row in our database. Buying it delivers it. BookAddon asks ApplyStorageAllowance for a run on booking AND on cancellation; the new `storage` pipeline grows the virtual disk to the allowance plus the package's own overhead (read off the package — 20/40/50/100 GB on the four catalogue packages — never a ratio invented here), then GrowGuestFilesystem makes the guest see it, then the quota is applied. No cold boot is involved: the data disk is scsi0 and Proxmox's resize on a running guest is a qemu block_resize, so the capacity reaches the guest while it runs. The new step rescans, growparts and grows the filesystem with the tool its type actually needs — ext2/3/4, xfs, btrfs — and fails loudly on one it does not know rather than handing it to resize2fs and hoping. Idempotent end to end: NOCHANGE from growpart is not a failure, and every tool here exits 0 when there is nothing left to grow. The same step now runs in the plan-change pipeline, where an upgrade used to stop one step short of the customer. A downgrade blocked by data gets a way out. The block stays — it is correct — but the check now measures against the target package PLUS the packs the customer already owns, and reports the numbers behind the refusal: what is stored, what would be allowed, how much has to go, and how many packs would cover it instead. The portal offers both routes: book exactly those packs (confirmed in a modal, R23), or delete data and have the fill level measured on demand rather than waiting for the nightly sampler. That reading is taken by DiskUsageProbe, which CollectInstanceTraffic now uses too, so there is one notion of "how full is it" and not two. A plan change keeps booked packs. They were paid for separately and have nothing to do with which package the customer is on; the new package's disk and quota are sized with them included. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 19:13:10 +02:00
nexxo	ec8675861e	Take the order, park it, and say when it will be delivered ... A paid order that no host has room for used to FAIL at the reservation step. The customer has paid by then, so that turned a sale into an incident and left somebody holding money against nothing. The estate is finite and booked thick, so "no host has room right now" is an ordinary Tuesday — it means a machine has to be bought, which takes days. So the order waits instead. poll(), not retry(): the wait is measured in days and must not eat the run's attempt budget. It only fails after PARK_DAYS (14) — long enough to buy, rack and onboard a server over a weekend, short enough that a forgotten order surfaces instead of waiting for ever. Then say so, in the same words on both sides of the payment: - The price sheet marks each package "wird sofort ausgeliefert" or "Bereitstellung in 2-3 Werktagen", read from free capacity rather than written into the page. - The customer's own overview says their cloud is being prepared while it is parked, instead of a stepper standing still for two days under "wird eingerichtet" — which reads as broken. - The console front page shows the same per-package answer, so an operator can see what visitors are being promised. And a capacity page for the decision that follows: who is waiting, what the roomiest host still has, what the queue needs ("3x Start, 1x Business" - the LARGEST parked package sets the minimum machine, because an instance lives on one host), and what such a machine costs today from the provider's live list. It orders nothing: buying a server is a contract, and a bug in a capacity calculation must not sign one. The operator can also say where each parked order goes. A pin is honoured or it waits — never quietly redirected — because placing it elsewhere answers a different question than the one they answered, and they would find out from the finished instance. Two things this shook out: - `current_step` is an INDEX into the pipeline, not the step's key, and it is cast to integer. `where('current_step', 'reserve_resources')` reads as correct and matches step 0 of EVERY pipeline instead. Both lookups go through HostCapacity::parkedRuns() now, which resolves the index and filters by pipeline. - The auction feed sends `hdd_hr` as a list, not a string. Casting it printed "Array" into the console and raised a warning that took the page down with it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 18:50:46 +02:00
nexxo	98d884727a	Warn that a package cannot be placed, before somebody pays for it ... The platform books thick: a package reserves its whole disk_gb — the sold quota plus the machine's own overhead — on ONE host at placement. That is the right choice for a small operator, because nothing can quietly overfill. It has one consequence nobody was being told about: the catalogue goes on offering a package no host has room for, and the first anyone hears of it is a PAID order failing at the reservation step. On the machine this was found on the numbers are stark. 2 x 512 GB NVMe in a mirror is about 400 GB usable; Start reserves 120, Team 540, Business 1050, Enterprise 2100. Three of the four packages on sale cannot be placed at all, and the fourth fits three times. So the console says so now, per package, with the shortfall — "Team needs 540 GB, the roomiest host has 260" — because "buy a server" is not the decision. "Buy a server big enough for what I am selling" is. Two things it deliberately does not do. It does not warn on an installation with no host at all: that is a machine nobody has onboarded yet, it has its own notice, and without the guard a fresh console greeted its operator with one warning per package before they had done anything. And it does not take the overview down when the catalogue cannot be read — a capacity warning does not get to break the page somebody opens when something is already wrong. The largest FREE HOST, never the sum: an instance goes on one machine, so two hosts with 300 GB each cannot take a 540 GB package between them. And when placement does fail, the log now names the shortfall instead of only 'no_capacity'. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 18:20:51 +02:00