3 Commits (823eeaf413c44cbc8b259bee8dbcd8df52303d19)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
nexxo	518bc9aa41	Put the open tab in the address bar, including the first one ... Reported as "die Tabs fehlen in der Query beim Kunden". The binding was there and identical to the settings page — checked in the rendered snapshot, which is where Livewire's JS reads it from — but `except` hid the parameter while the DEFAULT tab was open. So arriving on a customer showed no ?tab= at all, and a link to the page could not say which tab it meant unless the tab happened not to be the first one. From the address bar that is indistinguishable from the feature not existing. No `except` now, on all three tabbed pages: the parameter is there from the first render. And `history: true`, so each tab is a step the back button can take rather than a silent replaceState — which also makes the change unmistakable while clicking. Asserted against the rendered page rather than the component, because the parameter is written client-side from the `url` memo in the snapshot: the memo IS the behaviour, and asserting the property would have passed throughout the bug. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 23:46:13 +02:00
nexxo	f85f57152e	Let the customer buy it themselves, and tab the integrations page ... Every path on the site ended in "anfragen": a mailto: link and a promise to answer the same working day. That is an afternoon of somebody's time per customer, for a product whose whole point is that the machine does the work — and it scales exactly as far as one inbox does. Now: sign in, pick a package, pay, and provisioning starts by itself. The pieces were already there — Stripe holds a Price per plan version (the catalogue sync writes the ids), the webhook opens the contract, the pipeline builds the VM — and what was missing was the checkout session between them. CheckoutController opens one and gets out of the way; the purchase becomes real on the webhook, which stays the only place allowed to believe a payment happened. The success URL is a redirect target and therefore a URL anybody can type, so it says "we are building it", not "you have paid". Nothing in the request may decide the price. The plan key arrives from a form and everything else is re-derived from the catalogue, including the plan VERSION, so a version published while the customer types their card number cannot change what they were quoted. Two cases that are not errors: no capacity is a parked order (already built), and an existing customer is sent to the plan change rather than sold a second, empty cloud that bills twice. The site says what it can keep. "danach wissen Sie … wie Ihre Daten sicher umziehen" was a promise made before seeing the thing it is about: we do not know where a visitor's data is, what shape it is in, or whether it can be moved at all. Migration is named as its own question, looked at first and quoted afterwards. The integrations page gets the settings page's treatment for the same reason: it was one narrow column of six cards, so an operator connecting DNS scrolled past Stripe to reach it and the raw .env editor sat at the bottom of everything. Three tabs by what a section is FOR — services we buy from outside, our own machines, the file underneath — the same axis the page was rebuilt around when it stopped being split by storage mechanism. The tab is in the query string; unlocking survives a switch, because a confirmed password is a session fact and not a property of a tab. The .env tab is Owner-only, like the editor it holds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 19:42:28 +02:00
nexxo	7265799881	Quote what a person pays, and tab the settings page ... Prices. The sheet quoted net, which is the wrong number for one of its two readers: a private customer has no way to add 20 % in their head and no business being surprised by it at checkout. The gross figure is now the big one, with the net underneath for a company's books, and the same rule applies to the module prices further down — a sheet that quotes the package with VAT and the module without it is a sheet whose numbers cannot be added up. The rate is the one on the Finance page, the same one an invoice uses; a percentage written into the template would be the second source that makes the two disagree. "zzgl. einmaliger Einrichtung" had run for months without ever naming a figure, which leaves a visitor knowing only that there is one. It is a field on the Finance page now and prints with the price. Zero removes the sentence — and the comparison card that listed the fee as the honest downside of the offer — rather than admitting to a cost that is not charged. Layout. Four packages in 1120px left each card 202px of text, which is what broke "Bereitstellung in 2-3 Werktagen" over two lines and made the cards look pressed against each other. The pricing section is wider than the rest of the page (only it: the reading columns elsewhere are narrow on purpose, a price sheet is four columns that must be comparable at a glance), the gap between cards is larger, and the delivery line is short enough to fit with whitespace-nowrap to keep it that way. Navigation. VPN moves from Betrieb to System: the tunnel is not a task of the day, it is how the console reaches the estate at all. Settings. The page had grown to three headed sections in one column with the operator's own password somewhere in the middle. It is tabbed now, and two-factor enrolment is one of the tabs instead of a menu entry of its own — it is a setting, and it was the one thing an operator had to leave this page to change about their own access. Same component, no second copy of the enrolment logic; it still answers at its own route because RequireOperatorTwoFactor sends an operator there who may not open anything else yet, this page included. The open tab lives in the query string, so a reload, a bookmark and the back button all land where the operator was. That matters here more than elsewhere: the installation tab refreshes itself while an update runs, and a tab kept only in the component would drop them back to the first one mid-deployment. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 19:18:10 +02:00