Commit Graph

4 Commits (880b5f19982d51c9ecf42fdaf3b2e51fe5163643)

Author SHA1 Message Date
nexxo 865fd16f58 Put the price recognition back, all 3526 lines of it
2321854 removed it. That commit's own work — discarding an unconfirmed
registration and sweeping abandoned ones — is untouched and correct; what went
with it was every file of the Stripe price adoption merged an hour earlier:
AdoptStripePrice, IdempotencyKey, the unique-index migration, both test files,
the spec, the plan, and the edits in six more.

Nothing was lost. The commits stayed in history and the files stayed on disk,
untracked, which is what a staged deletion from a stale tree leaves behind.
Restored from 4eb90c8, the reviewed head, by explicit path — the fourteen paths
2321854 damaged and not one more, so the ten files that commit legitimately
added or changed keep exactly what it gave them.

This is the failure the repo's own rule exists to prevent: stage by path, never
`git add -A`, because a second session's index does not know what a first one
merged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 16:35:55 +02:00
nexxo 2321854967 Discard an unconfirmed registration, and sweep the abandoned ones
tests / pest (push) Failing after 8m17s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 19s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
"Abmelden und neu registrieren" was advice that could not work. Signing out
frees nothing: the address is still held by the unique index, so registering
again with the address somebody meant fails — and every abandoned attempt
stayed in `users` for ever. Reported exactly that way, and it was right.

The button discards the account instead. Only an UNCONFIRMED one, and only
one with nothing behind it: the webhook creates a customer's login from a
paid checkout, so a user can sit on this page unconfirmed while already
having a contract, and deleting that is data loss dressed up as a
convenience. It refuses and says where to go. A confirmed account is closed,
not discarded — that is ConfirmCloseAccount, with an invoice history behind
it.

R23: confirmed in a modal. The modal mutates nothing; it dispatches the event
the page listens for, so the checks stay in the one place they already are
rather than being duplicated where they could drift.

And nothing has to be discarded by hand. clupilot:prune-unverified removes
registrations nobody confirmed after five days — long enough for somebody who
signed up on a Friday and found the mail in a spam folder on Monday, short
enough that a typo does not hold the correct address for a month. It skips a
confirmed account whatever its age, and any account with a customer record
behind it, matched on user_id AND on the address, because either link means
somebody is a customer. Every removal is logged with the address: a line that
disappears is what somebody asks about later, and a count answers nothing.

The deadline is said on the page as well as in the mail. Somebody who never
received the mail is looking at the page, and the deadline is the reason they
do not have to do anything about an attempt they abandon.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 14:08:02 +02:00
nexxo dba5df5d1e One row per Stripe price on the module side too
The plan register has had this since 2026_07_30_110000. The module register
never did, so two rows could claim one Price and archiving the one would have
withdrawn the Price the other was still selling — Block D of the real-run
handoff.

It is also the net under the adoption step: at a VAT rate of nought both
treatments charge the same amount, and the check that refuses an already-claimed
Price is then the only thing keeping the two apart.

Duplicates are deleted, not archived. An archived row goes on claiming the id
and a unique index knows nothing about archived_at; the row rebuilds itself on
the next ensure(), and subscription_addons holds the Stripe id as text rather
than a foreign key, so no booking loses its price.

AddonPrices::remember()'s catch comment described the guard as the only thing
standing between two rows and one Price; now that the index exists, rewritten
to describe it as the net under that guard instead.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 12:47:34 +02:00
nexxo 36cb684d8b Write down what the audits found and what a real run needs
tests / pest (push) Failing after 8m0s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 20s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 08:58:59 +02:00