7 Commits (880b5f19982d51c9ecf42fdaf3b2e51fe5163643)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
nexxo	ff92466b47	Give the order a checkout page, and stop hiding what a year costs ... **There was no checkout page.** The package list posted straight to Stripe, so the last thing a customer saw in this product's design was a grid of cards and the next was somebody else's form asking for a card number. What they were buying, what it costs in total, what happens afterwards and what they were agreeing to were never stated in one place. App\Livewire\Checkout is that place: the package and its figures on the left, a sticky summary on the right — net, the saving where there is one, the setup fee, the tax, what is due today, and what will be charged after it. Every figure comes from the catalogue, TaxTreatment and SetupFee, the same three the checkout itself reads; nothing is recomputed, because a summary that works out its own total is a second answer waiting to disagree with the one Stripe is handed. **The terms acceptance moved to where the money is spent.** It sat at the top of the package list as a condition of LOOKING at prices, with every button dead beneath it. It is a condition of buying, so it is now at the foot of the summary, directly above the button — after the total, which is the order those three things are read in. The package list has no form on it at all now; its buttons are links. **The page used the left half of a 1240px shell.** A 68-character title, a switch under it and an 80-character footnote, beside a grid that used the whole width. Now: a header band with the name left and the term switch right, where a control belongs, and a closing band of three columns instead of a paragraph trailing off. **The yearly view showed the monthly equivalent as its headline**, so on a package with no free months the big figure did not move at all when the switch was thrown — the page looked like it had ignored the click. The headline is the price of the term in the unit it is charged in; what a year works out to per month is said underneath. Same on the public sheet. **The switch was unreadable.** `text-on-ink` is not in this palette — the ink pairing is bg-ink/text-bg, as x-ui.button has always had it — so the label kept its inherited grey on a near-black pill. And its shell was rounded-lg with rounded-md options inside: two radius scales, one of them Tailwind's untokenised 6px. One scale now, nested. **The mails drew an empty orange tile.** The mark's ascent lives in an SVG the site loads and a mail cannot — Gmail strips inline SVG, Outlook renders with Word, and this layout carries no image by design. The shape is drawn with a character every mail font has, white on the accent tile, with the whole wordmark beside it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 16:00:08 +02:00
nexxo	fed4acf31c	Accept terms instead of a start date, and fix the sender no server accepts ... **The test mail was rejected: "553 5.7.1 Sender address rejected: not owned by user no-reply@…".** Every purpose mailbox here has its own SMTP account, and a mail server lets an account send only from the address it owns. Mail::to() hands back a pending mail bound to the DEFAULT mailer and sendNow() then ignores the mailer the mailable asked for, so a mail addressed support@ went out over the no-reply@ login. It sends through the mailable's own mailer now, and the cloud-ready preview — the one mailable with no mailbox at all — takes the provisioning mailbox like the real notification does. Writing the test for that found the same bug in production code: **InvoiceMail and OrderConfirmationMail set their From to billing@ and never named a mailer**, so both went out over mail.default's no-reply@ login. On this installation no customer had ever received an invoice mail or an order confirmation; they rendered perfectly, queued without complaint and were refused at the door. MailSenderOwnershipTest now scans for the mismatch: a mail that takes a mailbox From must use that mailbox's mailer. **The box on the order page accepts the terms now**, not an immediate start. It used to carry the whole FAGG §16 sentence, which read like a choice between "now" and "in fourteen days" — and there is no second option. The terms are what regulate the sale, so they had to exist: resources/views/legal/terms.blade.php replaces the placeholder with fourteen sections written from what this software actually does — the delivery, the capacity queue, the full refund on withdrawal, the cancellation at period end, the deletion deadlines. The company data comes from CompanyProfile, so the page and the invoices cannot drift. No availability figure and no liability cap has been invented. No order goes through without it: the button is unusable until the box is ticked and says why, and CheckoutController still refuses server-side — the browser half refuses nothing. The request field is `terms_accepted`; the Stripe metadata key stays `immediate_start`, because a session opened before a deploy is paid after it and the webhook would find nothing under a new name. **"Wird der Account nach fünf Tagen gelöscht?"** Only an unconfirmed one. That was the whole of what we said, so the answer looked like yes. The second rule now exists and is stated: PruneDormantAccounts removes a confirmed account after a year when it never had a package — no customer record at all, which is where every order, contract and seven-year invoice hangs. A fortnight's notice goes out first, once, and `dormant_warned_at` is what permits the deletion: an account whose warning never went out is never removed. Signing in resets the clock, measured off the device rows because users has no last_login_at. Both deadlines are said in the portal settings, on the verification page, and in the terms — each reading the number off the command that enforces it. Also: the wordmark scan matched any element whose text merely BEGINS with the company name, which a paragraph of terms does. It looks for the lockup form now (no whitespace after the tag), which is what it was always about. The seven checkout tests in the parallel session's files were posting the old field name and now post the new one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 15:22:35 +02:00
nexxo	c354ad1463	Make mails readable on a phone, and let an operator look at one ... Three things the owner reported, and one sentence that promised something this product does not do. **The mails had a fixed width.** components/mail/layout.blade.php set width="600" and width:600px, so every phone showed a 600px canvas in a 390px window and one had to scroll sideways to read a sentence. Now the table is width="100%" with max-width:600px — fluid, with 600 as a ceiling rather than a floor. A mail cannot fix this with a media query (Outlook renders with Word and drops <style> blocks), which is why the whole file is inline attributes and why the shrinking has to be built in. Side padding went 40px -> 24px in the layout and in all nine mail views: 40 each side leaves 278px of a 390px screen to read in. **There was no way to look at a mail.** An invoice mail needs an invoice, a maintenance announcement needs a window, and "register an account to see whether the confirmation reads well" is not a workflow — which is how the fixed width survived for months. App\Services\Mail\MailPreviews builds all nine from sample data, every record with make() and never create(), so a preview leaves no invoice, order or window behind and draws no number from a series. Two ways to see one: in a tab as the document itself, or sent to the signed-in operator's own address. There is no recipient field — that would be a form for mailing strangers. sendNow(), not send(): every mailable here implements ShouldQueue, and send() defers to the queue for those, which would have put a failure in a worker's log while the button reported success to somebody waiting for the mail. The test caught that. **The booking page had no shell.** Order declared layouts.portal — the bare shell the sign-in pages use, no navigation and no padding — so the page sat flush against the top and bottom of the window with no way back to anything. layouts.portal-app, like every other portal page. **The consent box said something untrue.** Its refusal read "otherwise we can only build your cloud once the withdrawal period has ended", which describes a path that does not exist: nothing here delivers fourteen days later, and an unticked box simply means no order. Said plainly now, and said on the page before somebody runs into the refusal. Also: GrantedPlanPortalTest asserted assertDontSee('179'), which matches any id containing those digits — and ids climb through a suite run because a rolled-back transaction does not reset an auto-increment counter. It passed alone and failed in company. Asserts on '179,00' now, which is what a leaked price would actually look like. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 14:50:37 +02:00
nexxo	8ca0d4d257	Say the same thing to the customer, the register and the bank ... Five places where the product told somebody a figure that nothing behind it produced. **The invoice page showed five invoices nobody was ever issued.** A mock that outlived its purpose: CP-2026-0003 to CP-2026-0007, a prefix belonging to no configured series, all "paid", a spend curve from 179 to 198 € and a next charge of 198 € on 01.08.2026 — behind ['auth','verified','customer.active'], so every signed-in customer saw it. Their real invoices existed in `invoices`, were rendered as PDFs and mailed to them, and appeared nowhere in the portal at all. The page now lists their own documents, newest first, with the numbers, dates and totals off the frozen snapshot, a Storno marked as one, and a download. The PDF route resolves the document against the signed-in customer in the query — a URL anybody can type is not made private by not printing it. No next charge and no chart: nothing here computes what Stripe will take next cycle, and a figure nobody has worked out is worse than a blank space. **The setup fee was quoted everywhere and charged nowhere.** On the price sheet, on the booking page, set by the operator in the console — and CompanyProfile::setupFeeCents() had no reader outside the two sentences that quoted it. It is charged now, as a second non-recurring line on the same checkout session, which Stripe puts on the initial invoice only. `orders.setup_fee_cents` records how much of the charge it was, so the whole total still goes back on a withdrawal while the register holds the PACKAGE's charge against the contract price and the invoice prints the fee as a line of its own. The booking page was also quoting the fee NET under the same sentence the website quotes GROSS — 99,00 against 118,80 — and now quotes what will be taken. **An upgrade click cancelled a booked downgrade and delivered nothing.** Nothing in this application marks a cart order paid, so the customer traded a downgrade they had genuinely booked for a cart line that would never be fulfilled. The booking now stands until the upgrade actually lands on the contract, where ApplyPlanChange clears it. The fulfilment seam is reachable for every type that can be paid — a module and a storage pack book through BookAddon, which was the missing path from a paid order to a SubscriptionAddon and left AddonPrices, SyncStripeAddonItems and clupilot:end-cancelled-addons with no caller behind a payment. A paid traffic pack logs an error rather than pretending: the metered allowance is a standing count of packs while a top-up is sold for one month, and which of the two is meant is not a guess to make here. That no path to `paid` exists yet is now stated in both places rather than in one. **The proof register called correct charges wrong.** expected_gross_cents used the CUSTOMER's rate, which is zero under reverse charge, against the domestic gross Stripe actually took — so matches_catalogue was false for every EU business sale charged exactly the advertised amount, and for every renewal on a contract with a module, which was held against `price_cents` alone. It compares against TaxTreatment::chargedCents() and against the whole term now. Where no money moved, charged and the flag are null instead of the expected figure agreeing with itself, and a plan change records the terms with the pro-rata figures in the snapshot rather than money that arrives again on Stripe's proration invoice. **The seller's own VAT id was on the invoice, unlabelled**, between the register number and the court. Labelled — and the footer's composition moved out of the TCPDF method, because inside one the only way to read what it says is to render a PDF and un-subset its fonts. One test enshrined a figure the code does not produce: a reverse-charge purchase recorded with no charged amount, asserting 17900/0/17900, where OpenSubscription always passes the charged figure and a real one records 21480/0/21480. Another asserted that an upgrade click cancels a booked downgrade. Full suite: 1676 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 01:30:24 +02:00
nexxo	f02e86769b	Charge the price the website shows, and hand a withdrawal back in full ... Stripe was charging the catalogue's NET figure while the document added the domestic rate on top: a customer quoted 214,80 paid 179,00 and was then invoiced for VAT nobody had collected. Under para 11(12) UStG that VAT is owed to the tax office whether or not it ever arrived, so every document issued created a liability against revenue that did not contain it. The Stripe Price now carries the GROSS figure. price_cents stays net - it is frozen onto every contract and PlanChange prorates against it, so redefining it would corrupt every pro-rata sum ever computed. Only the amount at the till moved, and it is formed by the one call TaxTreatment already answers for the price sheet and for the invoice, so displayed, charged and invoiced cannot drift apart. Stripe's automatic_tax is deliberately not used. TaxTreatment is the single tax authority here, and a second rate computed by Stripe would take 19 % from a German consumer while our document said 20 %. A Stripe Price cannot be edited, so a changed figure means a new Price and the old one archived - which stops it being SOLD and leaves every subscription already on it billing the old amount for ever. stripe:reprice-subscriptions is the second half, and a command of its own because it touches live money. A withdrawing consumer is refunded in full, as the owner decided. That is more generous than FAGG para 16 requires, and it makes the express-request consent the statute hinges on irrelevant - so the gate is gone rather than left looking load-bearing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 22:42:02 +02:00
nexxo	6d7c2bdf35	Ask whether they are a consumer, and let one change their mind ... Three things the product owed its customers and did not have. **Who is on the other side.** There was no consumer/business flag anywhere, and `vat_id` was standing in for one — which it cannot: a business without a VAT number is an ordinary small business, and a consumer with one does not exist. It is asked at sign-up now, correctable in the portal, and NULL where nobody has been asked. Unknown is read as CONSUMER everywhere it decides a right, because that mistake costs us a refund while the other one takes a statutory right away from somebody who has it. Reverse charge asks the recorded type instead of the number: an explicit consumer is charged the domestic rate whatever `vat_id` says — previously they were not, and anyone could zero their own VAT by getting a number verified. An unrecorded type still falls back to the verified number, so no contract that is already running changes rate. **The fourteen-day right of withdrawal** (FAGG, §312g BGB), for consumers only, at every door: the window is stamped on the contract when it is concluded, the customer exercises it from the portal, an operator records one that arrived by telephone or post, and both go through one action that refuses a business customer on the server rather than by hiding a card. The money follows the paperwork rather than being computed beside it. The invoice is cancelled by a Storno with its own gapless number — nothing is ever edited or deleted — a new invoice states the pro-rata value of the service actually delivered (FAGG §16, by days over the term paid for), and the refund is exactly the difference between the two documents. Where the consumer never expressly asked for the service to begin at once, they owe nothing and the whole amount goes back. `StripeClient::refund()` is new, keyed so a retry cannot send the money twice. The service ends through EndInstanceService and the `cancellation_scheduled` machinery that was already there. **The cancel button for modules.** BookAddon::cancelAtPeriodEnd() had no caller in the interface at all, so a customer could book a recurring charge in two clicks and had no way to stop it. It is on the module card now, with the date it runs until and a way back while the cancellation is still pending — and putting a module back settles nothing, because the term it was cancelled for was paid for in advance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 21:06:06 +02:00
nexxo	f85f57152e	Let the customer buy it themselves, and tab the integrations page ... Every path on the site ended in "anfragen": a mailto: link and a promise to answer the same working day. That is an afternoon of somebody's time per customer, for a product whose whole point is that the machine does the work — and it scales exactly as far as one inbox does. Now: sign in, pick a package, pay, and provisioning starts by itself. The pieces were already there — Stripe holds a Price per plan version (the catalogue sync writes the ids), the webhook opens the contract, the pipeline builds the VM — and what was missing was the checkout session between them. CheckoutController opens one and gets out of the way; the purchase becomes real on the webhook, which stays the only place allowed to believe a payment happened. The success URL is a redirect target and therefore a URL anybody can type, so it says "we are building it", not "you have paid". Nothing in the request may decide the price. The plan key arrives from a form and everything else is re-derived from the catalogue, including the plan VERSION, so a version published while the customer types their card number cannot change what they were quoted. Two cases that are not errors: no capacity is a parked order (already built), and an existing customer is sent to the plan change rather than sold a second, empty cloud that bills twice. The site says what it can keep. "danach wissen Sie … wie Ihre Daten sicher umziehen" was a promise made before seeing the thing it is about: we do not know where a visitor's data is, what shape it is in, or whether it can be moved at all. Migration is named as its own question, looked at first and quoted afterwards. The integrations page gets the settings page's treatment for the same reason: it was one narrow column of six cards, so an operator connecting DNS scrolled past Stripe to reach it and the raw .env editor sat at the bottom of everything. Three tabs by what a section is FOR — services we buy from outside, our own machines, the file underneath — the same axis the page was rebuilt around when it stopped being split by storage mechanism. The tab is in the query string; unlocking survives a switch, because a confirmed password is a session fact and not a property of a tab. The .env tab is Owner-only, like the editor it holds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 19:42:28 +02:00