3 Commits (8ca0d4d257c267bcd2d71ade2aa05fa4be8b736e)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
nexxo	8ca0d4d257	Say the same thing to the customer, the register and the bank ... Five places where the product told somebody a figure that nothing behind it produced. **The invoice page showed five invoices nobody was ever issued.** A mock that outlived its purpose: CP-2026-0003 to CP-2026-0007, a prefix belonging to no configured series, all "paid", a spend curve from 179 to 198 € and a next charge of 198 € on 01.08.2026 — behind ['auth','verified','customer.active'], so every signed-in customer saw it. Their real invoices existed in `invoices`, were rendered as PDFs and mailed to them, and appeared nowhere in the portal at all. The page now lists their own documents, newest first, with the numbers, dates and totals off the frozen snapshot, a Storno marked as one, and a download. The PDF route resolves the document against the signed-in customer in the query — a URL anybody can type is not made private by not printing it. No next charge and no chart: nothing here computes what Stripe will take next cycle, and a figure nobody has worked out is worse than a blank space. **The setup fee was quoted everywhere and charged nowhere.** On the price sheet, on the booking page, set by the operator in the console — and CompanyProfile::setupFeeCents() had no reader outside the two sentences that quoted it. It is charged now, as a second non-recurring line on the same checkout session, which Stripe puts on the initial invoice only. `orders.setup_fee_cents` records how much of the charge it was, so the whole total still goes back on a withdrawal while the register holds the PACKAGE's charge against the contract price and the invoice prints the fee as a line of its own. The booking page was also quoting the fee NET under the same sentence the website quotes GROSS — 99,00 against 118,80 — and now quotes what will be taken. **An upgrade click cancelled a booked downgrade and delivered nothing.** Nothing in this application marks a cart order paid, so the customer traded a downgrade they had genuinely booked for a cart line that would never be fulfilled. The booking now stands until the upgrade actually lands on the contract, where ApplyPlanChange clears it. The fulfilment seam is reachable for every type that can be paid — a module and a storage pack book through BookAddon, which was the missing path from a paid order to a SubscriptionAddon and left AddonPrices, SyncStripeAddonItems and clupilot:end-cancelled-addons with no caller behind a payment. A paid traffic pack logs an error rather than pretending: the metered allowance is a standing count of packs while a top-up is sold for one month, and which of the two is meant is not a guess to make here. That no path to `paid` exists yet is now stated in both places rather than in one. **The proof register called correct charges wrong.** expected_gross_cents used the CUSTOMER's rate, which is zero under reverse charge, against the domestic gross Stripe actually took — so matches_catalogue was false for every EU business sale charged exactly the advertised amount, and for every renewal on a contract with a module, which was held against `price_cents` alone. It compares against TaxTreatment::chargedCents() and against the whole term now. Where no money moved, charged and the flag are null instead of the expected figure agreeing with itself, and a plan change records the terms with the pro-rata figures in the snapshot rather than money that arrives again on Stripe's proration invoice. **The seller's own VAT id was on the invoice, unlabelled**, between the register number and the court. Labelled — and the footer's composition moved out of the TCPDF method, because inside one the only way to read what it says is to render a PDF and un-subset its fonts. One test enshrined a figure the code does not produce: a reverse-charge purchase recorded with no charged amount, asserting 17900/0/17900, where OpenSubscription always passes the charged figure and a real one records 21480/0/21480. Another asserted that an upgrade click cancels a booked downgrade. Full suite: 1676 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 01:30:24 +02:00
nexxo	35b312d5ef	Invoice every renewal, and tell Stripe when the package changes ... Two things Stripe was doing on its own, without us. **A renewal produced no invoice and no mail.** InvoiceMail went out from exactly one place — the first purchase — so a customer paying every month for a year received one invoice, for month one. Stripe already says when the money lands: invoice.paid with billing_reason subscription_cycle. What was missing was the document. A renewal has no Order behind it, and one was not invented for the occasion: an Order is something a customer bought, and writing a purchase nobody made would corrupt the record of what they have actually ordered. IssueInvoice::forBilledPeriod() issues from the CONTRACT instead, at its frozen net price, for the term Stripe billed. Idempotent against the Stripe invoice id, which is unique in the database rather than checked in PHP — and because the number is drawn inside the same transaction as the row, a redelivery takes its number back with it and the series keeps its sequence. Nothing in the paperwork can fail the webhook: issuing and mailing are both caught and logged, exactly as confirmByMail() does. Only a cycle renewal gets a document. The checkout's own invoice already has one; an upgrade's proration was worked out against Stripe's boundaries and would not match a document written from our snapshot; a charge raised by hand is for something this catalogue cannot describe. All three stay in the register, and are logged once as money no document of ours covers. **After a plan change, Stripe went on billing the old price.** There was no way to move a subscription onto another price at all, so a customer who upgraded paid for the smaller package every month afterwards. The client can now swap one, the item id it needs is learnt from Stripe's own events (and asked for once, for contracts older than the column), and the behaviour is chosen per direction: an upgrade settles immediately, so the cycle invoice stays exactly the contract price the renewal document states; a downgrade lands at the period boundary and settles nothing. A granted contract has no Stripe subscription and is left untouched. A change that reaches the machine and not Stripe is never rolled back — it is parked on the contract with the error and the behaviour it needed, logged as an error, and retried hourly by clupilot:sync-stripe-subscriptions. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 19:35:15 +02:00
nexxo	34874adec3	Apply a bought plan change instead of only pricing it ... PlanChange could say what a move would cost and whether it was allowed, and that was all it could do. Billing::purchase() wrote an upgrade order and nothing ever consumed it: same snapshot, same machine, same quota. A customer could pay for a bigger package and receive nothing. ApplyPlanChange is now the single place a change lands — it moves the contract onto the target's current version, writes one register row, settles the custom domain, and starts a run that resizes the machine. Applying the same order twice is a no-op, enforced by a unique event key rather than by a check two callers could both pass. Two things a plan change must not do, and now does not. A disk is never shrunk — Proxmox cannot, so the QUOTA shrinks instead, which is what was sold anyway. And a live machine is never rebooted as a side effect: cores and RAM are written, and where they need a restart the instance says so where an operator and the customer can both see it. The storage allowance also joins the build pipeline. ApplyStorageQuota was written for plan changes and ran only there, so a brand-new customer still got no quota at all — quota_gb reached the instance row and stopped, and every package delivered the whole disk. The test guarding that pipeline only counted its steps, which is how a list missing the one step that makes a package's storage real stayed green for its whole life. It now names the step. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 17:18:55 +02:00