3 Commits (8ca0d4d257c267bcd2d71ade2aa05fa4be8b736e)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
nexxo	8ca0d4d257	Say the same thing to the customer, the register and the bank ... Five places where the product told somebody a figure that nothing behind it produced. **The invoice page showed five invoices nobody was ever issued.** A mock that outlived its purpose: CP-2026-0003 to CP-2026-0007, a prefix belonging to no configured series, all "paid", a spend curve from 179 to 198 € and a next charge of 198 € on 01.08.2026 — behind ['auth','verified','customer.active'], so every signed-in customer saw it. Their real invoices existed in `invoices`, were rendered as PDFs and mailed to them, and appeared nowhere in the portal at all. The page now lists their own documents, newest first, with the numbers, dates and totals off the frozen snapshot, a Storno marked as one, and a download. The PDF route resolves the document against the signed-in customer in the query — a URL anybody can type is not made private by not printing it. No next charge and no chart: nothing here computes what Stripe will take next cycle, and a figure nobody has worked out is worse than a blank space. **The setup fee was quoted everywhere and charged nowhere.** On the price sheet, on the booking page, set by the operator in the console — and CompanyProfile::setupFeeCents() had no reader outside the two sentences that quoted it. It is charged now, as a second non-recurring line on the same checkout session, which Stripe puts on the initial invoice only. `orders.setup_fee_cents` records how much of the charge it was, so the whole total still goes back on a withdrawal while the register holds the PACKAGE's charge against the contract price and the invoice prints the fee as a line of its own. The booking page was also quoting the fee NET under the same sentence the website quotes GROSS — 99,00 against 118,80 — and now quotes what will be taken. **An upgrade click cancelled a booked downgrade and delivered nothing.** Nothing in this application marks a cart order paid, so the customer traded a downgrade they had genuinely booked for a cart line that would never be fulfilled. The booking now stands until the upgrade actually lands on the contract, where ApplyPlanChange clears it. The fulfilment seam is reachable for every type that can be paid — a module and a storage pack book through BookAddon, which was the missing path from a paid order to a SubscriptionAddon and left AddonPrices, SyncStripeAddonItems and clupilot:end-cancelled-addons with no caller behind a payment. A paid traffic pack logs an error rather than pretending: the metered allowance is a standing count of packs while a top-up is sold for one month, and which of the two is meant is not a guess to make here. That no path to `paid` exists yet is now stated in both places rather than in one. **The proof register called correct charges wrong.** expected_gross_cents used the CUSTOMER's rate, which is zero under reverse charge, against the domestic gross Stripe actually took — so matches_catalogue was false for every EU business sale charged exactly the advertised amount, and for every renewal on a contract with a module, which was held against `price_cents` alone. It compares against TaxTreatment::chargedCents() and against the whole term now. Where no money moved, charged and the flag are null instead of the expected figure agreeing with itself, and a plan change records the terms with the pro-rata figures in the snapshot rather than money that arrives again on Stripe's proration invoice. **The seller's own VAT id was on the invoice, unlabelled**, between the register number and the court. Labelled — and the footer's composition moved out of the TCPDF method, because inside one the only way to read what it says is to render a PDF and un-subset its fonts. One test enshrined a figure the code does not produce: a reverse-charge purchase recorded with no charged amount, asserting 17900/0/17900, where OpenSubscription always passes the charged figure and a real one records 21480/0/21480. Another asserted that an upgrade click cancels a booked downgrade. Full suite: 1676 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 01:30:24 +02:00
nexxo	e0c109c449	Ask for the express request to begin, and send it to Stripe ... The withdrawal machinery has always read `immediate_start` off the checkout session's metadata — StripeWebhookController stamps `immediate_start_consent_at` from it, WithdrawalRight refunds pro rata when it is there and in full when it is not. The checkout never put it there. So every contract concluded through this application carried no consent, and a withdrawal on day thirteen of a running cloud took back the whole amount however many days the machine had run. That is the lawful outcome without the consent, and it was the only outcome available. Now the checkout asks. The box is required — validated `accepted`, not `present`, because an empty field is what an unticked checkbox sends and a consent that can be produced by leaving something blank is not a consent — and the metadata carries exactly the string '1' the webhook compares against. One box for the page rather than one per card: the sentence is the statutory wording and four copies of it is a wall nobody reads. The forms carry it as a hidden field bound to that box, and the buy buttons stay disabled until it is ticked. With JavaScript off the field arrives empty and the server refuses with the sentence explaining why — the safe direction to fail in. Ticking a box in a browser was never the record anyway: the record is the timestamp taken when the payment lands. Tested at both seams and along the whole chain: refused without it, refused for '', '0' and a word that is not yes, carried to Stripe as '1', and a webhook carrying it lands as a timestamp on the order while one without it lands as null. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 21:19:03 +02:00
nexxo	f85f57152e	Let the customer buy it themselves, and tab the integrations page ... Every path on the site ended in "anfragen": a mailto: link and a promise to answer the same working day. That is an afternoon of somebody's time per customer, for a product whose whole point is that the machine does the work — and it scales exactly as far as one inbox does. Now: sign in, pick a package, pay, and provisioning starts by itself. The pieces were already there — Stripe holds a Price per plan version (the catalogue sync writes the ids), the webhook opens the contract, the pipeline builds the VM — and what was missing was the checkout session between them. CheckoutController opens one and gets out of the way; the purchase becomes real on the webhook, which stays the only place allowed to believe a payment happened. The success URL is a redirect target and therefore a URL anybody can type, so it says "we are building it", not "you have paid". Nothing in the request may decide the price. The plan key arrives from a form and everything else is re-derived from the catalogue, including the plan VERSION, so a version published while the customer types their card number cannot change what they were quoted. Two cases that are not errors: no capacity is a parked order (already built), and an existing customer is sent to the plan change rather than sold a second, empty cloud that bills twice. The site says what it can keep. "danach wissen Sie … wie Ihre Daten sicher umziehen" was a promise made before seeing the thing it is about: we do not know where a visitor's data is, what shape it is in, or whether it can be moved at all. Migration is named as its own question, looked at first and quoted afterwards. The integrations page gets the settings page's treatment for the same reason: it was one narrow column of six cards, so an operator connecting DNS scrolled past Stripe to reach it and the raw .env editor sat at the bottom of everything. Three tabs by what a section is FOR — services we buy from outside, our own machines, the file underneath — the same axis the page was rebuilt around when it stopped being split by storage mechanism. The tab is in the query string; unlocking survives a switch, because a confirmed password is a session fact and not a property of a tab. The .env tab is Owner-only, like the editor it holds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 19:42:28 +02:00