Die alte Hetzner-DNS-API ist abgeschaltet (301 auf die Weboberflaeche).
Jede Bereitstellung starb in ConfigureDnsAndTls, nachdem der Kunde bezahlt
hatte. HttpHetznerDnsClient und DnsTokenCheck sprechen jetzt die Cloud-API:
Bearer statt Auth-API-Token, RRSets ueber {name}/{typ} statt Record-IDs, der
Zonen-Lookup entfaellt. Gegen das Live-Konto gemessen, nicht geraten.
Drei Fallen, die am Konto gemessen wurden: TXT-Werte muessen in
Anfuehrungszeichen (sonst 422, was als read_only gemeldet worden waere), ein
Name mit Zonensuffix wird STILL angenommen (201), und der Fake gab andere IDs
aus als der echte Client -- zwoelf Tests waren gruen ueber einem Abbau, der im
Betrieb geworfen haette.
Bereitschaftspunkte, die nur eine Shell beheben konnte, sind jetzt bedienbar:
SSH-Schluesselpaar erzeugen (Ed25519 ueber phpseclib, privater Teil direkt in
den Tresor), Stripe-Katalog abgleichen (Warteschlange, Trockenlauf, Ausgabe
wortgleich), Mailzustellung als Schalter statt MAIL_MAILER, Neustart der
Arbeiterprozesse. Stripe hat jetzt alle drei Werte in der Konsole: Secret Key,
Signatur-Secret (Tresor, je Modus getrennt) und Publishable Key (Klartext).
Codex-Review (R15), zwei P1 behoben: der Signaturschluessel faellt nicht mehr
vom Live- in den Testplatz, und eine Record-ID aus der alten API macht einen
Host nicht mehr unloeschbar -- was adressierbar ist, wandelt eine Migration um,
der Rest wird beim Loeschen laut uebergangen statt geworfen.
2109 Tests gruen.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
One real conflict, in SyncStripeCatalogue::handle(), and both sides were right.
Main's parallel work resolves the adoption singletons and takes "before" counts
so a run can tell created from adopted. The operating-mode work refuses a
catalogue whose stored objects belong to the other mode, and records which mode
the catalogue now belongs to.
Kept both, with the mode guard first. It REFUSES, so it must not run behind
anything that has already built state; the counters only need to be in place
before the create loop, and they still are. Reversing that order would have the
command resolve singletons and take counts on a catalogue it is about to reject.
2017 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three sentences left over from the wave before, all of the kind this branch
exists to end.
- "Every active Price" was one word short. activePricesFor() sends
`type: recurring` as well as `active: true`, so a one-time Price is never
listed — which made the hand-built-payment-link sentence false for a one-time
link: neither listed nor archived. Both places say `recurring` now, and the
docblock says why the filter is not a gap: createPrice() always sends
`recurring[interval]` and is the only call that mints a Price at one of our
Products, so the filter can only ever hide somebody else's one-time Price.
A filter left out of a sentence is a gap the next reader goes looking for.
- The sweep test file still opened "The orphans nobody can adopt" — the exact
narrowing the command's own docblock had to be corrected away from. It happens
to describe the fixtures, which are all metadata-less, so it now says that
instead of claiming it of the command.
- The design doc called --archive "harmlos" seven lines above the correction
establishing that it is not, for an adoptable orphan. A document that
contradicts itself seven lines apart teaches nobody anything.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
stripe:sweep-orphan-prices described itself as listing "what AdoptStripePrice
will not take over". It computes nothing of the sort: it lists every active
Price at one of our Products that no register row knows, adoptable or not — the
only question it asks is whether a row holds the id. And then it invited the
destructive path, with no word anywhere about running stripe:sync-catalogue
first.
Following that advice can make a plan unsellable. Archive an orphan the next
sync would have adopted and the sync can no longer see it: activePricesFor()
asks Stripe for active prices only, so adoption returns null and createPrice()
fires under the same key the crashed run used. For twenty-four hours Stripe
answers a repeated key by replaying the stored response — the archived Price's
id, in the body it had while it was live. The register writes it down as live,
and the checkout is refused. This is the same class of defect the branch exists
against: a comment that was eloquent and wrong.
- The docblock now says what the command lists, names the twenty-four-hour
replay so nobody has to rediscover it, and the ordering requirement is in
$description and printed on every path that found something, --archive
included. The reassurance that archiving is harmless is now scoped to what
THIS codebase sells; a payment link an operator built by hand against one of
our Products is withdrawn all the same, and says so.
- stripe:sync-catalogue --dry-run says "created or adopted" again. A dry run
counts intents without calling ensure(), so it cannot know which Stripe
already holds — and a dry run is the first thing an operator runs after an
interrupted one. The live line keeps both figures, where they are knowable.
- The sweep's plan side gets a test: an orphan at a family Product is reported
and a known plan Price never is. Deleting either half of the lookup turns it
red; the five tests it joins all stayed green for the products() half.
- The throttle test pinned "once" and neither "per price" nor "per day". A key
mutated to a constant would have silenced every orphan after the first and
kept it green — the silent no-op the branch is built against. It now plants a
second orphan, and travels a day to hear the first one again.
- Two of my own documents corrected. The spec sentence claiming an adoptable
orphan never appears in this list is what the implementation faithfully built;
it holds only if a sync has run since the orphan appeared, which nothing
enforced. And the two adoption classes do not carry the same run log:
$adoptions on the Price side, $duplicates on the Product side.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The dry-run guard was copied from stripe:sync-catalogue, where it is right:
that command's --dry-run touches nothing, because everything it compares
already lives in our own tables. This command has no such local-only mode —
the report IS a live activePricesFor() call, dry-run or not — so `! $dryRun &&`
made the guard fire only on the one path that would have worked anyway. A
--dry-run against an unconfigured account fell straight into
HttpStripeClient's own exception instead of the clean error and self::FAILURE.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The recognition step refuses a price that proves nothing about itself, and that
is right — adopting a stranger's price is worse than minting a second one. It
left an operator with a log line and no way to act on it.
Reports by default and touches nothing. With --archive the orphans stop being
sold, which is harmless for the reason it always is here: Stripe goes on billing
every subscription already on an archived price, and nothing is sold on a price
no row knows.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A figure may only subtract what it counted as an intent in the first place. The
family loop counts a Product before knowing whether it will be adopted or
minted, so an adoption there could honestly be subtracted back out — but
syncModules() has never counted a module's own Product as an intent at all; it
only counts a module's Prices. Reading AdoptStripeProduct::adoptions as one
run-wide delta could not tell the two apart, so a module Product adopted from
an interrupted run silently inflated "adopted" and shrank "created" by exactly
one, for a Product the command never claimed to have made in the first place.
The fix counts the family side locally, at the one call site that already
counts the intent, and leaves a module's Product out of both figures entirely —
adopted or minted, it was never counted, so neither number may move for it.
AdoptStripeProduct::$adoptions is gone with it: nothing reads a singleton-wide
total that cannot be attributed to one side or the other, and keeping it around
unread would be exactly the kind of state this codebase does not leave lying
about.
The duplicate-product report had the same shape of bug one line down: it read
straight off the singleton's list with no before/after snapshot, so a second
handle() call in one process would reprint a duplicate an earlier run already
named. Sliced to what this run itself added, the same way the counters beside
it already were.
Also: the unread `$charged` line in the adoption test that TDD had already
exercised as dead weight, and its now-unused PlanPrices import.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The count is taken before ensure() runs, so the sweep reported objects created in
Stripe when it had made none — and after the next interrupted run, that line is
the first thing a human reads. Telling the two apart is the whole point of the
recognition step.
Comparing the price id before and after the call does not distinguish them
either: there is no id before, in either case. AdoptStripePrice counts its own
adoptions instead, which is why it and its product sibling are now singletons —
resolved per call, a counter on the instance would never pass one.
Duplicate products are named in the report as well as the log. We deliberately do
not deactivate them, so only a person can resolve one, and a person reads this.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three real conflicts, and one file that did not conflict and mattered more.
Overview::notices(): both sides added notices. Kept all of them, and pointed
main's mail check at MailboxTransport::NON_DELIVERING — its own comment already
named the constant while the code carried a copy of the list.
billing.blade.php: main wrapped the page in a contract branch. The "payment is
not set up" error moved OUTSIDE it, because the customer most likely to meet
that message is the one buying for the first time, who has no contract yet and
would never have seen it from inside the @else.
ConsoleReportsRealDataTest: kept both sides rather than choosing. The renamed
test and its docblock explain why admin.systems_ok can no longer be asserted on
a bare install; main's mail pin still keeps "clean" clean in the mail
dimension. Picking one would have quietly weakened the other's claim.
HostStepsTest: git combined main's config()->set('provisioning.dns.zone',
'clupilot.com') with this branch's assertion on clupilot.cloud, and produced a
test that contradicted itself with no marker. Main's approach is the better one
— it pins the zone in the test and asserts the SHAPE of the name rather than
this box's domain — so its assertion stands.
HttpStripeClient merged silently and correctly: secret() still throws,
isConfigured() still reads the vault directly. Had it taken main's
filled($this->secret()), six callers that ask in order NOT to get an exception
would have become exception throwers, and the suite would have stayed green.
CheckoutWithoutStripeKeyTest is the lock that would have caught it.
StripeIdempotencyKeyTest (new on main) leaned on the environment fallback for
stripe.secret. That entry is strict now — no fallback in either direction, so
the .env cannot be a back door for a live key in test mode. It stores a real
vault row instead.
1966 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The gap beside the guard. A run that creates a product and dies before storing
its id leaves an orphan exactly as a price does, and past the key's twenty-four
hours the next run makes a second one — after which activePricesFor() is asked
about the wrong product, price recognition goes blind for the whole family, and
every orphaned price on the first product is unreachable.
Two things are unlike the price side, deliberately. No money gate: a product
carries no amount, so its metadata is the whole of the proof. And a duplicate is
reported, never deactivated — archiving a price is provably harmless because
Stripe keeps billing subscriptions already on it, but deactivating a product
makes its prices unsellable and contracts can be running on those.
Silent about strangers, too. This asks for every active product on the account,
so an operator selling something else through it is an ordinary state, not a
finding worth a line on every run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The refusal added in the previous commit had a state it read wrongly, and
the wrong reading was destructive.
record() sat at the END of handle() and in no try/finally, while
createProduct() and ensure() throw uncaught. A run that died after the
first object left hasStoredObjects() true and recorded() null. The same
state arises with no failure at all: CheckoutController → PlanPrices::
ensure() and BookAddon → SyncStripeAddonItems → AddonPrices::ensure()
mint missing prices and never call record().
In that state the next run — in the SAME mode — refused with the foreign
account message and its "Clear plan_families.stripe_product_id,
plan_prices.stripe_price_id and the … registers first", and
billing.catalogue_synced blocked with the same text. The objects were
from the account in force. The right move was to resume, which is what
the idempotency keys exist for; instead an operator was handed a delete
instruction for a catalogue live contracts are billed on.
Two changes:
1. record() moves ahead of the creation loop, right behind the refusal.
There it is already proved that either nothing is stored or what is
stored belongs to the active account, so the moment carries the
claim just as well — and a run that dies part-way can no longer
leave a state that contradicts itself.
2. "Origin never recorded" gets its own sentence and its own cure,
separate from "established: other account".
StripeCatalogueMode::matchesActiveMode() becomes
belongsToAnotherMode(), which is only true where the other account
is fact. The check still blocks — the origin cannot be proved — but
it says "run the sync again", and it names no register to empty.
Red first:
⨯ it takes up a catalogue whose origin was never written down
Failed asserting that 1 matches expected 0.
⨯ it leaves no half-built catalogue that contradicts itself when a run dies
Failed asserting that null is identical to an object of class "App\Support\OperatingMode".
⨯ it tells an unrecorded origin apart from a foreign account
The two states are held apart by assertion, not by wording: only the
foreign-account sentence may name stripe_plan_prices, and the unrecorded
one must name stripe:sync-catalogue instead. The existing foreign-account
test keeps its teeth.
Full suite: 1817 passed, 6366 assertions.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The price half of this question was answered; the product half was left open and
named as a known gap. It is the more consequential one: a second product makes
every activePricesFor() ask about the wrong one, so price recognition goes blind
for that whole family and every orphan on the first product is unreachable.
The whole active list comes back with no metadata filter, because Stripe cannot
search metadata and an account holds a handful of products. Deciding which are
ours belongs to the next commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three ways it did not. It replaced metadata where Stripe merges — and merging is
the property AdoptStripePrice's "write only when it differs" comparison is built
around. It handed metadata back uncast where the wire returns strings, so a test
could pass on an int that production's strict === rejects forever. And a tie on
`created` fell to insertion order, so two runs could adopt different prices.
Paging now throws instead of stopping when Stripe says there is another page and
the last item carries no id. invoiceLines() stops there and it costs a short
document; here it costs an unseen orphan and a second live price for one figure.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The mode switches the credentials. It does not switch what was made from
them: a Price id and a Product id belong to the account that issued them,
and test and live are two accounts. Every credential got two slots on this
branch; the ids derived from them sit in single-valued columns.
So the planned sequence of this installation ended in the exact false
green this page exists to rule out — sync in test, store the live key,
switch, and billing.catalogue_synced went on reporting satisfied because
it only asked whether the column was filled. "Bereit für Livebetrieb",
and the first real order got "No such price".
Detection, not repair. Stripe does not put the account in the id —
prod_… and price_… look the same in both, only KEYS carry _test_/_live_
— so the origin cannot be read back out of a stored id, and asking
Stripe is out: this page reaches nothing over the network on a page load.
What is left is to write it down at sync time, which is what
App\Support\StripeCatalogueMode does.
One setting for the whole catalogue is only honest because
stripe:sync-catalogue now REFUSES a run into a catalogue that belongs to
the other account. Without that, the run would skip every row that already
carries an id, answer "already in step", and record an account it never
touched — the same lie one level down. The registers count as stored
objects too: inStep() takes a registered row as proof on its own for the
reverse-charge half.
The `breaks` sentence says what happens (checkout fails, no order) and
what actually helps, including the awkward half: re-running the sync is
not enough, the pointers and both registers have to be cleared first.
The slot migration backfills the one case it can prove: whatever is at
Stripe was made with the one key this installation has ever stored, so it
belongs to the account that key opens. Otherwise a long-synced catalogue
would read as "origin unknown" and the page would demand a re-sync nobody
needs.
Red first:
⨯ it does not call the catalogue synced when its ids belong to the other account
⨯ it says the sale is refused and a fresh sync is needed, not that a column is empty
⨯ it records the mode its objects were created in
⨯ it refuses to work into a catalogue that belongs to the other account
⨯ it syncs into the new account once the stale ids are cleared
Full suite: 1814 passed, 6357 assertions.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
AdoptStripePrice says in its own docblock that no adoption can move money, and
could compare three properties. The four that also decide what a Price charges
were filtered in HttpStripeClient — where FakeStripeClient cannot express them,
so no test of the class could reach the promise it makes, and a third client
implementation would drop the check in silence.
The client reports them now and the caller decides. Absent keys stay Stripe's
defaults, which is the direction that matters: read the other way round the gate
refuses every legitimate price and recognition becomes a no-op nothing alerts on.
And the unexplained-orphan warning is a state, not an event. It fired on every
sweep and every customer booking for as long as the orphan existed; once a day
per price is enough to act on.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
**The billing address was one textarea**, so what landed in it was
whatever somebody typed: a postcode on the street line, a city with no
postcode, no country at all. It is four fields now — street, postcode,
town, country — in the customer's settings and in the console's customer
editor, which had its own free-text copy of the same field and would have
had an operator's correction silently reverted the next time the customer
saved.
`customers.billing_address` is neither dropped nor parsed: guessing which
line of an existing block is the street would put a postcode where a
street belongs on a document nobody can correct afterwards. It becomes the
COMPOSED form, rewritten from the fields on every save, so IssueInvoice
and everything else that reads it keep working, and a record nobody has
re-saved keeps the block it always had.
**The customer type is fixed once it is on record.** It decides the
fourteen-day right of withdrawal, and a business able to set itself to
"Privatperson" on this page is a business able to withdraw from a contract
it may not withdraw from. Registration asks the question; this page
reports the answer, and saveProfile refuses to answer it a second time —
in the component, not by hiding a radio, because a form that hides a
control has never stopped anybody who can post to /livewire/update. A
record created before the question existed may still be given one, once.
The panel is a fact rather than a form now, which is also what was odd
about it, and the sentence about who has the right of withdrawal is gone.
**Cancelling asks why.** A reason from a fixed list, required, with a note
beside it that "Sonstiges" cannot go without — the one fact worth having
about a departure, asked at the only moment the customer is looking at the
question. It lands on the contract (`cancel_reason`, `cancel_reason_note`).
And where the fourteen days are still running, the dialogue offers the
WITHDRAWAL as a way out of itself rather than as one more reason inside
it: withdrawing ends the service the same day and sends the whole amount
back, cancelling keeps the term that was paid for, and somebody entitled
to the first should not lose it by taking the second unasked. A business
is never offered it — WithdrawalRight answers that, not the template.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2321854 removed it. That commit's own work — discarding an unconfirmed
registration and sweeping abandoned ones — is untouched and correct; what went
with it was every file of the Stripe price adoption merged an hour earlier:
AdoptStripePrice, IdempotencyKey, the unique-index migration, both test files,
the spec, the plan, and the edits in six more.
Nothing was lost. The commits stayed in history and the files stayed on disk,
untracked, which is what a staged deletion from a stale tree leaves behind.
Restored from 4eb90c8, the reviewed head, by explicit path — the fourteen paths
2321854 damaged and not one more, so the ten files that commit legitimately
added or changed keep exactly what it gave them.
This is the failure the repo's own rule exists to prevent: stage by path, never
`git add -A`, because a second session's index does not know what a first one
merged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
It was one column 768 pixels wide inside a 1240-pixel shell — a third of
the window empty beside it — holding everything a customer might ever
change: the company address, their password, two-factor, the devices they
are signed in on, the branding of their cloud, the contract, and the
button that closes the account. Two thousand pixels of scroll, and the way
to a particular thing was knowing how far down it lived.
Four tabs, by what somebody came to do: their details, security, the
appearance of their cloud, the contract. The same tab bar the console
uses, so one vocabulary holds on both sides of the login, and the choice
lives in the query string — `#[Url(history: true)]`, no `except`, so the
parameter is there from the first render and a link to this page can name
the part it means. An unknown tab out of the address falls back to the
first rather than rendering a settings page with no section on it.
The width is used now. Inside a tab the short cards sit side by side
instead of each taking a full row to hold three lines: the customer type
beside the company form (it is one question, and beside the VAT field it
was mistaken for it), the password beside two-factor, the logo beside the
colours, the contract beside the closing of the account.
Also: the subtitle listed the old sections by name.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
**Every package button led to "Dieses Paket steht nicht (mehr) zum
Verkauf".** The link was built as route() plus "?term=" + term — but both
are QUERY parameters on this route, so route() had already opened the
query string and the result was `?plan=team?term=monthly`. The package
arrived as the whole string "team?term=monthly", matched nothing in the
catalogue, and the page said so politely while giving no hint why. The
address now comes from route() in one piece with a placeholder swapped
into it, and a test asserts every checkout link on the page contains
exactly one question mark.
**The saving moved the buttons it belonged to.** It hung under the switch
and was hidden on the yearly view, so choosing a term shifted the very
control that chooses it. It sits above now and never disappears: one line,
two wordings — an offer while it is an offer, a statement once it is
taken. Same on the public sheet, where its vanishing re-centred the row.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
**There was no checkout page.** The package list posted straight to
Stripe, so the last thing a customer saw in this product's design was a
grid of cards and the next was somebody else's form asking for a card
number. What they were buying, what it costs in total, what happens
afterwards and what they were agreeing to were never stated in one place.
App\Livewire\Checkout is that place: the package and its figures on the
left, a sticky summary on the right — net, the saving where there is one,
the setup fee, the tax, what is due today, and what will be charged after
it. Every figure comes from the catalogue, TaxTreatment and SetupFee, the
same three the checkout itself reads; nothing is recomputed, because a
summary that works out its own total is a second answer waiting to
disagree with the one Stripe is handed.
**The terms acceptance moved to where the money is spent.** It sat at the
top of the package list as a condition of LOOKING at prices, with every
button dead beneath it. It is a condition of buying, so it is now at the
foot of the summary, directly above the button — after the total, which is
the order those three things are read in. The package list has no form on
it at all now; its buttons are links.
**The page used the left half of a 1240px shell.** A 68-character title, a
switch under it and an 80-character footnote, beside a grid that used the
whole width. Now: a header band with the name left and the term switch
right, where a control belongs, and a closing band of three columns
instead of a paragraph trailing off.
**The yearly view showed the monthly equivalent as its headline**, so on a
package with no free months the big figure did not move at all when the
switch was thrown — the page looked like it had ignored the click. The
headline is the price of the term in the unit it is charged in; what a
year works out to per month is said underneath. Same on the public sheet.
**The switch was unreadable.** `text-on-ink` is not in this palette — the
ink pairing is bg-ink/text-bg, as x-ui.button has always had it — so the
label kept its inherited grey on a near-black pill. And its shell was
rounded-lg with rounded-md options inside: two radius scales, one of them
Tailwind's untokenised 6px. One scale now, nested.
**The mails drew an empty orange tile.** The mark's ascent lives in an SVG
the site loads and a mail cannot — Gmail strips inline SVG, Outlook renders
with Word, and this layout carries no image by design. The shape is drawn
with a character every mail font has, white on the accent tile, with the
whole wordmark beside it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Both prices have existed since the catalogue did — one `plan_prices` row
per term, each with its own Stripe Price, and the checkout has taken a
`term` all along. Nothing ever sent one. The shop showed the monthly
figure, the order page posted no term, and the yearly Price sat there
being paid for by nobody.
**The console asks for free months, not a second price.** It used to take
the yearly TOTAL as its own free-form figure, so nothing in the system
knew WHY 588 belonged to a package costing 49 a month — and no page could
say "zwei Monate gratis" without a person working it out again and writing
it somewhere it would then drift. Now: the monthly price and how many of
the twelve months are free. The total is derived from the two
(PlanVersions::yearlyCents), previewed live on the form, and written to
the catalogue from the same arithmetic.
`free_months` sits on the VERSION, beside the capabilities publication
freezes, because that is what it is — part of the terms a customer bought.
The migration reads it back out of the prices that already exist rather
than defaulting to nought: an installation selling twelve-for-ten must not
lose that on a deploy. Only an exact division counts; a hand-negotiated
yearly figure keeps its amount and simply goes unexplained.
**The customer chooses.** A switch on the order page and on the public
sheet, both figures rendered and one shown, so switching costs no request.
The headline stays "per month" in either term — a yearly total as one big
number reads as five times dearer at a glance — with the amount actually
taken, the net figure, the months free and what twelve monthly payments
would have cost underneath. The form posts the term the customer was
looking at, and the checkout picks that term's Stripe Price.
The billing card now says which term is running. It states a monthly
figure whatever the term, so a yearly customer was reading a number that
never appears on a statement.
Also: **a Blade comment must never spell a directive.** Blade compiles
what is inside `{{-- --}}` too — the comment is stripped from the output,
but its directives are compiled on the way there. A comment explaining why
the parenthesised php directive had been avoided produced exactly the open
PHP tag it warned about, and the rest of the file was swallowed as PHP
source: no exception, no warning, the page one block short. That is how
the term switch vanished after being written. BladeCommentsTest scans for
the forms that open a tag.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
**The test mail was rejected: "553 5.7.1 Sender address rejected: not
owned by user no-reply@…".** Every purpose mailbox here has its own SMTP
account, and a mail server lets an account send only from the address it
owns. Mail::to() hands back a pending mail bound to the DEFAULT mailer and
sendNow() then ignores the mailer the mailable asked for, so a mail
addressed support@ went out over the no-reply@ login. It sends through the
mailable's own mailer now, and the cloud-ready preview — the one mailable
with no mailbox at all — takes the provisioning mailbox like the real
notification does.
Writing the test for that found the same bug in production code:
**InvoiceMail and OrderConfirmationMail set their From to billing@ and
never named a mailer**, so both went out over mail.default's no-reply@
login. On this installation no customer had ever received an invoice mail
or an order confirmation; they rendered perfectly, queued without
complaint and were refused at the door. MailSenderOwnershipTest now scans
for the mismatch: a mail that takes a mailbox From must use that
mailbox's mailer.
**The box on the order page accepts the terms now**, not an immediate
start. It used to carry the whole FAGG §16 sentence, which read like a
choice between "now" and "in fourteen days" — and there is no second
option. The terms are what regulate the sale, so they had to exist:
resources/views/legal/terms.blade.php replaces the placeholder with
fourteen sections written from what this software actually does — the
delivery, the capacity queue, the full refund on withdrawal, the
cancellation at period end, the deletion deadlines. The company data
comes from CompanyProfile, so the page and the invoices cannot drift. No
availability figure and no liability cap has been invented.
No order goes through without it: the button is unusable until the box is
ticked and says why, and CheckoutController still refuses server-side —
the browser half refuses nothing. The request field is `terms_accepted`;
the Stripe metadata key stays `immediate_start`, because a session opened
before a deploy is paid after it and the webhook would find nothing under
a new name.
**"Wird der Account nach fünf Tagen gelöscht?"** Only an unconfirmed one.
That was the whole of what we said, so the answer looked like yes. The
second rule now exists and is stated: PruneDormantAccounts removes a
confirmed account after a year when it never had a package — no customer
record at all, which is where every order, contract and seven-year invoice
hangs. A fortnight's notice goes out first, once, and `dormant_warned_at`
is what permits the deletion: an account whose warning never went out is
never removed. Signing in resets the clock, measured off the device rows
because users has no last_login_at.
Both deadlines are said in the portal settings, on the verification page,
and in the terms — each reading the number off the command that enforces
it.
Also: the wordmark scan matched any element whose text merely BEGINS with
the company name, which a paragraph of terms does. It looks for the lockup
form now (no whitespace after the tag), which is what it was always about.
The seven checkout tests in the parallel session's files were posting the
old field name and now post the new one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
"Abmelden und neu registrieren" was advice that could not work. Signing out
frees nothing: the address is still held by the unique index, so registering
again with the address somebody meant fails — and every abandoned attempt
stayed in `users` for ever. Reported exactly that way, and it was right.
The button discards the account instead. Only an UNCONFIRMED one, and only
one with nothing behind it: the webhook creates a customer's login from a
paid checkout, so a user can sit on this page unconfirmed while already
having a contract, and deleting that is data loss dressed up as a
convenience. It refuses and says where to go. A confirmed account is closed,
not discarded — that is ConfirmCloseAccount, with an invoice history behind
it.
R23: confirmed in a modal. The modal mutates nothing; it dispatches the event
the page listens for, so the checks stay in the one place they already are
rather than being duplicated where they could drift.
And nothing has to be discarded by hand. clupilot:prune-unverified removes
registrations nobody confirmed after five days — long enough for somebody who
signed up on a Friday and found the mail in a spam folder on Monday, short
enough that a typo does not hold the correct address for a month. It skips a
confirmed account whatever its age, and any account with a customer record
behind it, matched on user_id AND on the address, because either link means
somebody is a customer. Every removal is logged with the address: a line that
disappears is what somebody asks about later, and a count answers nothing.
The deadline is said on the page as well as in the mail. Somebody who never
received the mail is looking at the page, and the deadline is the reason they
do not have to do anything about an attempt they abandon.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The money gate compared amount, currency and interval and left the rest to a
filter that excluded two fields. A recurring, licensed, monthly price with
transform_quantity divide_by 10, at our exact figure, on our product, carrying
our addon key passed all five conditions. Modules bill BY quantity — a pack is
one item at quantity n — so a customer holding three would have been charged
one. A tiered price was excluded only by accident: Stripe reports unit_amount
null for it and we read that as 0, which fails the amount match unless the
caller's own figure is 0, and PlanPrices::ensure() has no zero guard.
activePricesFor() now also skips a non-empty transform_quantity and any
billing_scheme other than per_unit. Absent keys stay Stripe's defaults, which
is the direction that matters: read the other way round the filter would refuse
every legitimate price and turn recognition into a permanent no-op. The
contract docblock names the four properties instead of claiming to cover all of
them, and says the list is not everything Stripe can put on a price — only
what is known to change what one charges.
And a comment that says a gap is covered is worse than the gap. The sync said a
crash between Stripe creating a product and us storing its id gives back the
same product next run: true for twenty-four hours, false afterwards, and the
exact claim this branch was written to refute. There is no recognition step for
products at all, so an interrupted run leaves an orphan and the next run past
the expiry mints a second one — worse than a duplicate price, because
activePricesFor() then looks at the wrong product and recognition goes blind
for the whole family. Written down as a known gap at both createProduct call
sites, with the trade this branch chose: folding name and metadata into the key
means a renamed family now mints a second product where it used to answer 400,
and a blockade reaches a paying customer while a duplicate product does not.
The sweep no longer reports "created" for what it adopted — the count is taken
before ensure() runs, and telling those two apart is the whole point.
The test named after 2026-07-29 could not reproduce it: the fake's key ledger
was empty, so createPrice() could not have thrown and the test could not tell
"adoption prevented the 400" from "no 400 was possible". Seeded now with the
key today's call sends and a fingerprint over the metadata the pre-9da1358 call
sent. Remove the adopt() call from AddonPrices::ensure() and the test dies with
Stripe's own sentence instead of an assertion.
Also: the plan document still instructed migrate:fresh --env=testing. There is
no .env.testing here, so it targets the live development database; struck
through with the reason, not deleted, and a Korrekturen section records the
five defects the plan's own reviews found in it. Four comments corrected —
"below" that meant above, a counter claimed unable to tie that ties with a
planted price, the unique index's second meaning for remember()'s catch, and
that MariaDB DDL is not transactional so the dedupe commits before the index.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The migration's own docblock justified an irreversible delete with a mechanism
that cannot fire: after the dedupe the deleted row's Price id is always still
claimed, by the survivor, so AdoptStripePrice's `claimed` callback always skips
it. The rebuild is real, but it goes through a fresh createPrice() under the
deleted row's own tuple-specific idempotency key, not through adoption. A
comment whose whole job is to justify deleting production rows has to name the
mechanism that runs, not the one that structurally cannot — this is the fourth
false justification this branch has carried, and the incident the whole
feature exists for started the same way.
The delete itself left no trace: down() restores the index, not the rows, and
two rows on one Price necessarily have different tuples, so at most one can
match what the Price actually charges — after the one real run there would be
nothing to check the survivor against. Added a Log::warning per duplicate
group naming the shared Price, the row kept, and every row thrown away.
Test: read back stripe_price_id and amount_cents on the surviving and
unrelated rows instead of only checking they still exist, closing the "kept
the right row but damaged it" gap. Added a second duplicate group of three
rows sharing one Price so the migration's foreach runs more than once and a
single iteration deletes more than one row. Re-verified the "lowest id
survives" assertion is load-bearing by flipping min('id') to max('id') during
this fix and confirming the test fails there, then reverting.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026_07_31_210000_one_row_per_stripe_price deletes rows from a live table —
the one place in this branch where a mistake loses data, not merely a place
where "read the migration" is enough. Nothing exercised that branch: every
other test in this file starts from an empty, already-migrated table, so the
delete never had anything to find.
RefreshDatabase has already run the migration by the time any test starts, so
its own unique index refuses the very duplicate this needs to insert. The new
test drops the index first, puts two rows on one Price back the way a
pre-migration table actually looked, and re-runs up() (require, not
require_once, the way the other migration-replay tests in this suite already
do) to reach the branch directly.
It asserts the row with the LOWER id survives, not merely that a row survives:
that ordering is a decision made on the operator's behalf, and it is the row
anything already billing is likeliest to have been reading. Checked by
temporarily inverting min('id') to max('id') during this work — the test
failed exactly there, then passed again once reverted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The plan register has had this since 2026_07_30_110000. The module register
never did, so two rows could claim one Price and archiving the one would have
withdrawn the Price the other was still selling — Block D of the real-run
handoff.
It is also the net under the adoption step: at a VAT rate of nought both
treatments charge the same amount, and the check that refuses an already-claimed
Price is then the only thing keeping the two apart.
Duplicates are deleted, not archived. An archived row goes on claiming the id
and a unique index knows nothing about archived_at; the row rebuilds itself on
the next ensure(), and subscription_addons holds the Stripe id as text rather
than a foreign key, so no booking loses its price.
AddonPrices::remember()'s catch comment described the guard as the only thing
standing between two rows and one Price; now that the index exists, rewritten
to describe it as the net under that guard instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two things the plan's own text asked back. First, the idempotency-key
comment lost its substance when Task 5 rewrote it: the charged amount and
the treatment are in the key because at a rate of nought the two Prices
are the same amount and one key would have Stripe hand back a single
object for both — a maintainer who simplified that key would only
rediscover why from a unique-constraint violation. Restored alongside the
newer sentence about what actually stops a second Price (adoption, not
this key), so the module and plan sides read alike again. Spelled out
"twenty-four hours" in both places in the same comment, matching the
sibling.
Second, nothing pinned identifying: ['plan_price_id'] — the one decision
that makes the plan side different from the module side, because a
family's Product carries a Price for every version, term and treatment,
so plan_family alone cannot say which row a Price belongs to. Added a
test that plants a Price proving only the family, confirmed it fails
when identifying is loosened to ['plan_family'], and reverted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Both new tests passed whether adoption ran or not: Stripe forgets an
idempotency key after twenty-four hours, and that expiry is the only
condition under which the 2026-07-29 duplicate was ever minted. With the
sync's own key still in the fake's ledger, createPrice() replayed the
right answer on its own, so testing the recognition step with the key
still in force tested nothing.
Clearing $this->stripe->keys before the second call is what lets
createPrice() actually mint, which is what gives both tests something to
fail on. The second test needed one more thing: this row's own domestic
Price is a legitimate orphan the moment its register row is gone, so it
had to be archived first — otherwise adoption would rightly reclaim it
before ever weighing the wrong-owner Price, and the refusal this test
exists to prove would never be reached.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Same defect, same fix, one difference: a family Product carries every version
and every term, so the amount alone does not say which row a Price belongs to.
plan_price_id in the metadata does, and it is what has to agree before a Price
is taken over.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The comment from the last commit had it backwards. It called the two
original assertions "not the guard" and claimed the three DB-state
assertions fail when adoption reaches the wrong figure — both false.
AdoptStripePrice performs no database writes at all, so nothing it does can
fail an assertion that reads the 2900-net row's own table state, singly or
in combination. The `archived` assertion — the only one that reads what
Stripe was actually told — is the one adoption can fail, by archiving the
frozen booking's own Price as a false duplicate of the new figure's orphan.
Left as a trusted comment, this would have read as an invitation to delete
the real guard as redundant scaffolding around the "real" three. Reworded to
say what the DB-state assertions actually defend instead — archiveSuperseded()
losing its net_cents scoping, or remember() rewritten as an updateOrCreate()
keyed without amount_cents — and to name where each of adoption's two guards
(the amount match, the claimed callback) is tested in isolation elsewhere in
this file, since neither is isolated here.
Also closed the `archived_at` assertion: it read null for a row that is
still live and for one that is gone or rewritten onto the wrong net_cents
alike. An `exists()` check now stands beside it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Task 5: Billing::purchase() now checks SecretVault for a stripe.secret before
touching anything else — no customer, no plan lookup, no Order row — and the
customer reads a plain sentence instead of a 500 page. HttpStripeClient's own
secret() throws the same StripeNotConfigured exception rather than sending a
request with an empty bearer token and letting Stripe's 401 stand in for the
real cause.
isConfigured() was fixed alongside it: it used to call secret() too, which
would have turned every "is Stripe set up?" check (the checkout controller,
the catalogue sync commands) into an uncaught exception the moment a key went
missing — the opposite of what this task is for. It now reads the vault
directly.
The new guard is unconditional, including for the cart-only purchase types
(storage, addon, plan changes) that never call Stripe themselves — a cart
order nobody can ever pay for is pointless to create. That broke every
existing Billing/Cart/Downgrade test that calls purchase() without a stored
key; each affected fixture now deposits one via the new withStripeSecret()
Pest helper. A few of those tests (CustomDomainAccessTest, DowngradeTest) were
passing already but for the wrong reason — the new guard, not the check they
were named for — since both only assert an order was NOT created; they get
the same fixture fix so they still prove what they claim.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two Important findings from review, both against the plan's own text.
The frozen-booking test could not fail for a defect this diff introduces.
Digging into why turned up two problems, not one. The two assertions the
review named were never exercised: sync-catalogue never writes
subscription_addons.stripe_price_id, and the orphan planted for the new
figure sits at a different amount than the booking's own price, so
archiveSuperseded's net_cents scoping was never going to reach it either.
Underneath that, the test's own orphan was inert regardless of any of that:
with no StripeAddonPrice row seeded first, AddonPrices::product() minted its
own Stripe Product instead of reusing 'prod_support', so the competing
orphan planted under that literal id sat on a product nothing ever asked
about. Fixed both — seeded the product the way the first two tests in this
file already do, added the three assertions the review specified, and a
comment on what the two original assertions do and do not prove.
Verified the fix actually bites, since a test whose teeth are asserted but
never demonstrated is what produced this finding in the first place. With
just the amount check in AdoptStripePrice disabled, the booking still
survived: the `claimed` callback this diff wires into AddonPrices::ensure()
caught it as a second, independent guard. Only disabling both together
reproduced the failure — the honest demonstration, not the single-line
sabotage first suggested, which this diff's own defense-in-depth absorbs.
The remember() comment credited a unique index stripe_addon_prices does not
have — that index sits on stripe_plan_prices, the plan side. Reworded to
name what actually keeps two rows off one Price id today (the `claimed`
callback), what 2026_07_31_210000_one_row_per_stripe_price adds as a net
under it, and why two rows sharing one Price is dangerous: archiving one —
the ordinary response to a superseded figure — would withdraw the very
Price the other row is still selling.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The sweep that died on 2026-07-29 left price_1TygdEC7u8NpJ8pOt3nsoyYw at Stripe
and no row here. This is the step that finds it: same money, same interval, our
metadata on it, unclaimed — taken over and brought up to date instead of
duplicated.
The comment on the key was the root of it. It read "keyed on what the Price IS",
and a key is not that: identity is product, amount, currency and interval, and
recognising those is AdoptStripePrice's job. Stripe forgets a key after a day;
it never was the guard against a duplicate.
A booking stays where it was sold. Adoption only ever matches an identical
amount, so a frozen booking cannot be moved by it — there is a test that says so.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
activePricesFor() reported interval alone, never interval_count or usage_type.
A Price we could not have created ourselves — billed every three months, or on
metered usage — could carry our own metadata (Stripe's dashboard "duplicate
price" copies it) and pass AdoptStripePrice's amount/currency/interval check on
'month' alone. Adopting it would move money onto a different recurrence, which
is exactly what nothing here may do.
Filtered at the boundary instead of in the predicate: HttpStripeClient now
skips anything besides Stripe's own defaults (interval_count 1, usage_type
licensed), so activePricesFor() can promise callers it returns only prices we
could have minted. FakeStripeClient needed no filter — it only ever holds
prices its own createPrice()/plantPrice() made, all standard — but says so, so
the omission doesn't read as forgotten.
Two more silent-failure paths, closed with the same three lines each:
- The metadata-differs check was a bare !==, which is key-order sensitive and
blind to Stripe's own merge. A Price carrying an extra key of its own, or
metadata handed back in a different order, could never compare equal and
would be rewritten every sweep forever. Compared through
array_intersect_key() plus ksort() on both sides instead, so only what WE
would send is what gets compared.
- Metadata is normalised to strings once, up front, so an un-cast value from a
caller can't make confirms() fail forever and silently turn adoption off for
that Price.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An abandoned run leaves an orphan: Stripe made the Price, our insert never
happened, and the table that decides everything afterwards does not know it
exists. The key covers a day; after that the next run makes a second live Price
for the same money.
What may be taken over is narrow. Same amount, currency and interval — a Price
at another figure would move money, and nothing here may: a running contract
keeps the Price it was sold on, and a booking stays frozen at what it cost that
day. Plus proof in the metadata, because an unexplained active Price at the
right money is what somebody clicking through Stripe's dashboard leaves behind,
and adopting that is worse than minting a second one.
Several orphans: the oldest is adopted — likeliest to be the one a lost row was
billing on — and the rest are archived, which stops them being sold and moves
nobody.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Nothing here could. The client could create, archive and unarchive a Price and
had no way to list one, so a run that died between Stripe's create and our
insert left an orphan our table never learned about — and once the key expired,
the next run made a second live Price for the same money.
Paged to the end like invoiceLines(), because a family Product collects a Price
per version, term, treatment and rate change, and stopping at the first page
would leave the orphan unfound and mint the duplicate anyway.
updatePriceMetadata() alongside it: metadata is one of the few fields a Price
lets you change, which is why the metadata format is not part of a Price's
identity and why an adopted orphan is brought up to date rather than replaced.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A key says "I already sent this call", not "this is what the object is". The
catalogue calls sent metadata that the key knew nothing about, so adding the
tax_treatment field in 9da1358 poisoned yesterday's key for a day — and
AddonPrices::ensure() runs inside a customer's module booking, not only in the
sweep.
createPrice and createProduct now fold a fingerprint of their parameters into
the key. refund, cancelSubscription, addSubscriptionItem and the checkout
deliberately do not: there a second object is the customer's money taken twice,
and Stripe's refusal is the thing worth keeping.
The fake could not see any of this. Its ledger replayed the first id for a
repeated key without ever comparing what the second call asked for.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A verified EU business outside Austria gets reverse charge — rate 0, no VAT
line, the note on the invoice — and was still charged 214,80 € for a 179,00 €
package, because one Stripe Price carried the domestic gross for everybody.
There is no VAT line on their document to reclaim, so it was a flat 20 %
surcharge on exactly the customers who read their invoices, and the document
then stated the whole 214,80 € as net at 0 %, so they self-accounted their own
VAT on a base a fifth too large.
A Stripe Price can ask who is buying after all: there are two per sellable
thing now, the domestic gross and the bare net, both live on one Product, and
the checkout picks by TaxTreatment. The rule is Austria B2B 20 %, other EU B2B
without VAT — a domestic business still pays the gross, reclaims it as input
tax, and the price on the website is still the price charged for them.
- stripe:sync-catalogue mints and archives both halves of every pair, per plan
and per module; `reverse_charge` on stripe_plan_prices/stripe_addon_prices
says which is which, and joining it on subscriptions.stripe_price_id says
which one a running contract is billed on. A rate change moves the gross
Price and leaves the net one alone, because the net owes nothing to the rate.
- A status that changes after the sale converges: a verification (or a lapse)
makes stripe:reprice-subscriptions move the contract onto the other Price
with PRORATE_NONE, because the term is already paid for. The module items
follow the same way.
- Downstream follows: the invoice total equals what was taken, the proof
register expects the figure this customer is actually charged (so a correct
reverse-charge sale is no longer flagged as a mismatch, and an overcharged
one is), the setup fee obeys the same rule, and the booking page quotes what
it will charge.
- StripeClient gained activatePrice(). Archived Prices were brought back in our
own table and left inactive at Stripe, so a rate that moved and moved back
pointed the catalogue at a Price no checkout could be opened for.
An unverified number is still charged the gross — an unchecked string must
never be a discount — and where the net Price is missing the checkout refuses
rather than reaching for the domestic one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The capacity park could not survive its own first poll. ReserveResources
polls every 120 s and declared a maxDuration of 60, and RunRunner measures
a step's budget from a started_at it deliberately does not reset on a poll
— so every re-entry was ruled timed out before the body ran, a timeout
consumes an attempt, and five of them failed a paid order in about six
minutes. The fourteen-day promise, the console's capacity queue and the
"go and buy a server" workflow were unreachable code. maxDuration is now
the whole park plus one poll interval, and a test drives a park through
the runner rather than calling execute() directly, which is why this was
invisible.
Every guest occ call ran as root. `docker compose exec` defaults to root
and the Nextcloud image's console.php exits 1 unless the caller owns
config/config.php, so all five call sites were failing on every instance.
There is now one builder, App\Support\NextcloudOcc, and a test refuses a
second: nothing in app/ may spell the invocation out by hand. deploy/
update.sh had learned this for our own container and nobody carried it
across.
RunAcceptanceChecks was terminal on the first no. certReachable() answers
false for a connect timeout as readily as for a missing certificate, so
one bad second ended a finished, certified Nextcloud as a failed order
with the instance released. The probes retry now and the run still fails
for good with the probe's own reason once the budget is spent; the two
facts a retry cannot change stay terminal.
The in-flight guard asked whether anything was running, not whether it
would do the work. App\Provisioning\WorkInFlight asks the second question,
reading the step lists the runner executes: a domain proven during a
restart is routed, and a storage pack booked during an address run is
delivered instead of charged monthly and forgotten.
The address pipeline ran its steps in the wrong order for the direction it
exists for. Nextcloud before the router in `address` and `plan-change`, as
in `customer`, because a run that got the certificate and then failed left
the customer's own domain serving an untrusted-domain error under a valid
certificate while the portal called it live. Safe in both directions; the
reasoning is written above the pipeline.
A stale guest_ip could never be corrected. ConfigureDnsAndTls compared the
hostnames but never the backend, and nothing re-read the address after the
build. It now records and compares `routed_backend`, and ConfigureNetwork
joins the `restart` pipeline — a cold boot is what moves a DHCP lease — and
asks for the address to be re-applied when the guest has actually moved.
Also: HetznerDnsClient::upsertRecord read only the first page of a zone
that pages at 100, so past a hundred records it created a second A record
for the same name and the cloud was up about half the time; the console's
retry left a live customer's order in `provisioning` for ever for any
maintenance pipeline; and a revived run's first pass burned an attempt on a
timeout that had already happened, because the clause written for it used
`??=`.
Seven test sites wrote config('provisioning.plans.*'), a key that has not
existed since the catalogue moved into the database. Every write was a
no-op, so each test proved something other than its name: the missing
template, the two snapshot regressions and the grandfathered-price scenario
are now actually constructed, ValidateOrder's reasons are asserted rather
than only its type, and the end-to-end run checks that the quota step
delivered something.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Five places where the product told somebody a figure that nothing behind
it produced.
**The invoice page showed five invoices nobody was ever issued.** A mock
that outlived its purpose: CP-2026-0003 to CP-2026-0007, a prefix
belonging to no configured series, all "paid", a spend curve from 179 to
198 € and a next charge of 198 € on 01.08.2026 — behind
['auth','verified','customer.active'], so every signed-in customer saw
it. Their real invoices existed in `invoices`, were rendered as PDFs and
mailed to them, and appeared nowhere in the portal at all. The page now
lists their own documents, newest first, with the numbers, dates and
totals off the frozen snapshot, a Storno marked as one, and a download.
The PDF route resolves the document against the signed-in customer in
the query — a URL anybody can type is not made private by not printing
it. No next charge and no chart: nothing here computes what Stripe will
take next cycle, and a figure nobody has worked out is worse than a
blank space.
**The setup fee was quoted everywhere and charged nowhere.** On the
price sheet, on the booking page, set by the operator in the console —
and CompanyProfile::setupFeeCents() had no reader outside the two
sentences that quoted it. It is charged now, as a second non-recurring
line on the same checkout session, which Stripe puts on the initial
invoice only. `orders.setup_fee_cents` records how much of the charge it
was, so the whole total still goes back on a withdrawal while the
register holds the PACKAGE's charge against the contract price and the
invoice prints the fee as a line of its own. The booking page was also
quoting the fee NET under the same sentence the website quotes GROSS —
99,00 against 118,80 — and now quotes what will be taken.
**An upgrade click cancelled a booked downgrade and delivered nothing.**
Nothing in this application marks a cart order paid, so the customer
traded a downgrade they had genuinely booked for a cart line that would
never be fulfilled. The booking now stands until the upgrade actually
lands on the contract, where ApplyPlanChange clears it. The fulfilment
seam is reachable for every type that can be paid — a module and a
storage pack book through BookAddon, which was the missing path from a
paid order to a SubscriptionAddon and left AddonPrices,
SyncStripeAddonItems and clupilot:end-cancelled-addons with no caller
behind a payment. A paid traffic pack logs an error rather than pretending:
the metered allowance is a standing count of packs while a top-up is sold
for one month, and which of the two is meant is not a guess to make here.
That no path to `paid` exists yet is now stated in both places rather
than in one.
**The proof register called correct charges wrong.** expected_gross_cents
used the CUSTOMER's rate, which is zero under reverse charge, against
the domestic gross Stripe actually took — so matches_catalogue was false
for every EU business sale charged exactly the advertised amount, and
for every renewal on a contract with a module, which was held against
`price_cents` alone. It compares against TaxTreatment::chargedCents()
and against the whole term now. Where no money moved, charged and the
flag are null instead of the expected figure agreeing with itself, and a
plan change records the terms with the pro-rata figures in the snapshot
rather than money that arrives again on Stripe's proration invoice.
**The seller's own VAT id was on the invoice, unlabelled**, between the
register number and the court. Labelled — and the footer's composition
moved out of the TCPDF method, because inside one the only way to read
what it says is to render a PDF and un-subset its fonts.
One test enshrined a figure the code does not produce: a reverse-charge
purchase recorded with no charged amount, asserting 17900/0/17900, where
OpenSubscription always passes the charged figure and a real one records
21480/0/21480. Another asserted that an upgrade click cancels a booked
downgrade.
Full suite: 1676 passed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
nexxo