The count is taken before ensure() runs, so the sweep reported objects created in
Stripe when it had made none — and after the next interrupted run, that line is
the first thing a human reads. Telling the two apart is the whole point of the
recognition step.
Comparing the price id before and after the call does not distinguish them
either: there is no id before, in either case. AdoptStripePrice counts its own
adoptions instead, which is why it and its product sibling are now singletons —
resolved per call, a counter on the instance would never pass one.
Duplicate products are named in the report as well as the log. We deliberately do
not deactivate them, so only a person can resolve one, and a person reads this.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The gap beside the guard. A run that creates a product and dies before storing
its id leaves an orphan exactly as a price does, and past the key's twenty-four
hours the next run makes a second one — after which activePricesFor() is asked
about the wrong product, price recognition goes blind for the whole family, and
every orphaned price on the first product is unreachable.
Two things are unlike the price side, deliberately. No money gate: a product
carries no amount, so its metadata is the whole of the proof. And a duplicate is
reported, never deactivated — archiving a price is provably harmless because
Stripe keeps billing subscriptions already on it, but deactivating a product
makes its prices unsellable and contracts can be running on those.
Silent about strangers, too. This asks for every active product on the account,
so an operator selling something else through it is an ordinary state, not a
finding worth a line on every run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
nexxo