5 Commits (ecfced9257f573e08274b59aa033513134a123a9)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
nexxo	98afd1d7e0	Re-apply what the last release commit silently reverted ... The English paths and the zone migration went out in 5f74a5f and were gone again in the tag. Reported for the fourth time, and the fourth report was right: nothing had changed on the server. What happened is mine and worth writing down. I have been building commits in a private index (GIT_INDEX_FILE) to avoid staging a parallel session's in-flight work, and moving the branch with `git update-ref`. That moves HEAD without touching the shared index — so the index still described the PREVIOUS commit. The very next ordinary `git commit` (the version bump) wrote that stale index as a tree, which reverted every file of the commit before it. The tag was cut from the revert. Two things follow. The private-index technique is only safe while the branch is not checked out; once it is, `git branch -f` refuses for exactly this reason and `update-ref` is the same operation with the safety removed. And a release is not verified by a green push — it is verified by reading the tag, which is what finally found this. Content unchanged from 5f74a5f: English fragments and legal paths with permanent redirects, the guarded zone migration, and the test that walks every route and fragment so a German path fails the suite instead of being reported again. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 17:36:43 +02:00
nexxo	1620cb9395	Release 1.3.22 ... v1.3.21 was taken by a parallel release between reading main and writing the commit; the version file went out saying 1.3.21 on a commit that is not that tag. Corrected here rather than by rewriting a pushed commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 17:26:46 +02:00
nexxo	5f74a5f370	Move the zone by migration, and put every path in English ... ── The zone, for the fourth time ──────────────────────────────────────────── "Change it in the console" was the wrong answer three times running. An installation with nothing to migrate should simply arrive on the new zone, so a migration does it — guarded by exactly the condition clupilot:check-zone reports on: no instance in service, therefore nothing carrying the old name in DNS, in a certificate or in trusted_domains. With even one instance it does nothing and logs why, because re-addressing a running Nextcloud is a migration with an outage and a migration is not the place to start one. It leaves an installation already on another zone alone: the setting exists so somebody else can run this on their own domain. That fixes both reports at once — the security page and the price sheet read the same setting, which is the entire reason neither of them has the domain typed into it. ── R13, applied to all of them this time ──────────────────────────────────── "Ich schreibe das nun zum dritten Mal" — fair. The rule was cited, I changed the one route that had been pointed at, and left every other German path standing. A fragment is part of a URL too. #produkt → #product /legal/impressum → /legal/imprint #ablauf → #process /legal/datenschutz → /legal/privacy #preise → #pricing /legal/agb → /legal/terms #fragen → #faq (old paths redirect, permanently — they have been #kontakt → #contact in the footer and in mail for weeks) The headings stay German. "Impressum" is the legal term an Austrian company has to use; the address is not part of the copy. A test now walks every registered route and every fragment the site links to, so the next German path fails the suite instead of being reported a fourth time. Three existing tests set config('provisioning.dns.zone') and read it back through the accessor. That worked while the setting was empty and stopped the moment the migration filled it — they set the setting now, and the one whose premise is "nothing saved yet" establishes that premise itself. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 17:26:20 +02:00
nexxo	3a4324fb6f	Give people a way back in, and put the URL in English ... ── The hole ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── There was no password reset. Fortify's feature was commented out, so there was no link on the sign-in form, no page and no route — a customer who forgot their password was locked out of their own cloud until somebody opened a shell. On a product whose selling point is that you can ring somebody, that is a support call a week and an embarrassing one. Two pages of ours under Fortify's route names (R1/R2), because with views off Fortify registers only the POST endpoints. The mail is a Mailable in this product's design rather than the framework's MailMessage: somebody who has just been locked out is exactly the person a phishing mail is aimed at, and a message that looks nothing like the rest of our post is one they cannot check — ours carries the footer that names our domains. Three decisions worth stating, each with a test: The answer is identical whether the address is known or not. "No account with that address" turns the form into a way of finding out who is a customer. The reset kills every other session. Whoever knew the old password may still be signed in somewhere, and a reset that leaves them there has fixed nothing. It does NOT sign the visitor in. The link arrived by email, and a mailbox somebody else can read would otherwise be a session somebody else gets. ── /sicherheit → /security ───────────────────────────────────────────────── R13: paths are English. Mine was not. The old path stays as a permanent redirect because it has already gone out in mail footers. ── One wordmark ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── "Sometimes it says Cloud and sometimes it does not" — correct. It was on the footer, the placeholder and the maintenance screen, and absent from the header, the sidebar and the sign-in plate. The product is called CluPilot Cloud; that is the name on the invoices and in every mail, so it is now the name everywhere. The console sidebar takes the small size so the lockup, the ADMIN badge and the close button still share one line (R18). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 16:50:29 +02:00
nexxo	f8874f32ea	Put customer instances on their own domain, and say which domains are ours ... ── The zone ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── A fresh install now addresses customer instances under clupilot.cloud rather than clupilot.com. Not branding: a Nextcloud is third-party software that strangers sign in to, and on the same registrable domain as the portal it shares cookie scope, document.domain and CAA with it. The same reason googleusercontent.com and vercel.app exist. Existing installations keep whatever the console says — the zone has been a setting all along. `clupilot:check-zone <zone>` reports what a change would touch before anything is touched: the DNS records, the monitoring targets, the certificates and Nextcloud's trusted_domains all carry the old name and the setting reaches none of them. With no instances in service it says so and stops. Changing it later is a migration with an outage, and the command says that too. ── Which addresses are ours ──────────────────────────────────────────────── A new public page at /sicherheit: the domains that belong to us, the rule for reading an address bar, what we never do, and — the part that matters — what to do if you have already typed your password into a copy of our sign-in form. Change it, end every other session, change it wherever else you use it, tell us. In that order. Reachable without an account, deliberately: somebody who has just given their password away is signed in nowhere, and the page they need cannot be behind the thing they lost. Linked from the three places a person is when the question comes up: every mail footer (the mail is the vector), the sign-in form (this is the page a phishing kit copies, so the real one says which host you are on), and the site footer. The domain list is DERIVED from configuration and keyed by what each domain is for. A list typed into a page would eventually tell a customer that a phishing domain is one of ours, or that one of ours is not — the same two-sources-of-truth failure that had the price sheet promising an address on a domain the company does not own. The operator console is deliberately absent from it: naming it on a public page tells an attacker where to aim. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 16:03:13 +02:00