Commit Graph

3 Commits (f02e86769bf86451fd6a07aaa512a50e0fd1a88a)

Author SHA1 Message Date
nexxo f02e86769b Charge the price the website shows, and hand a withdrawal back in full
tests / pest (push) Failing after 9m21s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 21s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
Stripe was charging the catalogue's NET figure while the document added the
domestic rate on top: a customer quoted 214,80 paid 179,00 and was then invoiced
for VAT nobody had collected. Under para 11(12) UStG that VAT is owed to the tax
office whether or not it ever arrived, so every document issued created a
liability against revenue that did not contain it.

The Stripe Price now carries the GROSS figure. price_cents stays net - it is
frozen onto every contract and PlanChange prorates against it, so redefining it
would corrupt every pro-rata sum ever computed. Only the amount at the till
moved, and it is formed by the one call TaxTreatment already answers for the
price sheet and for the invoice, so displayed, charged and invoiced cannot drift
apart.

Stripe's automatic_tax is deliberately not used. TaxTreatment is the single tax
authority here, and a second rate computed by Stripe would take 19 % from a
German consumer while our document said 20 %.

A Stripe Price cannot be edited, so a changed figure means a new Price and the
old one archived - which stops it being SOLD and leaves every subscription
already on it billing the old amount for ever. stripe:reprice-subscriptions is
the second half, and a command of its own because it touches live money.

A withdrawing consumer is refunded in full, as the owner decided. That is more
generous than FAGG para 16 requires, and it makes the express-request consent the
statute hinges on irrelevant - so the gate is gone rather than left looking
load-bearing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 22:42:02 +02:00
nexxo 6d7c2bdf35 Ask whether they are a consumer, and let one change their mind
tests / pest (push) Failing after 8m35s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 22s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
Three things the product owed its customers and did not have.

**Who is on the other side.** There was no consumer/business flag anywhere,
and `vat_id` was standing in for one — which it cannot: a business without a
VAT number is an ordinary small business, and a consumer with one does not
exist. It is asked at sign-up now, correctable in the portal, and NULL where
nobody has been asked. Unknown is read as CONSUMER everywhere it decides a
right, because that mistake costs us a refund while the other one takes a
statutory right away from somebody who has it.

Reverse charge asks the recorded type instead of the number: an explicit
consumer is charged the domestic rate whatever `vat_id` says — previously they
were not, and anyone could zero their own VAT by getting a number verified. An
unrecorded type still falls back to the verified number, so no contract that is
already running changes rate.

**The fourteen-day right of withdrawal** (FAGG, §312g BGB), for consumers only,
at every door: the window is stamped on the contract when it is concluded, the
customer exercises it from the portal, an operator records one that arrived by
telephone or post, and both go through one action that refuses a business
customer on the server rather than by hiding a card.

The money follows the paperwork rather than being computed beside it. The
invoice is cancelled by a Storno with its own gapless number — nothing is ever
edited or deleted — a new invoice states the pro-rata value of the service
actually delivered (FAGG §16, by days over the term paid for), and the refund
is exactly the difference between the two documents. Where the consumer never
expressly asked for the service to begin at once, they owe nothing and the whole
amount goes back. `StripeClient::refund()` is new, keyed so a retry cannot send
the money twice. The service ends through EndInstanceService and the
`cancellation_scheduled` machinery that was already there.

**The cancel button for modules.** BookAddon::cancelAtPeriodEnd() had no caller
in the interface at all, so a customer could book a recurring charge in two
clicks and had no way to stop it. It is on the module card now, with the date it
runs until and a way back while the cancellation is still pending — and putting
a module back settles nothing, because the term it was cancelled for was paid
for in advance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 21:06:06 +02:00
nexxo 8f1630ba91 Bill a booked module every month, and put it on the invoice
A module was never an item on the Stripe subscription, so it was charged in
the month it was booked and never again. And the renewal document was written
from our own contract snapshot, so it would not have said so even if the money
had been taken. Two halves of one fault, closed together.

Modules are items now. stripe:sync-catalogue mirrors a Product and a Price per
module on both terms — a Stripe Price carries its own interval, and a booking
frozen at an older figure needs its own Price, so they are keyed by module,
amount, currency and interval in stripe_addon_prices. Booking adds an item with
always_invoice: prorated by days AND charged there and then, which is the
invoice the owner wants for a module booked mid-term. A second storage pack is
a quantity on one item, not a second item. Cancelling takes the item off with
no proration — no credit, and the next cycle is simply smaller — while the
module itself is kept until the period end on subscription_addons.cancels_at
and ended by clupilot:end-cancelled-addons.

Documents are built from Stripe's own invoice lines. Stripe is what charged the
customer; a document assembled from our figures would state a sum that is not
the one taken. So every paid Stripe invoice gets one document with one number,
idempotent on stripe_invoice_id — a cycle carrying package and every module
together, a mid-period booking carrying just its prorated line, an upgrade
carrying its proration. Only the wording is ours: each line is named from the
catalogue rather than printed as a Price id, and a line nobody can name stays on
the document under Stripe's own description and is logged. The checkout's own
invoice is still the one exception; that purchase already has a document.

Stripe being away never undoes a booking that has already reached the machine.
The failure is parked on the contract in stripe_addon_sync and swept by the
same clupilot:sync-stripe-subscriptions that retries a plan change, which finds
its work from the bookings themselves rather than from the marker. A granted
contract has no Stripe subscription and is not touched at all.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 20:22:02 +02:00