Commit Graph

8 Commits (f45f290f005e5d3966e047f0cbc2cd9f575c3d0b)

Author SHA1 Message Date
nexxo 32a8bd9a88 Refuse the sale instead of reaching Stripe without a key
Task 5: Billing::purchase() now checks SecretVault for a stripe.secret before
touching anything else — no customer, no plan lookup, no Order row — and the
customer reads a plain sentence instead of a 500 page. HttpStripeClient's own
secret() throws the same StripeNotConfigured exception rather than sending a
request with an empty bearer token and letting Stripe's 401 stand in for the
real cause.

isConfigured() was fixed alongside it: it used to call secret() too, which
would have turned every "is Stripe set up?" check (the checkout controller,
the catalogue sync commands) into an uncaught exception the moment a key went
missing — the opposite of what this task is for. It now reads the vault
directly.

The new guard is unconditional, including for the cart-only purchase types
(storage, addon, plan changes) that never call Stripe themselves — a cart
order nobody can ever pay for is pointless to create. That broke every
existing Billing/Cart/Downgrade test that calls purchase() without a stored
key; each affected fixture now deposits one via the new withStripeSecret()
Pest helper. A few of those tests (CustomDomainAccessTest, DowngradeTest) were
passing already but for the wrong reason — the new guard, not the check they
were named for — since both only assert an order was NOT created; they get
the same fixture fix so they still prove what they claim.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 11:58:01 +02:00
nexxo c36ea17b39 fix(billing): normalise both sides of the VAT comparison; cast the timestamp
tests / pest (push) Successful in 6m45s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 22s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
A verifier that returns the number in display form ("DE 811 907 980") would
have failed the comparison against the normalised current value and silently
switched a genuine reverse-charge customer back to domestic VAT. Both sides are
normalised now, and vat_id_verified_at is a real datetime rather than a string.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 09:36:07 +02:00
nexxo 5aef5e693c fix(billing): verification vouches for a value, not for a row
tests / pest (push) Successful in 6m52s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 20s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
A timestamp alone said "some number was checked once": editing the field left
it intact, so a customer could swap a verified foreign VAT ID for any
plausible-looking one and keep zero-VAT pricing. The verified value is stored
and compared, which makes the rule self-enforcing — no writer has to remember
to clear a flag, and there are several writers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 09:34:40 +02:00
nexxo 42ceafb57f fix(billing): a self-declared VAT ID must not zero the tax
tests / pest (push) Successful in 7m13s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 22s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
Any non-empty string starting with two characters other than AT switched the
customer to reverse charge — typing "XX123" was a 20 % discount. Reverse charge
now requires a VAT ID that is verified, belongs to an EU member state other than
ours, and looks like a VAT number at all. Unverified is the normal state and
means the domestic rate: over-collecting is correctable, under-collecting is a
tax liability.

Changing the number clears its verification. Verification itself (VIES) is not
built yet, so reverse charge stays off until someone confirms a number — which
is the safe direction to be wrong in.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 09:32:42 +02:00
nexxo 76510a59a3 fix(billing): VAT follows the customer, not a global setting
tests / pest (push) Successful in 7m28s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 21s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
Codex was right that this could misstate real charges: an EU business with a
VAT ID registered in another country is billed under reverse charge, and we
were adding 20 % Austrian VAT to their total anyway. TaxTreatment resolves it
from the customer's VAT ID, and the whole page — cart, plan cards, add-on
cards — now states one treatment instead of contradicting itself.

Explicitly NOT handled: cross-border sales to private individuals, which are
taxed at the buyer's national rate under OSS. That needs a maintained rate
table and a tax adviser, not a guess, so those fall back to the domestic rate —
over-collecting rather than under-collecting.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 09:30:17 +02:00
nexxo ac3f429958 fix(billing): round the recurring figure the same way as the total
tests / pest (push) Successful in 7m33s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 21s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
The note rounded VAT after aggregating while the total rounded per order, so
cent-level prices made the two disagree — and a customer who spots that stops
trusting every other number on the page.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 09:27:02 +02:00
nexxo a87a4f512d feat(billing): one plan change at a time, and every price says what it is
Two contradicting plan upgrades sat in the cart at 799 and 399 € — no checkout
could resolve which one the customer meant. Choosing another now replaces the
pending one and says so; add-ons still stack, because buying 200 GB as two packs
is a sensible thing to want.

Every price now states net or gross and how often. The cart shows net per line
with "pro Monat" or "einmalig", then subtotal, VAT and gross — and separates
the monthly recurring amount from a one-off traffic top-up sharing the same
cart, because those are two different commitments. The rate is configurable
(CLUPILOT_TAX_PERCENT, 20 % default) since it follows the seller's country.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 09:23:49 +02:00
nexxo d26200c74b feat(billing): a cart you can actually read and change
tests / pest (push) Successful in 7m10s Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 20s Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped Details
"5 purchases pending" told nobody what they had ordered and offered no way to
change their mind. The billing page now lists each pending purchase by name,
what it costs, when it was added, and the total — with a remove button per row
behind a confirmation, like every other destructive action in the console.

The wording lives on the Order model rather than in the view, so the cart, the
invoice list and any later confirmation mail cannot each invent their own name
for the same row. Removal is scoped to the customer's own still-pending orders,
checked in the modal itself: modals are reachable without the page's guards.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 05:26:49 +02:00