An invoice is a tax document, so two things drive the shape of this.
It is frozen at issue. Everything the finished document says — issuer address,
VAT number, bank details, customer address, every line, the rate, the totals —
is copied into the invoice row when the number is assigned. The PDF is rendered
from that and never stored, which is what was asked for; rendering it from
today's settings instead would have been simpler and wrong, because an address
changed in 2028 would rewrite an invoice from 2026. The width of this table IS
the feature.
Numbers are gapless and ascending, which is a legal requirement rather than a
preference, and that is why none of it is derived from the invoices table.
"Highest number plus one" hands the same number to two sales that land together
and hands a used number back out after a row is removed — a number already
printed on a document somebody holds. The counter is a column, read and advanced
under a row lock inside the caller's transaction, and taking one outside a
transaction throws rather than quietly working.
Four Rechnungskreise seeded — Rechnung, Gutschrift, Storno, Anzahlung — each
with its own prefix and its own counter, because a credit note is not an
invoice with a minus sign in front of it. Seeded rather than left to the
operator: an installation with no series cannot issue anything, and discovering
that at the first sale is the worst possible moment.
TCPDF added, for the renderer that comes next.
There is deliberately no test for the outside-a-transaction guard, and a note
where it would have been: RefreshDatabase opens a transaction around every
test, so the guard cannot fire and a green test for it would be green for a
reason that has nothing to do with the guard.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The SSH private key CluPilot deploys to every host is now stored through
SecretVault (ssh.private_key), preferred over CLUPILOT_SSH_PRIVATE_KEY(_PATH)
at all three real consumers — SshTraefikWriter and HostStep::keyLogin.
kuma.password/kuma.totp stay in .env: they authenticate a separate Python
container at boot, and nothing in this app reads them, so the vault would
have nothing to wire them to.
A new /admin/infrastructure page, backed by App\Support\ProvisioningSettings,
makes the non-secret deployment settings that used to force a shell —
DNS zone, WireGuard hub endpoint and public key, Traefik's dynamic-config
path, the SSH public key, and the monitoring bridge URL — visible and
editable from the console, each wired to every real consumer. WG subnet/hub
IP and Kuma's own connection details stay in .env: the compose file and a
separate container read those before this application ever does.
Two of the Zugangsdaten page's three entries were decorative: whatever an
operator typed was encrypted and stored, but HttpHetznerDnsClient and
HttpMonitoringClient still read config() directly, so the stored value never
reached an outgoing request. Both now resolve through SecretVault::get() at
the point of use, matching how the Stripe client already worked.
Four templates, one layout. Two of them — the maintenance announcement and its
cancellation — still wore Laravel's markdown component, which brings its own
logo, its own button and its own footer: the product was sending mail that
looked like two different companies, one of which was the framework.
New: an order confirmation, sent when the payment lands rather than when
provisioning finishes. Those are minutes apart at best and can be much longer,
and somebody who has just been charged and heard nothing assumes the worst
about both the charge and the product. It deliberately promises no time for the
cloud itself — provisioning takes what it takes, CloudReady announces the end,
and a promised minute that slips is worse than no promise. Queued after the
transaction, never inside it, and never allowed to fail the webhook: Stripe
retries anything that is not a 2xx, and a retry would re-enter provisioning
over a mail server having a bad minute.
The finished-cloud mail now names what was actually built — address, plan,
storage, location — because somebody who ordered a fortnight ago is checking it
against what they bought, and that is a comparison rather than a sentence. Still
no credential in it.
Two tests earn their place. One holds every template on the shared layout, so a
new one written in a hurry cannot copy-paste its way back to the framework's.
The other proves the finished-cloud mail carries no password — asserted against
the data the mail is given and the HTML it renders, not against the template's
source, because the first version of that test tripped over the word in a
comment and would have passed a template that leaked the value through a
variable. It tested the prose, not the mail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Registration opened an account that could sign in immediately on an address
nobody had proved was theirs — and anybody can type a stranger's into a
registration form. Both halves were commented out: the Fortify feature and
MustVerifyEmail on the model.
`verified` sits on the whole portal group rather than on the pages that spend
money. An unconfirmed address is not a billing problem to be caught at
checkout; it is an account that may not belong to the person holding it, and
the servers, the users and the backups behind it are worth as much to whoever
typed the address as to whoever owns it.
The mail is a Mailable in this product's design rather than Laravel's
notification, which would arrive with the framework's logo, button and footer
as the first thing anybody ever receives from CluPilot. It also has to leave
through the SYSTEM mailbox like every other account mail, which the
notification path does not do on its own.
The link is signed and expires, and the address is part of what is signed — so
a link issued to a mistyped address stops working the moment the address is
corrected, rather than confirming an address nobody can read. Tests cover the
tampered link, the expired one, the corrected address, and one account trying
to confirm another.
The waiting page is ours (Fortify has views off) and offers the only two things
that move somebody forward: send it again, or sign out and register with the
address they meant. The resend is throttled, because otherwise it is a button
that makes the server send mail to an arbitrary address as fast as it can be
clicked. Somebody already confirmed is redirected away from it — the `verified`
middleware only guards the other direction.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Completes the device work: the warning mail now has somewhere to send people.
A warning whose only advice is "if this was not you, take action" names a
problem and hands back nothing to do about it.
Both sides get their own component rather than one shared with the guard passed
in. Operators and customers are two guards and two tables (R21) — a component
taking the guard as input is one forged property away from listing and ending
the other side's sessions. Every query in SessionRegistry is scoped by guard as
well as by id for the same reason, and three tests hold that line, because the
unscoped version looks exactly like a working feature while doing it.
TouchLoginSession keeps each row pointing at the session it describes. Both
sign-in paths raise the Login event BEFORE session()->regenerate(), so the row
is written against an id that is dead a moment later — and the once-a-minute
throttle would have held the correction back for the first minute of every
session, hiding the session its reader is sitting in. A changed id is therefore
never throttled.
A session counts as live only if the framework's row exists AND was touched
within the session lifetime. The join alone is not enough: Laravel collects
expired sessions by lottery, so on a quiet installation rows sit there for days
and the list would offer somebody a laptop they shut last month.
Ending the others goes through the product's own modal (R23) and leaves the
asking session alone: signing somebody out of the page they are using to sign
other people out is not what the button says.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sessions lived in Redis, where they cannot be enumerated — one key per session,
no index by user — so "where am I signed in" and "end that one" were not
answerable at all. The database driver keeps a row per session and makes ending
one a delete. It costs every currently signed-in person one forced sign-in,
once, which is why it is happening now rather than later.
The warning is only worth anything if it is rare, so the two obvious signals
are deliberately not used. Not the IP: it changes on every train, every café,
every mobile handover, and behind a VPN it is not theirs to begin with. Not the
user-agent: Chrome ships every four weeks and the string changes each time,
which would be twelve warnings a year per customer, describing nothing. A
device is a long-lived signed cookie holding a random token, and nothing else
is consulted. The honest cost — cleared cookies, a private window, a second
browser — is written into the mail itself, because a reader who thinks the
warning is wrong stops reading the next one.
Three things the tests found or hold:
The first device on an account is new and must not warn. Replying to somebody
creating an account by telling them they signed in from a new device is noise
on the one message that has to stay worth reading.
token_hash was globally unique, and the shared-browser test failed on it. Two
people on one machine share one cookie and must each own a device row against
it; the obvious repair — issue a fresh token for the second — would orphan the
first person's row and warn them about their own desk. Unique is now per
identity.
Recording a device may never block a sign-in. A safeguard that locks the owner
out when it breaks has stopped being one, so the listener logs and swallows,
and a test drops the tables to prove it.
Sessions are linked by a uuid carried inside the session payload rather than by
the session id, which Laravel rotates on every sign-in and every regenerate().
Laravel's own sessions.user_id cannot carry the link either: it is filled from
the default guard, while operators and customers are two guards and two tables
(R21) — operator 1 and customer 1 would each be offered the other's sessions.
Also lands the shared mail layout the rest of the templates will use: tables
and inline styles for Outlook, no image and no web font because half of all
clients block remote content, and the button in --accent-active rather than the
brand orange, which is 2.9:1 against white.
Not tagged: the session list is not built yet, and without a tag no server can
install this.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An earlier edit removed the ADMIN_HOSTS example line and left its
"Beispiel:" dangling into the VPN_CONFIG_KEY block, so the file
documented neither properly. SECRETS_KEY was never in here at all —
without it the console silently stores no credentials, which is exactly
the kind of thing an example file exists to prevent.
The password no longer travels through third-party mail servers or sits
forever in an inbox: it moves onto the instance (encrypted, same as
nc_admin_ref) and shows on the dashboard until the customer clicks
"Notiert", which deletes it for good.
Asked for directly: a commit on main must change nothing on a server, and only
a tag whose version is higher than the installed one may be installed.
The agent asked two different questions before this. A pinned server compared
tags; everything else counted commits on its branch — so a console following
main offered an update for every push, verified or not, and "Jetzt
aktualisieren" meant "take whatever is on the branch right now". Landing on main
and being released are different events, and only the second is a decision
somebody made.
It is one question now, regardless of what the checkout is attached to: is there
a tag whose version is higher than the deployed one? Compared with sort -V
against the version in the deployment manifest — not the VERSION file, which an
update moves before it migrates, so a run that failed in between would leave the
checkout claiming a version it never finished installing. A run always targets
that tag; the branch path is gone. A request that arrives with nothing to
install is answered rather than obeyed, before anything announces a run.
The console follows: the button is disabled with nothing released, says so in a
line rather than leaving a grey button to be guessed at, names the version it
would install rather than a count, and refuses the action server-side as well —
a Livewire action is a public endpoint, and one place a rule may not live is
only in the disabled attribute of a button.
VERSION becomes 1.1.0, to be tagged as the first release this mechanism can see.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Found uncommitted in the working tree at the start of this session and carried
in as its own commit so it can be reverted on its own. Not written here: a
cancel action that clears an unconfirmed secret, the wording for every state of
the page, and a rebuilt setup view. The suite is green with it in place,
including the R18-R23 scan tests.
The code was immutable, which made a typo permanent. It cannot be freely mutable
either, and not only because hosts.datacenter references it: each host's DNS name
was minted from it and registered at the provider, the machine's own hostname was
set from it as it was built, the counter handing out those numbers is keyed by
it, and every past order stores it as plain text with no foreign key to follow.
Renaming a code with hosts in it is not a rename — it is a datacenter called hel
full of machines called fsn-01.
So it is editable exactly while nothing references it, which is the case that
matters: a typo noticed shortly after creating one. Once a host or an order
depends on it the field is disabled and says what is holding it, with the
numbers. The lock is recomputed from the database on every save, never read back
from the property the browser returns.
Alongside it, an optional free-text field for the specific datacenter —
fsn-dc-15. A provider runs several within one location, on separate power and
separate uplinks, and two entries both reading "Falkenstein (fsn)" are not a
choice anybody can make. Nothing keys off it; the code remains the identifier.
Also renames the country loop variables in the edit modal. They were $code and
$name — the component's own properties — and shadowed them for the rest of the
file. Harmless while nothing below the loop read them, which stopped being true
the moment the code became an editable field above it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Checking for updates was a request written into the same mailbox as a real
update, collected by the same agent on the same systemd timer — so asking what
was new was answered on the next tick, and the console, having nothing else to
show, counted down to it. An operator who asked a question was told an update
would start in 3:44.
A systemd path unit now wakes the agent the moment the request file is written,
for a check and for a run alike. PathChanged, not PathExists: PathExists re-arms
as soon as the service goes inactive, so a request the agent could not consume —
it holds a lock for the length of an update — would restart it in a tight loop.
The timer stays as the fallback, and a drop-in disables systemd's start rate
limit, because two triggers on one oneshot service can otherwise wedge the unit
and leave neither of them able to run.
The countdown is gone from both the settings card and the maintenance overlay.
It could not be made honest: its target was recomputed on every poll, and where
the interval the agent reports is shorter than the timer actually installed on
that host it had already gone by, so the fallback moved it forward again each
time. It ran backwards four seconds and snapped back to a full minute, forever —
reported exactly that way. A queued run says it is starting; a queued check says
nothing beyond its badge, because a check starts nothing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
VpnConfigAccess::reveal() dereferenced Auth::guard('operator')->user()
unguarded, which is null when a modal's session has ended since it was
opened (a Livewire action reaches its component through /livewire/update
on its own, without the page's original route middleware). The same
unguarded pattern was in TwoFactorSetup, InstanceAdminAccess and Settings.
Add App\Livewire\Concerns\ResolvesOperator with currentOperator(), the one
place that resolves the operator and redirects to admin.login when there
isn't one, and use it everywhere the pattern occurred.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A blocked outbound port (587 filtered at a firewall, as on the live
server) left both MailboxTester and MailboxTransport blocking until
PHP's default_socket_timeout (60s) or the reverse proxy cut the
request — a 504 with no error the operator ever saw. Mail::build()
honours a 'timeout' config key by calling SocketStream::setTimeout()
(confirmed by reading MailManager::configureSmtpTransport() and by an
end-to-end run against a genuinely unroutable host), so MailboxTester
now passes 'timeout' => 10 through it. MailboxTransport builds its
EsmtpTransport directly rather than through Mail::build(), so it sets
the same call on the transport's stream, at 30s — a queue worker can
afford to wait longer than an operator watching a browser, and a
timed-out send is retried rather than lost.
The test button also now shows a visible "sending" state while the
request is in flight, matching the wire:loading span pattern already
used on admin/host-create's save button — previously only
wire:loading.attr="disabled" fired, leaving a greyed-out button with
no other sign anything was happening.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
completeLogin() re-checks isActive()/isOperator() immediately before signing
in, not only at the password step. The two-factor challenge previously only
confirmed the operator row still existed (Operator::find() + a null check),
so disabling an operator or revoking every console role in the window between
the password step and the pending code did not stop the login from
completing — the realistic case is an owner locking someone out mid-login,
not a contrived one.
One check, in the static method both OperatorLogin's direct exit and
OperatorTwoFactorChallenge::verify() already share, rather than a second copy
in the challenge. completeLogin() now returns bool instead of void: false
means refused, and neither the guard nor the session was touched. Each caller
turns that into a ValidationException in its own vocabulary — 'email' /
auth.failed for the direct exit (already unreachable in practice, since
authenticate() just checked the same two conditions synchronously; kept for
defense in depth), 'code' / auth.not_an_operator for the challenge, since the
code entered may be genuinely correct and reusing "wrong code" would mislead.
The three sites that refuse to create or rename an operator onto a
customer's email (Admin\Settings::saveAccount(), ::inviteStaff(), and
clupilot:create-operator) all checked Customer::where('email', ...) as
a proxy for "does this address already have a portal login". A users
row with no matching customers row — an email changed on one side
only, or legacy/orphaned data — passed straight through: this dev
database already had one.
Extracted the three copies into Customer::emailTaken(), which checks
both tables directly, so the three sites cannot drift from each other
again.
The setup-route exemption already went through AdminArea::routeIs(),
which matches both admin.<name> and admin.via*.<name>. The logout
exemption next to it used a bare $request->routeIs('admin.logout'),
which matches only the canonical name — on a recovery hostname the
logout route is admin.via0.logout, so the check failed there and an
unenrolled operator's logout POST bounced back to enrolment instead
of being let through, on exactly the host that exists because the
canonical one is not working.
RequireOperatorTwoFactor exempted the whole of admin.settings while
compulsory two-factor was on, on the theory that it was "the page
where two-factor is set up". That component also carries staff
management, site visibility, network restrictions, account changes,
and the two-factor policy switch itself, so an unenrolled operator got
unrestricted access to all of that, not just enrolment.
Enrolment (secret, QR, confirm, recovery codes, regenerate, disable)
moves to its own route and component, admin.two-factor-setup /
Admin\TwoFactorSetup, reachable by every operator regardless of
capability. That is now the only page the middleware exempts besides
logout, and its redirect points there instead. admin.settings goes
back behind the policy like every other console page; only the policy
switch itself stays there, since only someone who already satisfies
it should be the one changing it.
EnsureCustomerActive used session()->invalidate() to sign a suspended
or closed customer out. In shared-host mode the console and the
portal keep their login key in one session, so invalidate() (flush()
+ migrate(true)) silently signed out an operator elsewhere in that
same browser too. Same fix as the console's own /logout route:
regenerate() gets a fresh session id without flushing attributes
belonging to another guard.
confirmPassword() already checked the right account per guard, but the
session marker it stamped, auth.password_confirmed_at, was one flat
key shared by every guard. In shared-host mode the portal and console
guards keep their login in the same session, so confirming a
customer's portal password left the marker in place for an
operator-only gate too. One private method now computes the key for
all three callers so they cannot drift apart again.
PublicSiteGate let anyone through on a bare Auth::guard('operator')->check(),
which stays true for a disabled operator's live session — disabling
someone does not sign them out, so it never stopped this gate from
showing them the real site indefinitely, even though EnsureAdmin
already treats them as inactive. Now requires the same thing EnsureAdmin
does: an active operator holding a console role.
Chosen to merely ignore an invalid operator session here rather than log
it out. This gate only decides what one request sees; logging out would
ripple into whatever else that session is doing (a concurrent console
tab, mid-task), a bigger side effect than a visibility check exists to
have. EnsureAdmin sets the precedent — it also rejects a disabled
operator per request without touching their session.
Customer::ensureUser() enforced uniqueness only within users, so a
customer provisioned (or registering publicly) with an operator's email
got a second, colliding identity for the same address — the exact thing
R21 exists to prevent. Checks Operator by address now, not by session
(the deleted assertNotAdmin() checked who was signed in, which could
never be the right question).
Public registration gets the same guard via a plain unique() validation
rule, reusing Laravel's stock "already taken" message rather than a
dedicated one — naming the collision specifically would tell a public
visitor an address belongs to staff, a worse leak than the generic
refusal every other collision here already gives them.
Impersonation answers 409 instead of crashing into it. The Stripe
webhook keeps recording the paid order (same principle as
openContract()'s own comment: the order is proof money changed hands)
and withholds only the colliding login, logged for an operator to
resolve by hand.
Verified the reverse direction Codex flagged as already covered: two
Admin\Settings actions and the clupilot:create-operator command all
already refuse an operator email that collides with a customer's, and
that check is sound today because every users row is created in
lockstep with a customers row of the same email (CreateNewUser and
ensureUser are the only two creation sites, both confirmed by grep) and
nothing in this app can change a user's email afterwards (Fortify's
updateProfileInformation feature is disabled, and no other code calls
that action).
console.require_2fa exempted admin.settings from the redirect it forces on
an unconfirmed operator, but that page only ever configured the global
policy — nobody could enrol behind it. A newly invited operator stayed
permanently redirected to a page with no way to satisfy the requirement,
the opposite of what the switch was for.
Adds enable/confirm/regenerate/disable to Admin\Settings, reusing Fortify's
own actions exactly as the portal's Settings already does — they only ever
touch the model they're handed, no guard or auth() call inside them, so
pointing ConfirmsPassword's guard at 'operator' is the only change needed.
The new card is deliberately not gated behind the site.manage capability
that hides the rest of this page's Owner-only sections: the compulsory
switch applies to every operator, so enrolment has to be reachable by every
operator too. Dropped the account card's stale hint pointing at a "separate
security area" that never existed.
POST /broadcasting/auth carries only the 'web' middleware group
(Laravel's own withBroadcasting() registers it that way), so
PusherBroadcaster::auth() resolved retrieveUser() on the DEFAULT guard
before the admin.runs channel's own Auth::guard('operator') check ever
ran — found nobody, since an operator is never signed in on 'web', and
threw straight from there. The guard was correct but unreachable.
Fixed by naming both guards on the channel registration itself.
Also adds broadcasting/auth to RestrictAdminHost::SHARED: in exclusive
mode it was neither admin.* by name nor on the shared list, so it 404'd
on the console host too — degrading silently to wire:poll.4s rather
than breaking outright, which is why nothing screamed.
It checked Auth::guard('operator')->check() instead of the users row it
was handed, so with an operator's own session still attached (shared
mode carries the same cookie through both legs of impersonation) it
threw the moment a customer's email already had a users row — a 500 on
the first impersonation of anyone who had signed into the portal
themselves. Deleting it rather than fixing the check: operators live in
`operators` now, never in `users` (R21), so a users row can no longer
BE an operator account for this to guard against. Also drops the dead
`'is_admin' => false` write — the column reads from nowhere any more.
redirect()->to(AdminArea::home()) resolved against whatever host the
leave() POST itself arrived on — the portal's, once the console has a
hostname of its own — landing the operator on the portal's dashboard
instead of back at the console. route('admin.overview') is domain-bound
to the console and generates the correct cross-host URL, matching what
this line did before this branch. The test named after this behaviour
now actually asserts it.
Deleted tests/Feature/Auth/ConsoleLoginLandsInTheConsoleTest.php — it tested
the three deleted response classes. Its intent (an operator's sign-in landing
in the console, not the portal) is covered by OperatorLoginTest's "signs an
operator in on the operator guard" and OperatorTwoFactorChallengeTest's "signs
the operator in once the code actually checks out", both confirmed present
before deletion; the route-separation half is covered by the new
ConsoleHostSeparationTest cases added in this commit.
saveServer() wrote host/port/encryption without touching any mailbox, so
the console kept showing every mailbox as verified against a server
nothing had tested since. Mirrors EditMailbox::save()'s existing guard on
a single mailbox's own identity, just at server scope: only clears when a
field actually changed, so re-saving unedited values leaves a real
verification alone.
Both places now delegate the actual clear to new Mailbox::
invalidateVerification()/invalidateAllVerifications() methods rather than
touching last_verified_at directly, sharing the mutation. The "did this
change" comparison stays separate in each caller - one diffs a loaded
model's attributes, the other diffs persisted settings against incoming
scalars, and forcing them through one function would add machinery no
actual duplication justifies.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
MailboxTester required a usable SECRETS_KEY unconditionally, refusing an
unauthenticated relay's test-send on a fresh install with no key yet, even
though real sending never touches the cipher for that mailbox. Gated the
check on authenticates, same as the password-presence check beside it.
Comparison pass across MailboxTester and MailboxTransport turned up two more
of the same shape. MailboxTransport's delegate-cache fingerprint decrypted
$box->password unconditionally, even when unauthenticated and never going to
use it — a mailbox that once authenticated, stored a password, and later had
authenticates unchecked would crash real sending the moment SECRETS_KEY
became unusable. And MailboxTester had no guard against a stored port <1;
Symfony silently reinterprets that as port 25 rather than refusing it, so the
test button could reach whatever happens to listen there and report success
for a configuration MailboxTransport refuses outright.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An SMTP relay with a host and a from address but no username or password
- a trusted local or private-network relay - always used to be seeded as
a placeholder, because the takeover required a username to treat an
account as real, and Mailbox::isConfigured() always required a stored
password. Laravel's own SMTP mailer has supported unauthenticated relays
all along.
Add mailboxes.authenticates (default true, so every existing row keeps
its current behaviour) to tell "does not authenticate" apart from
"authenticates, but nobody has typed the password yet" - the same empty
password column used to mean both. The takeover migration now seeds the
real account off the host/address alone and marks it authenticates=false
only when neither a username nor a password resolved; isConfigured(),
MailboxTransport and MailboxTester all read it before requiring or
sending a password; the edit modal gets a checkbox for it with the
password field's hint updated to match, in both languages.
isUsable() checked only "is SECRETS_KEY nonempty", so a set-but-malformed
key (wrong length, garbage base64) read back as usable even though
encrypter() rejects it two lines below. EditMailbox::save() and
MailboxTester::run() both gate on isUsable() specifically to avoid an
uncaught RuntimeException reaching the operator; a lying isUsable() meant
that guard did not fire in exactly the configuration it exists for.
Both methods now read resolveKey() — the base64: prefix, the raw-base64
path, the 32-byte check — so they cannot disagree about a value either
one is given. SecretVault::isUsable() and the secrets console page's
"no key" banner both delegate down to this and are covered here too, not
assumed to inherit the fix correctly.
savePurposes() only checked that each key was a nonempty string, so a
stale or tampered mailbox key (reachable by posting straight to
/livewire/update) saved successfully while MailboxResolver silently
returned null for it. Every purpose's key must now name a mailbox that
exists; system's must additionally be active, since every unmapped or
inactive OTHER purpose falls through to it.
EditMailbox::save() also cleared last_verified_at only when the
password changed, but smtpUsername() depends on address and username
too (falling back to address when username is blank) — changing
either while leaving the password untouched kept showing a successful
verification for an identity nothing had actually tested.
EsmtpTransport's autoTls (default true) and requireTls (default false)
are independent of the implicit-TLS constructor argument: 'tls' left
these at their defaults, so a server that omitted STARTTLS sent
mailbox credentials in the clear while reporting success, and 'none'
would silently upgrade the moment a server offered STARTTLS. Both
MailboxTransport and MailboxTester already duplicated the "ssl, or
port 465 ⇒ implicit" half of this decision independently; MailTlsPolicy
is now the one place both read, for both dimensions.
MailboxTester still builds through Mail::build() rather than a hand-built
transport: MailManager::createSmtpTransport() forwards the whole config
array to EsmtpTransportFactory as DSN options, which already reads
auto_tls/require_tls itself, so the same policy reaches this path
through keys the config array already supports.
I3: nothing stopped an operator unchecking Aktiv on the mailbox that
mail.purpose.system points at. MailboxResolver::active() filters an
inactive mailbox at BOTH the direct lookup and the system fallback, so
that one checkbox could take mail.purpose.system to null and every
purpose without its own mapping down with it — the existing
system_required guard on savePurposes() reads as if this were covered,
but it only blocks the empty-mapping path, not this one.
EditMailbox::save() now refuses active=false against the mailbox 'system'
currently points at, the same way savePurposes() already refuses to leave
'system' empty.
I4: Admin\Mail::saveServer() writes mail.host — the platform's outbound
relay for every purpose mailbox at once — and CloudReady::toMail() puts a
customer's Nextcloud admin password in cleartext in the message body. So a
signed-in mail.manage session was already a credential-interception
primitive, the same threat Admin\Secrets' second gate exists for. Both
saveServer() and EditMailbox::save() (only when a new password is actually
being typed) now also require passwordRecentlyConfirmed(), following the
ConfirmsPassword pattern Secrets.php and Settings.php's two-factor actions
already use — including their per-action UI shape (an inline confirm form
scoped to the gated action), not a whole-page lock, so address, display
name, username, no-reply, active and the purpose mapping stay reachable
without confirming, per the brief's capability split.
Both gated and ungated paths are covered by tests, and both guards were
mutated away and confirmed to fail before being restored.
nexxo