PlanChange could say what a move would cost and whether it was allowed, and
that was all it could do. Billing::purchase() wrote an upgrade order and
nothing ever consumed it: same snapshot, same machine, same quota. A customer
could pay for a bigger package and receive nothing.
ApplyPlanChange is now the single place a change lands — it moves the contract
onto the target's current version, writes one register row, settles the custom
domain, and starts a run that resizes the machine. Applying the same order
twice is a no-op, enforced by a unique event key rather than by a check two
callers could both pass.
Two things a plan change must not do, and now does not. A disk is never shrunk
— Proxmox cannot, so the QUOTA shrinks instead, which is what was sold anyway.
And a live machine is never rebooted as a side effect: cores and RAM are
written, and where they need a restart the instance says so where an operator
and the customer can both see it.
The storage allowance also joins the build pipeline. ApplyStorageQuota was
written for plan changes and ran only there, so a brand-new customer still got
no quota at all — quota_gb reached the instance row and stopped, and every
package delivered the whole disk. The test guarding that pipeline only counted
its steps, which is how a list missing the one step that makes a package's
storage real stayed green for its whole life. It now names the step.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The landing page was registered host-agnostically, so app.clupilot.com served
it: marketing copy, a pricing table and a "sign up" call to action, at the
address where a customer's servers live. Reported exactly that way.
SITE_HOST binds the website to its own hostname. Every other host — the portal,
a bare IP — answers "/" with the product: the dashboard for somebody signed in,
the sign-in page for everybody else. Never a 404 there: "/" is what people type
from memory, and turning that into an error page to make a point about
hostnames helps nobody. Empty keeps today's behaviour, which every development
machine reached by IP depends on.
The console is unaffected — its routes are registered first and win on their
own host, the ordering the status page above already documents.
The legal pages are deliberately not bound. An imprint has to be reachable from
wherever the reader is standing, and a mail footer links to it from whichever
host sent the mail.
Also drops "just reply to this message" from two mails. A reply lands in the
billing or provisioning mailbox rather than in the support queue somebody
actually works through — so it now says to raise it in the portal, where it
gets a place in that queue instead of getting lost.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four templates, one layout. Two of them — the maintenance announcement and its
cancellation — still wore Laravel's markdown component, which brings its own
logo, its own button and its own footer: the product was sending mail that
looked like two different companies, one of which was the framework.
New: an order confirmation, sent when the payment lands rather than when
provisioning finishes. Those are minutes apart at best and can be much longer,
and somebody who has just been charged and heard nothing assumes the worst
about both the charge and the product. It deliberately promises no time for the
cloud itself — provisioning takes what it takes, CloudReady announces the end,
and a promised minute that slips is worse than no promise. Queued after the
transaction, never inside it, and never allowed to fail the webhook: Stripe
retries anything that is not a 2xx, and a retry would re-enter provisioning
over a mail server having a bad minute.
The finished-cloud mail now names what was actually built — address, plan,
storage, location — because somebody who ordered a fortnight ago is checking it
against what they bought, and that is a comparison rather than a sentence. Still
no credential in it.
Two tests earn their place. One holds every template on the shared layout, so a
new one written in a hurry cannot copy-paste its way back to the framework's.
The other proves the finished-cloud mail carries no password — asserted against
the data the mail is given and the HTML it renders, not against the template's
source, because the first version of that test tripped over the word in a
comment and would have passed a template that leaked the value through a
variable. It tested the prose, not the mail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The password no longer travels through third-party mail servers or sits
forever in an inbox: it moves onto the instance (encrypted, same as
nc_admin_ref) and shows on the dashboard until the customer clicks
"Notiert", which deletes it for good.
nexxo