37 Commits (v1.3.39)
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2277dfe4cb |
Ask the EU register whether a VAT number is real
tests / pest (push) Failing after 8m24s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 26s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
vat_id_verified_at was declared on the customer and read by TaxTreatment, and set by no code anywhere. hasVerifiedVatId() therefore never returned true, so reverse charge could not trigger for anybody - and every EU business customer was invoiced Austrian VAT they cannot reclaim in their own country, which is not a pass-through for them but a real cost until the invoice is corrected. The check has THREE outcomes, and the third is why VatIdCheck exists. VIES is a gateway onto twenty-seven national registers and any of them is regularly down. Reading "I could not ask" as "not registered" would clear a verification that has stood for months, move that customer onto the domestic rate, and change what their next invoice says - because a register was asleep. Reading it as "registered" would put reverse charge on an unchecked number, which is our liability. So on UNAVAILABLE nothing at all is written. Asked at the moment the number is entered, because that is when somebody is looking at the field and can fix a typo. The save has already happened by then and the check cannot undo it: a register that is down must not cost a customer their address change. Shape and membership are refused before a request is spent, and the fake refuses on the same rule as the real verifier. A fake that answers where VIES would never have been asked is not a simplification but a different product, and free text normalises into a well-formed number more easily than it looks - "not a number" becomes NOTANUMBER, which the shape rule alone reads as a Norwegian one. clupilot:verify-vat-ids re-asks about the numbers reverse charge rests on, since a registration can be withdrawn. Deliberately not scheduled: it queries a public service with a concurrency limit on behalf of somebody else's tax position, and the cadence is the owner's to set. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
f02e86769b |
Charge the price the website shows, and hand a withdrawal back in full
tests / pest (push) Failing after 9m21s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 21s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Stripe was charging the catalogue's NET figure while the document added the domestic rate on top: a customer quoted 214,80 paid 179,00 and was then invoiced for VAT nobody had collected. Under para 11(12) UStG that VAT is owed to the tax office whether or not it ever arrived, so every document issued created a liability against revenue that did not contain it. The Stripe Price now carries the GROSS figure. price_cents stays net - it is frozen onto every contract and PlanChange prorates against it, so redefining it would corrupt every pro-rata sum ever computed. Only the amount at the till moved, and it is formed by the one call TaxTreatment already answers for the price sheet and for the invoice, so displayed, charged and invoiced cannot drift apart. Stripe's automatic_tax is deliberately not used. TaxTreatment is the single tax authority here, and a second rate computed by Stripe would take 19 % from a German consumer while our document said 20 %. A Stripe Price cannot be edited, so a changed figure means a new Price and the old one archived - which stops it being SOLD and leaves every subscription already on it billing the old amount for ever. stripe:reprice-subscriptions is the second half, and a command of its own because it touches live money. A withdrawing consumer is refunded in full, as the owner decided. That is more generous than FAGG para 16 requires, and it makes the express-request consent the statute hinges on irrelevant - so the gate is gone rather than left looking load-bearing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
6d7c2bdf35 |
Ask whether they are a consumer, and let one change their mind
tests / pest (push) Failing after 8m35s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 22s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Three things the product owed its customers and did not have. **Who is on the other side.** There was no consumer/business flag anywhere, and `vat_id` was standing in for one — which it cannot: a business without a VAT number is an ordinary small business, and a consumer with one does not exist. It is asked at sign-up now, correctable in the portal, and NULL where nobody has been asked. Unknown is read as CONSUMER everywhere it decides a right, because that mistake costs us a refund while the other one takes a statutory right away from somebody who has it. Reverse charge asks the recorded type instead of the number: an explicit consumer is charged the domestic rate whatever `vat_id` says — previously they were not, and anyone could zero their own VAT by getting a number verified. An unrecorded type still falls back to the verified number, so no contract that is already running changes rate. **The fourteen-day right of withdrawal** (FAGG, §312g BGB), for consumers only, at every door: the window is stamped on the contract when it is concluded, the customer exercises it from the portal, an operator records one that arrived by telephone or post, and both go through one action that refuses a business customer on the server rather than by hiding a card. The money follows the paperwork rather than being computed beside it. The invoice is cancelled by a Storno with its own gapless number — nothing is ever edited or deleted — a new invoice states the pro-rata value of the service actually delivered (FAGG §16, by days over the term paid for), and the refund is exactly the difference between the two documents. Where the consumer never expressly asked for the service to begin at once, they owe nothing and the whole amount goes back. `StripeClient::refund()` is new, keyed so a retry cannot send the money twice. The service ends through EndInstanceService and the `cancellation_scheduled` machinery that was already there. **The cancel button for modules.** BookAddon::cancelAtPeriodEnd() had no caller in the interface at all, so a customer could book a recurring charge in two clicks and had no way to stop it. It is on the module card now, with the date it runs until and a way back while the cancellation is still pending — and putting a module back settles nothing, because the term it was cancelled for was paid for in advance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
8f1630ba91 |
Bill a booked module every month, and put it on the invoice
A module was never an item on the Stripe subscription, so it was charged in the month it was booked and never again. And the renewal document was written from our own contract snapshot, so it would not have said so even if the money had been taken. Two halves of one fault, closed together. Modules are items now. stripe:sync-catalogue mirrors a Product and a Price per module on both terms — a Stripe Price carries its own interval, and a booking frozen at an older figure needs its own Price, so they are keyed by module, amount, currency and interval in stripe_addon_prices. Booking adds an item with always_invoice: prorated by days AND charged there and then, which is the invoice the owner wants for a module booked mid-term. A second storage pack is a quantity on one item, not a second item. Cancelling takes the item off with no proration — no credit, and the next cycle is simply smaller — while the module itself is kept until the period end on subscription_addons.cancels_at and ended by clupilot:end-cancelled-addons. Documents are built from Stripe's own invoice lines. Stripe is what charged the customer; a document assembled from our figures would state a sum that is not the one taken. So every paid Stripe invoice gets one document with one number, idempotent on stripe_invoice_id — a cycle carrying package and every module together, a mid-period booking carrying just its prorated line, an upgrade carrying its proration. Only the wording is ours: each line is named from the catalogue rather than printed as a Price id, and a line nobody can name stays on the document under Stripe's own description and is logged. The checkout's own invoice is still the one exception; that purchase already has a document. Stripe being away never undoes a booking that has already reached the machine. The failure is parked on the contract in stripe_addon_sync and swept by the same clupilot:sync-stripe-subscriptions that retries a plan change, which finds its work from the bookings themselves rather than from the marker. A granted contract has no Stripe subscription and is not touched at all. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
35b312d5ef |
Invoice every renewal, and tell Stripe when the package changes
Two things Stripe was doing on its own, without us. **A renewal produced no invoice and no mail.** InvoiceMail went out from exactly one place — the first purchase — so a customer paying every month for a year received one invoice, for month one. Stripe already says when the money lands: invoice.paid with billing_reason subscription_cycle. What was missing was the document. A renewal has no Order behind it, and one was not invented for the occasion: an Order is something a customer bought, and writing a purchase nobody made would corrupt the record of what they have actually ordered. IssueInvoice::forBilledPeriod() issues from the CONTRACT instead, at its frozen net price, for the term Stripe billed. Idempotent against the Stripe invoice id, which is unique in the database rather than checked in PHP — and because the number is drawn inside the same transaction as the row, a redelivery takes its number back with it and the series keeps its sequence. Nothing in the paperwork can fail the webhook: issuing and mailing are both caught and logged, exactly as confirmByMail() does. Only a cycle renewal gets a document. The checkout's own invoice already has one; an upgrade's proration was worked out against Stripe's boundaries and would not match a document written from our snapshot; a charge raised by hand is for something this catalogue cannot describe. All three stay in the register, and are logged once as money no document of ours covers. **After a plan change, Stripe went on billing the old price.** There was no way to move a subscription onto another price at all, so a customer who upgraded paid for the smaller package every month afterwards. The client can now swap one, the item id it needs is learnt from Stripe's own events (and asked for once, for contracts older than the column), and the behaviour is chosen per direction: an upgrade settles immediately, so the cycle invoice stays exactly the contract price the renewal document states; a downgrade lands at the period boundary and settles nothing. A granted contract has no Stripe subscription and is left untouched. A change that reaches the machine and not Stripe is never rolled back — it is parked on the contract with the error and the behaviour it needed, logged as an error, and retried hourly by clupilot:sync-stripe-subscriptions. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
5b63fdb86c |
Deliver the storage a customer actually buys
A booked storage pack was a row in `subscription_addons` and nothing else: priced, frozen, charged every month, and delivered nowhere. Nextcloud's quota came from `instances.quota_gb`, which is the package alone; the disk was sized for the package alone; and on the one occasion a disk did grow — a plan upgrade — the guest never saw it, because nothing stretched the partition or the filesystem over the new space. One authority for the allowance. StorageAllowance adds the package and the booked packs, and everything that needs the figure asks it: the quota step, the downgrade check, the portal, the console, the repair command. It is DERIVED rather than stored — a column would have to be rewritten by booking, cancelling, granting, a grant expiring and a plan change, and the day one of those paths forgot it would be silently wrong in whichever direction costs somebody money. `quota_applied_gb` keeps its own meaning: what the guest was last actually told, which is how a machine with the allowance enforced is told from one where the figure has only ever been a row in our database. Buying it delivers it. BookAddon asks ApplyStorageAllowance for a run on booking AND on cancellation; the new `storage` pipeline grows the virtual disk to the allowance plus the package's own overhead (read off the package — 20/40/50/100 GB on the four catalogue packages — never a ratio invented here), then GrowGuestFilesystem makes the guest see it, then the quota is applied. No cold boot is involved: the data disk is scsi0 and Proxmox's resize on a running guest is a qemu block_resize, so the capacity reaches the guest while it runs. The new step rescans, growparts and grows the filesystem with the tool its type actually needs — ext2/3/4, xfs, btrfs — and fails loudly on one it does not know rather than handing it to resize2fs and hoping. Idempotent end to end: NOCHANGE from growpart is not a failure, and every tool here exits 0 when there is nothing left to grow. The same step now runs in the plan-change pipeline, where an upgrade used to stop one step short of the customer. A downgrade blocked by data gets a way out. The block stays — it is correct — but the check now measures against the target package PLUS the packs the customer already owns, and reports the numbers behind the refusal: what is stored, what would be allowed, how much has to go, and how many packs would cover it instead. The portal offers both routes: book exactly those packs (confirmed in a modal, R23), or delete data and have the fill level measured on demand rather than waiting for the nightly sampler. That reading is taken by DiskUsageProbe, which CollectInstanceTraffic now uses too, so there is one notion of "how full is it" and not two. A plan change keeps booked packs. They were paid for separately and have nothing to do with which package the customer is on; the new package's disk and quota are sized with them included. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
8f2252e81b |
Book a downgrade for a date that cannot move, and sell a module once
Two ways of charging a customer for something they did not get. A downgrade was due when `subscriptions.current_period_end` said so, and Stripe pushes that column forward on every renewal. So a downgrade booked in March was deferred to the end of April by April's renewal, and to the end of May by May's — each time by a whole term, and each time the customer was billed again for the package they had asked to leave. The due date was being re-derived from a moving target on every scheduler tick. It is decided once now, at the moment the customer decides, and stamped onto the contract: `pending_plan` and `pending_effective_at`, the two columns that have been in the schema since the first migration and were written by nothing at all. The shop stamps them, PlanChange reads them instead of the period end when a move is already booked, and clupilot:apply-due-plan-changes finds contracts by the stamped date rather than orders by a date it recomputes. The order stays what it always was — the customer's own record of the request, what the cart shows them and what they remove to change their mind — so it is still consumed with the change, and removing it unbooks the change. What it no longer does is decide when. A second downgrade replaces the first rather than queueing behind it; an upgrade clears one, or it would come due months later and undo the bigger package; a contract cancelled before the date takes the booking with it; and a customer with no contract can no longer place a downgrade at all, which was accepted before and could never be carried out. A booked change is now visible where the contract is read: on the plan card in the portal, because the cart entry disappears when it is paid for and the booking does not, and on the customer row in the console, because that is where an operator answers "what is this customer on". The second defect is the same money in one step: BookAddon guarded duplicates per ORDER — the unique index on (order_id, addon_key) — so two orders for the same module on one contract both went through. A stale tab or a double click bought priority support twice. But storage is deliberately sold in packs, and AddonCatalogue sums the quantities for exactly that reason, so "refuse the second" is only right for some of them. Which is which is declared beside each price in config/provisioning.php (`sold_as`), because it is a commercial decision about each module and not something to infer from a key: storage is a quantity; off-site backups are on or off, support is prioritised or it is not, Collabora Pro is one licence, and a machine answers to one own domain. An undeclared module counts as an entitlement — the cheaper of the two mistakes — and a test refuses to let one ship undeclared. Enforced in the action, where the portal, the console's grant screen and a webhook all pass, with the sentence the customer is shown rather than a developer's. A retried webhook for the SAME order still gets its one booking back; that is one purchase arriving twice, not two purchases. The portal stops offering what would be refused — booked, or already waiting in the cart — and goes on offering the pack. What is missing is on the Stripe side and is not invented here: nothing moves the subscription's item onto the new Price, so the renewal after a plan change still bills the old plan at Stripe. StripeClient only creates and archives catalogue objects, and swapping a price also needs the subscription ITEM id, which nothing stores. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
34874adec3 |
Apply a bought plan change instead of only pricing it
tests / pest (push) Failing after 8m6s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 21s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
PlanChange could say what a move would cost and whether it was allowed, and that was all it could do. Billing::purchase() wrote an upgrade order and nothing ever consumed it: same snapshot, same machine, same quota. A customer could pay for a bigger package and receive nothing. ApplyPlanChange is now the single place a change lands — it moves the contract onto the target's current version, writes one register row, settles the custom domain, and starts a run that resizes the machine. Applying the same order twice is a no-op, enforced by a unique event key rather than by a check two callers could both pass. Two things a plan change must not do, and now does not. A disk is never shrunk — Proxmox cannot, so the QUOTA shrinks instead, which is what was sold anyway. And a live machine is never rebooted as a side effect: cores and RAM are written, and where they need a restart the instance says so where an operator and the customer can both see it. The storage allowance also joins the build pipeline. ApplyStorageQuota was written for plan changes and ran only there, so a brand-new customer still got no quota at all — quota_gb reached the instance row and stopped, and every package delivered the whole disk. The test guarding that pipeline only counted its steps, which is how a list missing the one step that makes a package's storage real stayed green for its whole life. It now names the step. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
b3651a14be |
Decide who may have their own domain, and decide it in one place
tests / pest (push) Failing after 9m46s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 21s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
The domain page shipped with no access control at all: the `custom_domain`
plan feature was checked nowhere in the codebase, and every customer on
every package could point a domain at their instance. This is the owner's
rule, built as one authority that everything else asks.
Start impossible — not bookable, not upgradable, not offered
Team optional, via the `custom_domain` module
Business included, because the plan version carries the feature
Enterprise included, likewise
App\Services\Billing\CustomDomainAccess answers all of it: may this
contract use one, may it book the module, why not in words a customer can
be shown, what a downgrade would do to a domain they have, and — after a
change lands — making the state match. Read against the FROZEN plan
version, never today's catalogue, so a feature added to a package later
cannot reach into a contract signed before it.
Which packages cannot have one at all is an explicit list in
config/provisioning.php, beside the module's price. The catalogue cannot
answer it: plan versions model what a package HAS, and nothing models what
a package may BUY. Both available proxies are dishonest — "the lowest tier
on sale" hands the right to a grandfathered Start customer the day the
owner stops selling Start or adds something cheaper below it, and reading
it off `branding` would sell a domain to anyone allowed to upload a logo.
The config comment says so.
Enforced where it can be enforced today:
- BookAddon refuses the module, with the sentence the customer is shown.
GrantAddon now writes its synthetic order inside the transaction, so a
refusal cannot leave a paid order for a module nobody got.
- The portal drops the card where it cannot be booked and shows it as
included where the package carries it — no price, no button.
- Billing::purchase() re-checks, because a hidden button is markup.
- DowngradeCheck reports the consequence beside the blockers, so the
customer reads it above the button rather than after it: losing the
domain (Team -> Start), or the choice (Business -> Team, where keeping
it means booking the module).
- PlanChange::settleCustomDomain() applies it once a change lands: the
module stops being charged for and the instance goes back to its
platform address. It clears the whole domain, not only the verified
flag — clupilot:verify-domains re-reads every row that still has a
domain and a token, and would switch it back on the next night.
- The price sheet's own-domain row now reads dash / optional + price /
included, from the same authority; the three cell states already
existed and the view is unchanged.
STILL TO APPLY, ONCE THIS AND THE CUSTOM-DOMAIN BRANCH MEET — one line at
the top of App\Livewire\CustomDomain::mount(), which belongs to the other
session and is deliberately untouched here:
abort_unless(app(\App\Services\Billing\CustomDomainAccess::class)->allowsCustomer($this->customer()), 403);
routes/web.php is left alone for the same reason. The mount() guard covers
the route and the component both; a middleware would only repeat it.
Follow-ups, named rather than built:
- Nothing applies a plan change anywhere yet, so settleCustomDomain()
has no caller. Whoever builds that must call it after the new contract
opens, and must decide whether a booked module is carried onto the new
contract — enforce() cancels the booking on the contract it is given.
- Deactivation sets the state; it does not re-run provisioning. Traefik
and Nextcloud's trusted_domains still name the old address until
ConfigureDnsAndTls / ConfigureNextcloud run again.
- App\Support\Navigation still shows the Domain tab to every customer;
it can ask allowsCustomer() the same way.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
|
|
d4e8822dbb |
Paketversionen: Verkauf wieder aufnehmen und saubere Übergabe
tests / pest (push) Failing after 7m58s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 20s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Eine geschlossene Version konnte nie wieder in den Verkauf. Schlimmer: um ein Paket zu ändern, musste die laufende Version zuerst beendet werden — und wenn die Nachfolgerin dann nicht sofort veröffentlicht wurde, war das Paket dauerhaft dunkel. - PlanCatalogue::reopen() setzt available_until zurück auf null, über schedule(), damit Family-Lock und Überlappungsprüfung dieselben bleiben. Ein nie veröffentlichter Entwurf wird abgelehnt. - PlanCatalogue::publish() übergibt eine laufende Version an ihre Nachfolgerin (available_until = deren Start) statt die Überlappung abzulehnen — unter demselben Lock, in derselben Transaktion. Nur die unmittelbare Vorgängerin, und nur wenn es genau eine gibt. - Konsole: Knopf „Wieder verkaufen", übersetzte Ablehnung statt der englischen Ausnahme, und die Übergabe wird im Veröffentlichen-Formular vorher angekündigt (Version und Zeitpunkt, ->local()). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
c71b2c362b |
Skip the invoice for a full gift, keep it out of revenue, hide its price
IssueInvoice now rejects free-grant orders before it will consume an invoice number for them — a full gift produces no invoice at all, while a discounted grant still charges something and is invoiced exactly like an ordinary sale. Keyed on the linked subscription/add-on's own provenance, not on the amount being zero, so a genuinely fully-discounted Stripe checkout is unaffected. Revenue excludes granted contracts from MRR/ARR/ARPU and the contracts count — a gift at 0 must not drag the average down — and shows their number as its own KPI instead of folding it in, since the owner measures himself on it. The portal (Cloud, Billing) shows a granted package or module without a price at all: not "free", not struck through, just the service, so a later conversion to paid does not read as a negotiation. |
|
|
|
602602864a |
Let a subscription or add-on be opened for free, with who and why on the row
A grant is an order without money, not a second code path: GrantSubscription and GrantAddon create the same Order/Subscription/SubscriptionAddon rows a paid purchase does, with stripe_subscription_id left null and price_cents set to whatever the customer actually pays. OpenSubscription and BookAddon gained an optional overrides parameter so the price and provenance (who granted it, when, a note, an optional end date, and the catalogue price for legibility) land on the same snapshot every real purchase goes through, not a duplicate. New customers.grant_plan capability, Owner-only like secrets.manage — giving away service is exactly the kind of blast radius that precedent reserves for the Owner. |
|
|
|
15b536f393 |
Mint the archive collection key from the console instead of by hand
tests / pest (push) Failing after 7m49s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 22s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Setting a NAS up to collect the invoice archive meant three machines and a dozen commands: generate a keypair there, carry the public half to the server, write it into authorized_keys with a restriction, install rsync, and get every path right on the first try. Every one of those steps was a place to be told "permission denied" with no clue which of the three was wrong. It was, and several times over. One button now. The panel asks, the host does it — because the host is where all of it lives: the home directory, ssh-keygen, rrsync, and the archive itself. The panel is www-data in a container and owns none of that, so it uses the mailbox it already uses for updates. The private half is shown exactly once, alongside the finished rsync command, and is never written to the database: it exists to be copied into a NAS, and storing it "for convenience" would put a working credential in every backup of that database. rrsync does the restricting, not a pinned rsync option string. That string differs between rsync versions and fails silently — a refusal with no reason given, which is the shape of the afternoon this replaces. If rrsync is missing the agent refuses rather than issuing an unrestricted key while the panel says it is restricted. rsync now comes with install-agent.sh, which already runs as root once per machine. It has to be on the HOST: a NAS connects by ssh and sshd starts `rsync --server` here, so without it the pull fails with "command not found" from a NAS whose own setup is perfectly correct. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
132be7fdd5 |
Leave the archive readable by whoever collects from it
tests / pest (push) Failing after 7m32s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 21s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Reported as "the folder arrives empty". It was not empty. The folder was 0700 and owned by the account that wrote it, so the account that COLLECTS — an rsync over ssh, a backup agent, anything that is not the writer — could not enter it, and an unreadable directory looks exactly like an empty one. The invoice had been sitting in it the whole time. The cause is that the default follows the process umask, so under a restrictive one 0755 quietly becomes 0700. The permissions are declared on the disk now rather than left to inherit, and a test writes under umask 0077 and asserts the mode — the ordinary umask hides this completely, which is why it was found on a server and not here. Two mistakes of mine on the way to it, both worth recording. I read the folder as the wrong user, got no entries back, and concluded the file had been deleted — it was a permission failure reading as an unprivileged account, not a missing file. And the first fix was a chmod on a variable that does not exist in that method, silenced by an @ so it failed without a word. Flysystem takes its permissions from configuration; a chmod afterwards was the wrong layer even before it was the wrong variable. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
d8ff717cb5 |
Let a destination say how it is laid out and how long anything stays
tests / pest (push) Failing after 7m29s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 23s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Two destinations doing two jobs. A handover directory a NAS collects from wants a folder per day and wants emptying — thirty days is enough to notice a NAS that stopped collecting, and keeping more only hides it. An archive on the NAS itself wants a folder per year and wants nothing deleted, ever. So both are per destination rather than global. Deleting is safe here in a way it usually is not, and that is worth saying plainly: the invoice is a frozen document in the database and its PDF is rendered from that on demand. Nothing is moved anywhere — it is copied, and anything removed from a directory can be produced again and re-exported. The directory is a handover point, not the record. keep_days is null by default and stays null unless somebody sets it: a retention rule nobody asked for is a deletion nobody expected. The prune only touches folders whose NAME is one of the two shapes this application writes, and leaves everything else alone — a prune that deletes what it does not recognise is how an archive loses something nobody was watching. It also skips a destination whose path is missing rather than acting on whatever is underneath an absent mountpoint. The shape is matched with a pattern before parsing rather than by handing nonsense to Carbon: under strict mode createFromFormat throws instead of returning false, so one folder somebody made by hand would have ended the whole prune instead of being skipped. The test with a foreign folder in it found that. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
f0ec2fe03f |
Keep the SFTP credential on the row it belongs to, encrypted
tests / pest (push) Failing after 7m22s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 20s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
The first version put it in the credential vault. The vault refuses it, and correctly: it keeps a registry of fixed, documented credentials so the Secrets page can describe each one, and a per-destination password is not that. Forcing a dynamic key into that registry would have made the registry meaningless. Encrypted onto the row with the same cipher instead — the same key, so it is no more readable in a database dump than anything the vault holds, and it lives with the record it describes. A rotated SECRETS_KEY now says so by name rather than surfacing as an authentication failure against a host that is perfectly fine. Also answers the question that prompted this: the host, port and user fields are there, and appear once SFTP is chosen. A mounted directory has no host on purpose — the mount is made on the server with mount(8), and the application only names the directory it writes into. A test asserts both halves, because "the fields are there, you just cannot see them yet" is not something anybody should have to take on trust. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
b3081a544b |
Let the export have as many destinations as somebody wants
tests / pest (push) Failing after 7m35s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 21s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
One path and one exported_at could not say "on the office NAS, not yet on the off-site box" — which is the only interesting question once there is more than one destination, and the reason for a second is precisely that any single one can fail. A row per destination now, and a row per (invoice, destination) pair. Two kinds, and the difference is where the protocol lives. 'local' is a directory this machine can already write to: a NAS mounted over NFS 4.1, a bind mount, a disk. The application knows nothing about the protocol, the target changes without code changing with it, and the whole thing stays testable against a temporary directory. 'sftp' is for something reachable with credentials — a Hetzner Storage Box being the obvious one — and the password goes into the secret vault with only its key on the row, because a credential in a settings table is a credential in every database dump. An empty password field on an existing target means unchanged, not cleared: the field cannot show what is stored, so blank-means-delete would wipe it on every unrelated edit. One job per pair rather than one per invoice. A job writing to both would retry the one that worked every time the other did not, and report one outcome for two different things. The ordering fix the tests found: Laravel's local adapter creates its root when it is CONSTRUCTED, so the "never create the root" guard was checking a directory the disk had just made for it. It runs before the disk is built now. That guard is the difference between an archive and a hole in the ground — mkdir on an absent mountpoint succeeds, writes onto the container's own disk and reports success, and an archive that silently is not the archive is worse than none. The single path from the previous commit is migrated into a destination called "Archiv" rather than dropped. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
ab4b0311d4 |
Copy every invoice to the archive when it is issued, and notice when that fails
tests / pest (push) Failing after 11m24s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 21s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
The application knows nothing about NFS and should not. It writes to a directory; whether that is a local disk, a bind mount or a NAS over NFS 4.1 belongs to the mount. No protocol library, the target changes without code changing with it, and the whole thing is testable against a temp directory. The finding that shaped it: mkdir -p on a path whose mount is NOT there succeeds. It creates the empty directory beneath the mountpoint, writes the invoice onto the container's own disk and reports success — so an unmounted NAS would quietly collect invoices locally while every check said it worked. An archive that silently is not the archive is worse than none. The root is therefore never created, only used: a missing root means a missing mount, and that is a failure. Only the year subdirectory is created, inside a root already proven to exist. Written to a .part and renamed. A rename within one filesystem is atomic, so whatever watches that folder never sees a truncated PDF and takes it for a finished invoice. The size is read back afterwards rather than the write being trusted: over a network mount a short write can report success, and an archive of truncated files looks exactly like one that worked. Queued, not done during the request. A network mount can block for its whole timeout, and an invoice must not fail to be issued because a NAS is rebooting. Dispatched after the commit, or a worker could look for an invoice that has not landed yet. And copy-on-issue is not enough on its own: an invoice issued while the office connection was down never arrives, the queue eventually gives up, and nobody opens an archive to check whether last Tuesday is in it. An hourly sweep re-queues whatever is still missing, the failure is recorded on the invoice rather than only in a log, and the Finance page says how many are outstanding. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
86bf4f26e0 |
List issued invoices in the console, with no way to change one
tests / pest (push) Failing after 7m34s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 22s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Read-only by design, and the absence is the feature: an issued invoice is corrected by cancelling it and issuing another, which is the only lawful way to correct one. There is no edit button here whose absence needs explaining, and a test asserts there is none. The PDF is a plain route rather than a Livewire action. A download is a download, and routing one through a component round-trip only adds a way for it to fail. Two findings on the way, and both were mine. The year filter used YEAR() in raw SQL, which is MySQL's. SQLite has no such function, so the page worked against the real database and threw against the test one — a query that only runs on one engine makes the test database a different product from the one being shipped. The years are derived in PHP now. And a test put a User on the operator guard, where EnsureAdmin calls isActive() on it and a 403 becomes a 500. Not a code defect: actingAs() calls Auth::shouldUse(), so a second actingAs() in the same test with no guard named lands on whichever guard the FIRST one named. That trap is written up in CLAUDE.md, I quoted it earlier today, and I walked into it anyway. The tests are split now and both name their guard. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
92bcdcd186 |
Send the invoice with the invoice attached
tests / pest (push) Failing after 7m32s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 22s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
The PDF is rendered when the mail goes out rather than fetched from anywhere, because nothing stores it — and rendering from the frozen snapshot means the attachment is the document as issued no matter when the queue gets to it or how often it retries. fromData rather than fromPath: there is no path. Three attempts at testing it, and the first two were wrong in ways worth recording. Attachment::$data does not exist — the closure lives in a protected $resolver, and reaching for it was me testing the framework's internals rather than my own code. And a byte comparison of the PDF cannot work at all: TCPDF embeds a creation time and a document id, so two renders of one invoice differ. Split into the two things that can actually go wrong. The mail carries an attachment with the right filename and type — that is metadata, and it is asserted as metadata. And the renderer produces a real PDF rather than an empty one, asserted where the renderer is, because an attachment closure that returns nothing still makes a perfectly valid mail with a nought-byte file on it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
cd54212b34 |
Issue an invoice from what somebody bought, and freeze it there
tests / pest (push) Failing after 7m32s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 25s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
One invoice per purchase rather than per order: a customer who buys a plan and two add-ons in one go has bought once, and three invoices for one purchase is three times the paperwork for the same money. Each order becomes a line, which is also how the add-ons get listed individually. Everything the document says is copied into the snapshot at the moment the number is assigned — issuer, recipient, lines, rate, the reason for the rate. A test changes the company name and the customer name afterwards and asserts the invoice still says what it said. That is the whole reason no PDF is stored. The number and the invoice commit in one transaction. A number taken and then lost to a failure is a gap in a series that must not have one, and the refusal test asserts that a rejected invoice leaves the counter where it was. It refuses outright until the company details are complete. An invoice without a registered name, an address or a VAT number is not a valid invoice here, and issuing one consumes a number that can never be handed out again. VAT comes from TaxTreatment, which already existed and already handles a verified EU VAT ID correctly — including the reverse-charge note, without which a zero-rated invoice says nothing about why no VAT was charged. The billing address is carried as the lines it was written as. It is one free-text field today, and guessing which line is the postcode would put it where the street belongs, on a document nobody can correct afterwards. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
3fb7e5f08c |
Decide the VAT rate in one place, before the two disagree
tests / pest (push) Failing after 7m48s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 26s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
The Finance tab wrote a rate into settings while TaxTreatment kept reading one from config — two sources for one number, added by me two commits ago. It had not bitten yet only because both happened to say 20. TaxTreatment now takes the domestic rate from CompanyProfile, which falls back to the .env-derived config until an operator saves one. Same shape as ProvisioningSettings, which already solves this for the deployment values, and the same reason: an operator can change a settings page and cannot change a config value, so a page that appears to set the rate and does not is worse than no page at all. Reverse charge and the seller country stay where they are. That logic already existed, already handles a verified EU VAT ID correctly, and nothing here needed to know about it — which is exactly why it should not have been duplicated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
4646880b90 |
Print every line at full price and take the discount off once, in euros
tests / pest (push) Failing after 7m40s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 22s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Second correction to the same block, and this one came from the right place: a line reading 202,50 beside "Rabatt 10 %" does not say whether the discount is in that number or still to come. It was unreadable, and unreadable on the one figure a customer checks. Lines are at full price now. Discounts are still entered per line — that is where they belong and where somebody decides them — but they are summed and shown once, in euros, under a subtotal that the "Gesamt netto" column adds up to. Subtotal, one subtraction, VAT, total: a sum anybody can follow without being told which figures are already adjusted. The gross line-total column is gone and a gross UNIT price takes its place. Full-price gross totals would sum to 315,60 against a total of 288,60 — the same contradiction in a different column. Nobody adds up unit prices, and a consumer reading this wants to know what one of the things costs. lineTotal() and adjustmentLabel() went with it. Nothing calls them any more, and a helper kept for a layout that no longer exists is the next person's wrong turn. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
d21e4f0eb2 |
Put a discount on the line it belongs to, so the columns add up
tests / pest (push) Failing after 8m5s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 21s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
With one discount applied under the table, the gross column summed to 315,60 against a total of 284,04. Nothing was miscalculated — the discount simply came after — but a reader who adds up a column found a document that does not agree with itself, and no way to tell which figure was the real one. On an invoice that is not a presentation detail. A discount or surcharge now sits on its line, percentage or fixed amount, and is inside that line's total. The label under the line is built from the same value that did the arithmetic, so the words cannot end up describing a different number than the one printed beside them. The invoice-wide adjustment stays in the arithmetic for anything that genuinely applies to the whole document, but nothing uses it by default. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
c1896e70fc |
Render an invoice, with the arithmetic held to integer cents
tests / pest (push) Failing after 7m9s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 24s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
TCPDF 6, deliberately, after installing 7 and finding out what it is. Version 7 is not a newer TCPDF; it is a compatibility shim over tc-lib-pdf whose own mapping table lists 115 of 293 methods as stubs, and whose font package ships no font files at all — the first render died on a missing helvetica.json. The 6.x line carries a hundred and sixty-five fonts, a working writeHTML and real header and footer hooks, and is what everybody means by TCPDF. The body is a Blade template handed to writeHTML rather than a hundred Cell() calls with millimetre coordinates, because this table has to be adjusted the first time somebody sees it on paper, and nobody adjusts the second kind. InvoiceMath is integer cents end to end, and rounds once. A percentage applied line by line and rounded each time drifts from the same percentage applied to the sum — three lines at 3,33 € less 10 % is 99 cents that way and 100 cents the honest way, and the customer's calculator is what finds it. Gross is always derived from net and never the reverse: taking VAT back out of a gross figure returns a different number often enough to matter. A discount and a surcharge are one operation with opposite signs, so nothing has to remember which of two flags means which. Quantities are thousandths, because hours, gigabytes and part-months are all real, and are printed with the trailing zeroes stripped — "12,000 Std." reads as a defect. Every line shows quantity, unit price net, total net AND total gross: this goes to businesses and to consumers, and each reads a different column first. Verifying it took two goes and both failures were mine. `strings` over a PDF set in a Unicode font finds nothing, because the text is stored as subset glyph ids — the check has to render in a core font to be a check at all. And two of the strings I then declared missing were simply expectations I had got wrong. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
e6d2e6dc33 |
Give the console a Finance tab: company details, VAT rate, invoice series
tests / pest (push) Failing after 7m49s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 22s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Its own tab rather than a section of Settings, as asked. What is set here appears on a legal document, and burying it beside the site-visibility switch invites somebody to change one in passing. Everything the printed invoice needs — registered name, address, Firmenbuch number and court, VAT ID, bank details, payment terms, logo — with the logo replaceable, because a company changes its mark. None of it reaches an invoice that already exists: the values are copied into each document when its number is assigned, so a corrected address is correct from the next one onwards and cannot rewrite an old one. The console refuses to consider itself ready while a name, an address or a VAT number is missing, and says which. An invoice without them is not a valid invoice in Austria, and issuing one is worse than refusing to. The series editor carries the same shape as EditDatacenter and for the same reason. The prefix is free while the series is empty and frozen once a document carries it: changing RE to AR renames nothing and leaves a series whose past says RE and whose future says AR, with no record they belong together. The counter may be raised — an operator migrating from another system needs exactly that — but never lowered, because a lower number is one already printed on a document somebody holds. Both rules are recomputed from the database on save rather than read back from the properties the browser returns. CompanyProfile drops keys that are not part of the profile. It is fed from a form, and a forged key must not be able to write an arbitrary setting into the same table the site-visibility switch lives in. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
735daf46a4 |
Lay the foundation for self-issued invoices: series, numbers, frozen documents
tests / pest (push) Failing after 7m49s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 21s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
An invoice is a tax document, so two things drive the shape of this. It is frozen at issue. Everything the finished document says — issuer address, VAT number, bank details, customer address, every line, the rate, the totals — is copied into the invoice row when the number is assigned. The PDF is rendered from that and never stored, which is what was asked for; rendering it from today's settings instead would have been simpler and wrong, because an address changed in 2028 would rewrite an invoice from 2026. The width of this table IS the feature. Numbers are gapless and ascending, which is a legal requirement rather than a preference, and that is why none of it is derived from the invoices table. "Highest number plus one" hands the same number to two sales that land together and hands a used number back out after a row is removed — a number already printed on a document somebody holds. The counter is a column, read and advanced under a row lock inside the caller's transaction, and taking one outside a transaction throws rather than quietly working. Four Rechnungskreise seeded — Rechnung, Gutschrift, Storno, Anzahlung — each with its own prefix and its own counter, because a credit note is not an invoice with a minus sign in front of it. Seeded rather than left to the operator: an installation with no series cannot issue anything, and discovering that at the first sale is the worst possible moment. TCPDF added, for the renderer that comes next. There is deliberately no test for the outside-a-transaction guard, and a note where it would have been: RefreshDatabase opens a transaction around every test, so the guard cannot fire and a green test for it would be green for a reason that has nothing to do with the guard. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
8c3a79e258 |
fix(billing): hold only what cannot be matched, and let migrations roll back
Two findings from reviewing all five phases together rather than one at a time. The webhook held every event a handler answered `null` to — but `null` also means "already recorded" and "deliberately skipped", which is every checkout's own invoice and every redelivered renewal. Their contract is right there, so `replayHeldFor()` could never come back for them, and ordinary Stripe traffic silted up the holding area until the weekly prune. It now holds only what it genuinely cannot match — and if the contract appeared in the meantime, applies the event instead of dropping it: the creation race is narrow, but losing a cancellation to it would leave us serving someone who had left. Also fixes a rollback that predates this work and blocks `migrate:fresh` on MariaDB entirely: dropping the unique index on customers.user_id fails while the foreign key added one migration earlier still depends on it. Verified by building all 33 migrations from nothing on MariaDB, rolling every one of them back, and building them again. 458 tests green. Codex clean on the full branch diff. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
0560ae743d |
feat(billing): Stripe owns the billing cycle, we own capability
A Product per plan family and a Price per priced row of a published version, plus the four subscribed webhook events that were arriving and being ignored. `stripe:sync-catalogue` mirrors the catalogue. Idempotent twice over: a stored id is skipped, and each call carries an idempotency key derived from our own row, so a crash between Stripe creating a Price and us recording its id gives back the same object rather than a second one. That matters more here than usual — a Stripe Price cannot be edited or deleted, so a duplicate is permanent. Drafts are not synced at all: a version that has promised nothing has no business in a price list. --dry-run shows what would be created. The webhook now handles invoice.paid, invoice.payment_failed, customer.subscription.updated and customer.subscription.deleted. It never re-derives an amount: the invoice is the authority for what was charged, and recomputing it from our catalogue would produce a second, disagreeing answer. A failed payment is recorded and nothing else — Stripe runs the dunning schedule, and cutting a customer off on the first failure would punish an expired card as though it were a refusal to pay. Only a cycle renewal moves the term on. Stripe also sends paid invoices for prorations and manual charges, and the checkout's own invoice — which is already in the register as the purchase, and would otherwise double every customer's first payment. Stripe does not guarantee delivery order, which is the source of most of the care here: - state changes are judged and written in one transaction with the row held, so two deliveries cannot both pass a check made on a stale copy; - an older event never overwrites a newer one, with a rank breaking ties between events sharing a second — their timestamps have one-second resolution, and a failed attempt and its successful retry routinely do; - a term is never shortened, and an ended contract is never revived; - an event for a contract that does not exist yet is HELD and replayed the moment it appears, rather than acknowledged and forgotten. A cancellation dropped that way would leave us serving someone who had already left. Held rows that never match are pruned after a week. Register entries are keyed by what they are about — the invoice, the attempt, the subscription — with a unique index doing the work, because a check two concurrent deliveries can both pass is not idempotency. PlanChange is now documented as the preview shown before someone confirms, not the invoice: Stripe's proration accounts for tax, existing credit and the exact second the change lands, and ours cannot. Not run against the live account — `stripe:sync-catalogue` creates objects that cannot be deleted, so that is the owner's call. The dry run lists 12. 457 tests green. Codex review clean after seven rounds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
7582df3de6 |
feat(billing): a proof register, and modules frozen at their booked price
Two things the contract could not answer on its own: what happened, and what the customer's whole bill is. `subscription_records` is append-only, one row per commercial event. Flat columns for everything searched or relied on as evidence — event, customer, subscription, plan family and version, term, net/tax/gross, currency, tax rate, reverse charge, Stripe ids — PLUS a versioned JSON copy of the whole snapshot. Not JSON alone: you cannot query it, and "the amount is in there somewhere" is poor evidence. Copied, not joined, so a row still answers after the customer, the plan or the version have gone. The flat columns describe the TRANSACTION. Gross is what was actually taken; net and tax are that gross split by the rate that applied on the day. A discount lowers the taxable amount rather than creating negative VAT, and a free checkout is recorded as free instead of as paid in full. What was agreed sits beside it in the snapshot, so a charge that differs from the catalogue is preserved as a question rather than reconciled away. The register refuses to be rewritten, in bulk as well as one row at a time — model events do not fire for `query()->update()`, which is exactly the shape a careless data fix takes. `subscription_addons` carries the owner's rule: a customer's total is their subscription plus their modules, and all of it is frozen at what was agreed. Price protection covering only the plan would let a module quietly double for someone who booked it two years ago. A module they have NOT booked is a sale still to be made, at today's price — so the catalogue is consulted only for what is not in this table. Several bookings of one module are summed rather than reduced to one arbitrary row, or the page and the bill would disagree. Concurrency: one order books one module, enforced by a unique index rather than a lookup two retries can both pass; cancellation is an atomic claim; and each booking commits with its own register entry, so a failure cannot leave a sale without evidence and a retry that finds the booking cannot skip the event. Verified in the browser: with the module raised from 29,00 € to 59,00 € in the catalogue, the customer who booked it still sees 29,00 € and a total of 208,00 €, while a new customer is quoted 59,00 €. 436 tests green. Codex review clean after seven rounds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
f6ddf45dc0 |
feat(admin): a console for creating, pricing and scheduling plans
The owner can now do from the console what only a config edit could do before: create a plan line, draft a version, price it, publish it into a window, and pull a plan out of the shop. Two pages and one modal, because the catalogue has exactly two levels. The plan list is a name, a rank and a kill switch. Everything that can be got wrong — capabilities, prices, windows — lives on the versions, where the page is built around the one rule that matters: a draft is freely editable, a published version is not touchable at all. So drafting and publishing are separate acts, and publishing says plainly that it is final. The console refuses everything the catalogue refuses, on the form rather than as a stack trace: an overlapping window, a window that ends before it starts, a version with no price for a term we sell on, and — new here — a version with no VM template, which would be bought and then fail provisioning every time. Numbers are bounded on both sides, because a mistyped price otherwise overflows the column and answers with a 500 instead of saying which field was wrong. Performance class and features are picked from the keys we have labels for; free text would be frozen at publication and shown to customers as a raw translation key forever. Concurrency, since two admins share one catalogue: draft numbers are allocated under a lock on the family, publication is an atomic conditional claim, and discarding a draft is one statement conditional on it still being a draft — otherwise a draft published in the meantime could be deleted out from under the customers now contracted to it. `plans.manage` (Owner and Admin) guards the pages themselves, not only the buttons, and the modal authorises itself — prices, drafts and unreleased plans are not something to leave readable to anyone who types the URL. Also fixes the shared checkbox, which ticked in the browser's own blue on every page that used one: a native checkbox ignores text colour and needs accent-color. Verified in the browser: withdrawing a plan in the console removes it from the customer's billing page immediately, and restoring it brings it back. The public landing page carries no catalogue-driven plan list, so there is nothing there to hide. 421 tests green. Codex review clean after six rounds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
6387c747d0 |
feat(billing): the plan catalogue becomes three tables, and config stops selling
Plans lived in config/provisioning.php, where the owner cannot reach them and
where a plan has no history. They now live in plan_families / plan_versions /
plan_prices — a name that never moves, what the plan WAS at a point in time,
and a price per version and term with its own Stripe Price id.
- Availability is computed on every read (available_from <= now < until,
half-open, UTC) plus a per-family sales kill switch. Nothing schedules a plan
into or out of sale: a job that fails to run is a plan that silently
misbehaves.
- Overlaps crash rather than resolve. currentVersion() uses sole(), and
scheduling takes a lock on the family and rejects an overlapping window —
two versions on sale at once would decide a customer's price by row order.
- A version is frozen from publication, not from first sale, and so is its
price: a checkout is not instant, and an amount edited between the session
opening and the webhook landing would contract someone at a price they were
never quoted. Repricing publishes a new version, as Stripe requires anyway.
- Neither a published version, its price, nor a family with customers can be
deleted, and a family key cannot be renamed. All of those would null the
provenance off existing contracts.
- Subscriptions and orders record plan_version_id. A historical reference
resolved by plan NAME hands back today's terms, which is the split-brain one
level up. A checkout that carried its version is honoured even after the
window closes — they paid for what they were shown.
Switched atomically and failing closed: config('provisioning.plans') and
plan_features are gone, and nothing falls back to them. A fallback would
resurrect a plan the owner had just switched off. The seed lives in the
migration, and PlanCatalogueTest pins what the config catalogue sold as the
shadow comparison. `php artisan plans:check` reports overlaps, gaps and
missing prices before a customer finds them.
Contract-backed displays, which were reading the live catalogue:
seat limits, the cloud card, the plan card, and admin MRR — the last three now
divide a yearly contract down via Subscription::monthlyPriceCents(), since all
three label the figure per month.
Two recovery gaps closed along the way: the order now commits before the
contract is opened (so a contract failure can never erase the record of a
payment), a Stripe retry repairs a missing contract and restarts a run stranded
with no_subscription, and TickProvisioning sweeps runs left pending by a crash
rather than only running/waiting ones.
402 tests green. Codex review clean after thirteen rounds. Verified in the
browser: portal, billing and console render unchanged off the new catalogue.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
|
|
6119044669 |
fix(billing): no plan changes after cancellation, no unknown terms
tests / pest (push) Successful in 6m46s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 19s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
A cancelled subscription still reported an upgrade as allowed and priced it, so a caller trusting that would have provisioned and billed a customer who had already left. And any term string other than the two we support was silently priced monthly while keeping the unknown value — a subscription whose price and billing period disagree. Both are refused now. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
35324b986a |
fix(billing): no free upgrade in the last hours of a term
tests / pest (push) Successful in 6m48s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 19s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Flooring the remaining time made an upgrade with under a day left cost nothing, and an upgrade requested after the period had ended cost nothing while being applied immediately — the bigger plan for free. Remaining time now rounds up while any service is left, and an expired period defers the change to the next term instead of pricing it at zero. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
52b1acbb80 |
fix(billing): a scheduled downgrade must be applicable, and never cost money
tests / pest (push) Successful in 6m49s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 19s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Once the term is over, the downgrade has to be allowed — otherwise the job that is supposed to carry it out never can, and the change waits forever for a date that has already passed. And a grandfathered plan can be cheaper than the smaller plan costs today, which made the goodwill credit negative: an invoice for the privilege of downgrading. Clamped to zero. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
460fac01b1 |
fix(billing): upgrade or downgrade is decided by rank, not by price
tests / pest (push) Successful in 6m51s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 20s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
With grandfathered prices the comparison inverts: a business plan bought when it cost less than today's team plan would have treated a move to team as an upgrade — charged immediately, while the customer loses resources. The plan's rank is frozen with the rest of the snapshot and decides the direction; prices only decide the amount. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
ac250071cb |
feat(billing): immutable subscription snapshots and pro-rata plan changes
The plan catalogue describes what we sell today; a customer who signed up last year bought last year's terms. Every commercially relevant condition — price, quotas, seats, the hardware behind the plan — is now frozen onto a subscription at signup, and the model refuses to let any of it be rewritten afterwards. A price rise applies to new subscriptions and cannot reach back into an existing contract. PlanChange holds the two rules, computed against the frozen price rather than today's catalogue: - Upgrading is immediate and pro rata: the new plan for the days left in the paid term, minus what the old plan was worth over those same days. On the last day of a month that is one day's difference, not a month's. - Downgrading waits for the end of the term. A yearly customer bought a year and can move down when it is up; a month is a month. A mid-term downgrade is a goodwill decision, not a self-service button, and its credit covers only the unused part of the difference. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |