3 Commits (v1.3.47)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
nexxo	8440266ed3	Stop charging for a service that has ended ... Nothing in this application could cancel a Stripe subscription — there was no such method on the client at all. So a customer who cancelled and a consumer who withdrew both stayed subscribed, the card went on being charged every month, and every one of those payments arrived as invoice.paid, drew a real number out of the gapless Austrian series and mailed the PDF, for a machine that had been switched off. Indefinitely. StripeClient::cancelSubscription() closes the first half, with the timing passed explicitly at the call site — CANCEL_AT_PERIOD_END for a cancellation, because the customer keeps the term they paid for, and CANCEL_IMMEDIATELY for a withdrawal, because that unwinds the contract and the whole amount has just gone back. The immediate form states prorate and invoice_now as false rather than inheriting them: a credit note of Stripe's beside our own Storno would be the same money twice. The second half is ApplyStripeBillingEvent::owesADocument(). Refusing every invoice on a cancelled contract would lose the legitimate final one — the cycle for a term the customer really did use, unpaid, dunned for three weeks and settled after the contract ended. So the question is not when the payment landed but what it is for: an invoice whose billed period STARTED before the contract ended is documented, one whose period begins at or after that moment is not. Neither is a contract marked cancelled with no date, nor an invoice with no period, because a number handed out in error can never be withdrawn while a missing document can still be issued. The register entry is written either way — the money moved, and that is where an operator finds what has to go back. A cancellation also took its date from the order date plus MONTHS, whatever the term said, so a yearly customer who cancelled in March lost the nine months they had already paid for. It reads current_period_end now, which Stripe keeps current for both terms; the month-walk survives only for a machine with no contract behind it, where nothing records a term at all. Stripe is asked first and our rows are written only if it agreed: a cancellation we could not make effective is the defect above wearing a "gekündigt" label on the settings page, and a cancellation has no deadline, so being asked to try again costs nobody anything. A withdrawal cancelled the OPENING invoice only, found by invoices.order_id — which a renewal and a module document leave null on purpose. A storage pack booked on day three and withdrawn from on day ten was therefore neither cancelled nor refunded. Every charge inside the window is covered now, one Storno per document and one refund per payment, each against the payment that actually took it: a single refund of the total against the opening PaymentIntent is what Stripe would have refused for exceeding it, and one idempotency key for the whole withdrawal would have had Stripe replay the first refund's answer for the second. StartCustomerProvisioning::resume() opened a missing contract and returned, and the only production call to IssueInvoice::forOrders() is after the order commits — so a worker killed in between cost that customer their invoice for good, silently, with nothing anywhere sweeping for it. resume() finishes that work too, guarded by the invoice already filed against the order and by invoices.sent_at, so however often Stripe redelivers it comes out as one invoice, one number, one mail. The order confirmation stays on the first pass alone: it has nothing to stamp. subscriptions.cancel_requested_at is new because the billing half of the application had no way to tell a cancelled contract from an untouched one. Deliberately not a status: until the term runs out this is a paying customer, which is the distinction EndInstanceService is built around, and `cancelled_at` beside it still means the day it genuinely ended. clupilot:verify-vat-ids is scheduled monthly on the first, and its docblock no longer points at a note in routes/console.php that never existed. Reverse charge rested on a one-off VIES answer, a withdrawn registration keeps earning rate 0 for ever, and the unpaid VAT on those invoices is the seller's — so the cadence is the width of that window, and the first of the month is the rhythm the return is filed on. Two tests that proved nothing are now about behaviour. SettingsTest asserted service_ends_at was not null, a column the code had just written and which the broken monthly arithmetic satisfied exactly as well as the right answer; it states the yearly date, the contract's own record and the order to Stripe. EndInstanceServiceTest travelled to whatever value the implementation had computed, so it recomputed the code instead of checking it, and never looked at billing at all; the boundary is a literal date now and the money stopping is asserted beside the address coming down. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 00:52:19 +02:00
nexxo	f02e86769b	Charge the price the website shows, and hand a withdrawal back in full ... Stripe was charging the catalogue's NET figure while the document added the domestic rate on top: a customer quoted 214,80 paid 179,00 and was then invoiced for VAT nobody had collected. Under para 11(12) UStG that VAT is owed to the tax office whether or not it ever arrived, so every document issued created a liability against revenue that did not contain it. The Stripe Price now carries the GROSS figure. price_cents stays net - it is frozen onto every contract and PlanChange prorates against it, so redefining it would corrupt every pro-rata sum ever computed. Only the amount at the till moved, and it is formed by the one call TaxTreatment already answers for the price sheet and for the invoice, so displayed, charged and invoiced cannot drift apart. Stripe's automatic_tax is deliberately not used. TaxTreatment is the single tax authority here, and a second rate computed by Stripe would take 19 % from a German consumer while our document said 20 %. A Stripe Price cannot be edited, so a changed figure means a new Price and the old one archived - which stops it being SOLD and leaves every subscription already on it billing the old amount for ever. stripe:reprice-subscriptions is the second half, and a command of its own because it touches live money. A withdrawing consumer is refunded in full, as the owner decided. That is more generous than FAGG para 16 requires, and it makes the express-request consent the statute hinges on irrelevant - so the gate is gone rather than left looking load-bearing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 22:42:02 +02:00
nexxo	6d7c2bdf35	Ask whether they are a consumer, and let one change their mind ... Three things the product owed its customers and did not have. **Who is on the other side.** There was no consumer/business flag anywhere, and `vat_id` was standing in for one — which it cannot: a business without a VAT number is an ordinary small business, and a consumer with one does not exist. It is asked at sign-up now, correctable in the portal, and NULL where nobody has been asked. Unknown is read as CONSUMER everywhere it decides a right, because that mistake costs us a refund while the other one takes a statutory right away from somebody who has it. Reverse charge asks the recorded type instead of the number: an explicit consumer is charged the domestic rate whatever `vat_id` says — previously they were not, and anyone could zero their own VAT by getting a number verified. An unrecorded type still falls back to the verified number, so no contract that is already running changes rate. **The fourteen-day right of withdrawal** (FAGG, §312g BGB), for consumers only, at every door: the window is stamped on the contract when it is concluded, the customer exercises it from the portal, an operator records one that arrived by telephone or post, and both go through one action that refuses a business customer on the server rather than by hiding a card. The money follows the paperwork rather than being computed beside it. The invoice is cancelled by a Storno with its own gapless number — nothing is ever edited or deleted — a new invoice states the pro-rata value of the service actually delivered (FAGG §16, by days over the term paid for), and the refund is exactly the difference between the two documents. Where the consumer never expressly asked for the service to begin at once, they owe nothing and the whole amount goes back. `StripeClient::refund()` is new, keyed so a retry cannot send the money twice. The service ends through EndInstanceService and the `cancellation_scheduled` machinery that was already there. **The cancel button for modules.** BookAddon::cancelAtPeriodEnd() had no caller in the interface at all, so a customer could book a recurring charge in two clicks and had no way to stop it. It is on the module card now, with the date it runs until and a way back while the cancellation is still pending — and putting a module back settles nothing, because the term it was cancelled for was paid for in advance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 21:06:06 +02:00