11 Commits (v1.3.63)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
nexxo	5883989552	Give settings the shape a settings page actually has ... Four attempts, and this is what was wrong with the last one: full-width panels stacked down the page, each carrying its own title INSIDE it. Every group had two frames — the title bar and the border — so the page read as a column of long boxes with nothing saying where one topic ended and the next began, and a phone number got a field a thousand pixels wide. The shape now: - **A section list on the left**, sticky, so the sections stay reachable however far a form runs. Below `lg` it becomes a scrolling strip of chips, because a vertical list on a telephone is four rows of nothing. Under it, who is signed in — on a shared office machine that is a real question, and a settings page is where it gets asked. - **A content column of 820px**, not the whole 1240 shell. - **The heading OUTSIDE the card it belongs to.** A section is a heading, a sentence, and then a card of rows. That single move is what stops them reading as boxes: the border now frames the fields, not the topic. - **What cannot be undone is last, in a card whose border says so** — the deletion deadlines and the close button together, at the foot of the contract section, in danger colours. The rows are unchanged (label left, control right) and so is every binding; what changed is the frame around them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 17:59:16 +02:00
nexxo	2a97d76b2d	Rebuild the settings page out of panels and rows ... **The withdrawal was invisible in two different ways.** It rendered only while the fourteen days were still running, so the moment they expired the whole block vanished — indistinguishable from a feature nobody built. And the account it was looked for on has no contract at all: no package, no subscription, nothing to withdraw from, so there was never anything for it to be about. It is now a row for every CONSUMER who has a contract, open or not: while it runs, the deadline and the button; afterwards, the sentence saying why it is over. A business never sees it — WithdrawalRight answers that, and Settings::withdraw() refuses them again on the server. And an account with no package says so and offers the packages, instead of a dead sentence in a box. **The page is built out of two pieces now.** x-ui.panel is a group: a card with a header that names it. x-ui.row is a setting inside it: what it is on the left, the control on the right, dividers between rows. That is the shape every settings page worth copying uses, and it is the shape that uses the width — a 280px label column with the control beside it fills the line, where a stack of full-width inputs leaves two thirds of it empty and a grid of cards of different heights walks down the screen as a staircase. All four tabs are rebuilt on it, so the page reads as one designed thing rather than four pages that happen to share a tab bar. Below `sm` the rows stack, because on a telephone a label belongs above its field. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 17:38:57 +02:00
nexxo	1056dddc62	Take the address by field, fix the customer type, ask why they leave ... **The billing address was one textarea**, so what landed in it was whatever somebody typed: a postcode on the street line, a city with no postcode, no country at all. It is four fields now — street, postcode, town, country — in the customer's settings and in the console's customer editor, which had its own free-text copy of the same field and would have had an operator's correction silently reverted the next time the customer saved. `customers.billing_address` is neither dropped nor parsed: guessing which line of an existing block is the street would put a postcode where a street belongs on a document nobody can correct afterwards. It becomes the COMPOSED form, rewritten from the fields on every save, so IssueInvoice and everything else that reads it keep working, and a record nobody has re-saved keeps the block it always had. **The customer type is fixed once it is on record.** It decides the fourteen-day right of withdrawal, and a business able to set itself to "Privatperson" on this page is a business able to withdraw from a contract it may not withdraw from. Registration asks the question; this page reports the answer, and saveProfile refuses to answer it a second time — in the component, not by hiding a radio, because a form that hides a control has never stopped anybody who can post to /livewire/update. A record created before the question existed may still be given one, once. The panel is a fact rather than a form now, which is also what was odd about it, and the sentence about who has the right of withdrawal is gone. **Cancelling asks why.** A reason from a fixed list, required, with a note beside it that "Sonstiges" cannot go without — the one fact worth having about a departure, asked at the only moment the customer is looking at the question. It lands on the contract (`cancel_reason`, `cancel_reason_note`). And where the fourteen days are still running, the dialogue offers the WITHDRAWAL as a way out of itself rather than as one more reason inside it: withdrawing ends the service the same day and sends the whole amount back, cancelling keeps the term that was paid for, and somebody entitled to the first should not lose it by taking the second unasked. A business is never offered it — WithdrawalRight answers that, not the template. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 16:41:32 +02:00
nexxo	1d4e98eb06	Rebuild the customer's settings page as four tabs ... It was one column 768 pixels wide inside a 1240-pixel shell — a third of the window empty beside it — holding everything a customer might ever change: the company address, their password, two-factor, the devices they are signed in on, the branding of their cloud, the contract, and the button that closes the account. Two thousand pixels of scroll, and the way to a particular thing was knowing how far down it lived. Four tabs, by what somebody came to do: their details, security, the appearance of their cloud, the contract. The same tab bar the console uses, so one vocabulary holds on both sides of the login, and the choice lives in the query string — `#[Url(history: true)]`, no `except`, so the parameter is there from the first render and a link to this page can name the part it means. An unknown tab out of the address falls back to the first rather than rendering a settings page with no section on it. The width is used now. Inside a tab the short cards sit side by side instead of each taking a full row to hold three lines: the customer type beside the company form (it is one question, and beside the VAT field it was mistaken for it), the password beside two-factor, the logo beside the colours, the contract beside the closing of the account. Also: the subtitle listed the old sections by name. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 16:25:10 +02:00
nexxo	fed4acf31c	Accept terms instead of a start date, and fix the sender no server accepts ... **The test mail was rejected: "553 5.7.1 Sender address rejected: not owned by user no-reply@…".** Every purpose mailbox here has its own SMTP account, and a mail server lets an account send only from the address it owns. Mail::to() hands back a pending mail bound to the DEFAULT mailer and sendNow() then ignores the mailer the mailable asked for, so a mail addressed support@ went out over the no-reply@ login. It sends through the mailable's own mailer now, and the cloud-ready preview — the one mailable with no mailbox at all — takes the provisioning mailbox like the real notification does. Writing the test for that found the same bug in production code: **InvoiceMail and OrderConfirmationMail set their From to billing@ and never named a mailer**, so both went out over mail.default's no-reply@ login. On this installation no customer had ever received an invoice mail or an order confirmation; they rendered perfectly, queued without complaint and were refused at the door. MailSenderOwnershipTest now scans for the mismatch: a mail that takes a mailbox From must use that mailbox's mailer. **The box on the order page accepts the terms now**, not an immediate start. It used to carry the whole FAGG §16 sentence, which read like a choice between "now" and "in fourteen days" — and there is no second option. The terms are what regulate the sale, so they had to exist: resources/views/legal/terms.blade.php replaces the placeholder with fourteen sections written from what this software actually does — the delivery, the capacity queue, the full refund on withdrawal, the cancellation at period end, the deletion deadlines. The company data comes from CompanyProfile, so the page and the invoices cannot drift. No availability figure and no liability cap has been invented. No order goes through without it: the button is unusable until the box is ticked and says why, and CheckoutController still refuses server-side — the browser half refuses nothing. The request field is `terms_accepted`; the Stripe metadata key stays `immediate_start`, because a session opened before a deploy is paid after it and the webhook would find nothing under a new name. **"Wird der Account nach fünf Tagen gelöscht?"** Only an unconfirmed one. That was the whole of what we said, so the answer looked like yes. The second rule now exists and is stated: PruneDormantAccounts removes a confirmed account after a year when it never had a package — no customer record at all, which is where every order, contract and seven-year invoice hangs. A fortnight's notice goes out first, once, and `dormant_warned_at` is what permits the deletion: an account whose warning never went out is never removed. Signing in resets the clock, measured off the device rows because users has no last_login_at. Both deadlines are said in the portal settings, on the verification page, and in the terms — each reading the number off the command that enforces it. Also: the wordmark scan matched any element whose text merely BEGINS with the company name, which a paragraph of terms does. It looks for the lockup form now (no whitespace after the tag), which is what it was always about. The seven checkout tests in the parallel session's files were posting the old field name and now post the new one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 15:22:35 +02:00
nexxo	8440266ed3	Stop charging for a service that has ended ... Nothing in this application could cancel a Stripe subscription — there was no such method on the client at all. So a customer who cancelled and a consumer who withdrew both stayed subscribed, the card went on being charged every month, and every one of those payments arrived as invoice.paid, drew a real number out of the gapless Austrian series and mailed the PDF, for a machine that had been switched off. Indefinitely. StripeClient::cancelSubscription() closes the first half, with the timing passed explicitly at the call site — CANCEL_AT_PERIOD_END for a cancellation, because the customer keeps the term they paid for, and CANCEL_IMMEDIATELY for a withdrawal, because that unwinds the contract and the whole amount has just gone back. The immediate form states prorate and invoice_now as false rather than inheriting them: a credit note of Stripe's beside our own Storno would be the same money twice. The second half is ApplyStripeBillingEvent::owesADocument(). Refusing every invoice on a cancelled contract would lose the legitimate final one — the cycle for a term the customer really did use, unpaid, dunned for three weeks and settled after the contract ended. So the question is not when the payment landed but what it is for: an invoice whose billed period STARTED before the contract ended is documented, one whose period begins at or after that moment is not. Neither is a contract marked cancelled with no date, nor an invoice with no period, because a number handed out in error can never be withdrawn while a missing document can still be issued. The register entry is written either way — the money moved, and that is where an operator finds what has to go back. A cancellation also took its date from the order date plus MONTHS, whatever the term said, so a yearly customer who cancelled in March lost the nine months they had already paid for. It reads current_period_end now, which Stripe keeps current for both terms; the month-walk survives only for a machine with no contract behind it, where nothing records a term at all. Stripe is asked first and our rows are written only if it agreed: a cancellation we could not make effective is the defect above wearing a "gekündigt" label on the settings page, and a cancellation has no deadline, so being asked to try again costs nobody anything. A withdrawal cancelled the OPENING invoice only, found by invoices.order_id — which a renewal and a module document leave null on purpose. A storage pack booked on day three and withdrawn from on day ten was therefore neither cancelled nor refunded. Every charge inside the window is covered now, one Storno per document and one refund per payment, each against the payment that actually took it: a single refund of the total against the opening PaymentIntent is what Stripe would have refused for exceeding it, and one idempotency key for the whole withdrawal would have had Stripe replay the first refund's answer for the second. StartCustomerProvisioning::resume() opened a missing contract and returned, and the only production call to IssueInvoice::forOrders() is after the order commits — so a worker killed in between cost that customer their invoice for good, silently, with nothing anywhere sweeping for it. resume() finishes that work too, guarded by the invoice already filed against the order and by invoices.sent_at, so however often Stripe redelivers it comes out as one invoice, one number, one mail. The order confirmation stays on the first pass alone: it has nothing to stamp. subscriptions.cancel_requested_at is new because the billing half of the application had no way to tell a cancelled contract from an untouched one. Deliberately not a status: until the term runs out this is a paying customer, which is the distinction EndInstanceService is built around, and `cancelled_at` beside it still means the day it genuinely ended. clupilot:verify-vat-ids is scheduled monthly on the first, and its docblock no longer points at a note in routes/console.php that never existed. Reverse charge rested on a one-off VIES answer, a withdrawn registration keeps earning rate 0 for ever, and the unpaid VAT on those invoices is the seller's — so the cadence is the width of that window, and the first of the month is the rhythm the return is filed on. Two tests that proved nothing are now about behaviour. SettingsTest asserted service_ends_at was not null, a column the code had just written and which the broken monthly arithmetic satisfied exactly as well as the right answer; it states the yearly date, the contract's own record and the order to Stripe. EndInstanceServiceTest travelled to whatever value the implementation had computed, so it recomputed the code instead of checking it, and never looked at billing at all; the boundary is a literal date now and the money stopping is asserted beside the address coming down. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 00:52:19 +02:00
nexxo	2277dfe4cb	Ask the EU register whether a VAT number is real ... vat_id_verified_at was declared on the customer and read by TaxTreatment, and set by no code anywhere. hasVerifiedVatId() therefore never returned true, so reverse charge could not trigger for anybody - and every EU business customer was invoiced Austrian VAT they cannot reclaim in their own country, which is not a pass-through for them but a real cost until the invoice is corrected. The check has THREE outcomes, and the third is why VatIdCheck exists. VIES is a gateway onto twenty-seven national registers and any of them is regularly down. Reading "I could not ask" as "not registered" would clear a verification that has stood for months, move that customer onto the domestic rate, and change what their next invoice says - because a register was asleep. Reading it as "registered" would put reverse charge on an unchecked number, which is our liability. So on UNAVAILABLE nothing at all is written. Asked at the moment the number is entered, because that is when somebody is looking at the field and can fix a typo. The save has already happened by then and the check cannot undo it: a register that is down must not cost a customer their address change. Shape and membership are refused before a request is spent, and the fake refuses on the same rule as the real verifier. A fake that answers where VIES would never have been asked is not a simplification but a different product, and free text normalises into a well-formed number more easily than it looks - "not a number" becomes NOTANUMBER, which the shape rule alone reads as a Norwegian one. clupilot:verify-vat-ids re-asks about the numbers reverse charge rests on, since a registration can be withdrawn. Deliberately not scheduled: it queries a public service with a concurrency limit on behalf of somebody else's tax position, and the cadence is the owner's to set. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 22:42:29 +02:00
nexxo	6d7c2bdf35	Ask whether they are a consumer, and let one change their mind ... Three things the product owed its customers and did not have. **Who is on the other side.** There was no consumer/business flag anywhere, and `vat_id` was standing in for one — which it cannot: a business without a VAT number is an ordinary small business, and a consumer with one does not exist. It is asked at sign-up now, correctable in the portal, and NULL where nobody has been asked. Unknown is read as CONSUMER everywhere it decides a right, because that mistake costs us a refund while the other one takes a statutory right away from somebody who has it. Reverse charge asks the recorded type instead of the number: an explicit consumer is charged the domestic rate whatever `vat_id` says — previously they were not, and anyone could zero their own VAT by getting a number verified. An unrecorded type still falls back to the verified number, so no contract that is already running changes rate. **The fourteen-day right of withdrawal** (FAGG, §312g BGB), for consumers only, at every door: the window is stamped on the contract when it is concluded, the customer exercises it from the portal, an operator records one that arrived by telephone or post, and both go through one action that refuses a business customer on the server rather than by hiding a card. The money follows the paperwork rather than being computed beside it. The invoice is cancelled by a Storno with its own gapless number — nothing is ever edited or deleted — a new invoice states the pro-rata value of the service actually delivered (FAGG §16, by days over the term paid for), and the refund is exactly the difference between the two documents. Where the consumer never expressly asked for the service to begin at once, they owe nothing and the whole amount goes back. `StripeClient::refund()` is new, keyed so a retry cannot send the money twice. The service ends through EndInstanceService and the `cancellation_scheduled` machinery that was already there. **The cancel button for modules.** BookAddon::cancelAtPeriodEnd() had no caller in the interface at all, so a customer could book a recurring charge in two clicks and had no way to stop it. It is on the module card now, with the date it runs until and a way back while the cancellation is still pending — and putting a module back settles nothing, because the term it was cancelled for was paid for in advance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 21:06:06 +02:00
nexxo	973fcb3f2d	Replace native confirm() dialogs with the app's own modal pattern	2026-07-28 19:34:27 +02:00
Claude	f6b9181ed8	Give customers two-factor, and stop every button on the settings page reacting at once ... Clicking Save made every button on the console's settings page appear to fire. Seven `wire:loading.attr="disabled"` had no `wire:target`, and without one Livewire applies the loading state to ANY request on the component — so one save put all of them into their disabled state simultaneously. Each names its own action now. Two-factor for customers. Fortify's endpoints already existed; only the screen was missing. Setting up requires re-entering the password first, and every action re-checks that server-side rather than relying on the button not being on screen — a Livewire action is reachable by anyone who can post to /livewire/update. The confirmation marker is Laravel's own session key, so it and the framework's password.confirm middleware mean the same thing rather than drifting apart. The secret never enters a Livewire property. Component state travels to the browser and back in the snapshot; the QR image is derived from the secret, the secret is not in it — and there is a test that says so. The status page moves to the ROOT of its hostname: status.clupilot.com/status says the same word twice. That needed the domain-bound `/` registered BEFORE the landing page, because Laravel takes the first match and the landing route is host-agnostic — so the status host would have served the marketing site. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-27 08:48:34 +02:00
nexxo	df10448e5d	feat(portal): settings page — company profile, branding (logo+colors), cancel package, close account ... - customers gain profile + branding + closed_at; instances gain cancellation fields; branding resolver (NULL -> CluPilot defaults) snapshotted into the provisioning run context - cancel package: term-end, irreversible, typed-confirm modal (R5) - close account: guarded (no active package), typed-confirm modal (R5) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-25 14:36:52 +02:00