7 Commits (v1.3.74)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
nexxo	ff92466b47	Give the order a checkout page, and stop hiding what a year costs ... **There was no checkout page.** The package list posted straight to Stripe, so the last thing a customer saw in this product's design was a grid of cards and the next was somebody else's form asking for a card number. What they were buying, what it costs in total, what happens afterwards and what they were agreeing to were never stated in one place. App\Livewire\Checkout is that place: the package and its figures on the left, a sticky summary on the right — net, the saving where there is one, the setup fee, the tax, what is due today, and what will be charged after it. Every figure comes from the catalogue, TaxTreatment and SetupFee, the same three the checkout itself reads; nothing is recomputed, because a summary that works out its own total is a second answer waiting to disagree with the one Stripe is handed. **The terms acceptance moved to where the money is spent.** It sat at the top of the package list as a condition of LOOKING at prices, with every button dead beneath it. It is a condition of buying, so it is now at the foot of the summary, directly above the button — after the total, which is the order those three things are read in. The package list has no form on it at all now; its buttons are links. **The page used the left half of a 1240px shell.** A 68-character title, a switch under it and an 80-character footnote, beside a grid that used the whole width. Now: a header band with the name left and the term switch right, where a control belongs, and a closing band of three columns instead of a paragraph trailing off. **The yearly view showed the monthly equivalent as its headline**, so on a package with no free months the big figure did not move at all when the switch was thrown — the page looked like it had ignored the click. The headline is the price of the term in the unit it is charged in; what a year works out to per month is said underneath. Same on the public sheet. **The switch was unreadable.** `text-on-ink` is not in this palette — the ink pairing is bg-ink/text-bg, as x-ui.button has always had it — so the label kept its inherited grey on a near-black pill. And its shell was rounded-lg with rounded-md options inside: two radius scales, one of them Tailwind's untokenised 6px. One scale now, nested. **The mails drew an empty orange tile.** The mark's ascent lives in an SVG the site loads and a mail cannot — Gmail strips inline SVG, Outlook renders with Word, and this layout carries no image by design. The shape is drawn with a character every mail font has, white on the accent tile, with the whole wordmark beside it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 16:00:08 +02:00
nexxo	fed4acf31c	Accept terms instead of a start date, and fix the sender no server accepts ... **The test mail was rejected: "553 5.7.1 Sender address rejected: not owned by user no-reply@…".** Every purpose mailbox here has its own SMTP account, and a mail server lets an account send only from the address it owns. Mail::to() hands back a pending mail bound to the DEFAULT mailer and sendNow() then ignores the mailer the mailable asked for, so a mail addressed support@ went out over the no-reply@ login. It sends through the mailable's own mailer now, and the cloud-ready preview — the one mailable with no mailbox at all — takes the provisioning mailbox like the real notification does. Writing the test for that found the same bug in production code: **InvoiceMail and OrderConfirmationMail set their From to billing@ and never named a mailer**, so both went out over mail.default's no-reply@ login. On this installation no customer had ever received an invoice mail or an order confirmation; they rendered perfectly, queued without complaint and were refused at the door. MailSenderOwnershipTest now scans for the mismatch: a mail that takes a mailbox From must use that mailbox's mailer. **The box on the order page accepts the terms now**, not an immediate start. It used to carry the whole FAGG §16 sentence, which read like a choice between "now" and "in fourteen days" — and there is no second option. The terms are what regulate the sale, so they had to exist: resources/views/legal/terms.blade.php replaces the placeholder with fourteen sections written from what this software actually does — the delivery, the capacity queue, the full refund on withdrawal, the cancellation at period end, the deletion deadlines. The company data comes from CompanyProfile, so the page and the invoices cannot drift. No availability figure and no liability cap has been invented. No order goes through without it: the button is unusable until the box is ticked and says why, and CheckoutController still refuses server-side — the browser half refuses nothing. The request field is `terms_accepted`; the Stripe metadata key stays `immediate_start`, because a session opened before a deploy is paid after it and the webhook would find nothing under a new name. **"Wird der Account nach fünf Tagen gelöscht?"** Only an unconfirmed one. That was the whole of what we said, so the answer looked like yes. The second rule now exists and is stated: PruneDormantAccounts removes a confirmed account after a year when it never had a package — no customer record at all, which is where every order, contract and seven-year invoice hangs. A fortnight's notice goes out first, once, and `dormant_warned_at` is what permits the deletion: an account whose warning never went out is never removed. Signing in resets the clock, measured off the device rows because users has no last_login_at. Both deadlines are said in the portal settings, on the verification page, and in the terms — each reading the number off the command that enforces it. Also: the wordmark scan matched any element whose text merely BEGINS with the company name, which a paragraph of terms does. It looks for the lockup form now (no whitespace after the tag), which is what it was always about. The seven checkout tests in the parallel session's files were posting the old field name and now post the new one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 15:22:35 +02:00
nexxo	c354ad1463	Make mails readable on a phone, and let an operator look at one ... Three things the owner reported, and one sentence that promised something this product does not do. **The mails had a fixed width.** components/mail/layout.blade.php set width="600" and width:600px, so every phone showed a 600px canvas in a 390px window and one had to scroll sideways to read a sentence. Now the table is width="100%" with max-width:600px — fluid, with 600 as a ceiling rather than a floor. A mail cannot fix this with a media query (Outlook renders with Word and drops <style> blocks), which is why the whole file is inline attributes and why the shrinking has to be built in. Side padding went 40px -> 24px in the layout and in all nine mail views: 40 each side leaves 278px of a 390px screen to read in. **There was no way to look at a mail.** An invoice mail needs an invoice, a maintenance announcement needs a window, and "register an account to see whether the confirmation reads well" is not a workflow — which is how the fixed width survived for months. App\Services\Mail\MailPreviews builds all nine from sample data, every record with make() and never create(), so a preview leaves no invoice, order or window behind and draws no number from a series. Two ways to see one: in a tab as the document itself, or sent to the signed-in operator's own address. There is no recipient field — that would be a form for mailing strangers. sendNow(), not send(): every mailable here implements ShouldQueue, and send() defers to the queue for those, which would have put a failure in a worker's log while the button reported success to somebody waiting for the mail. The test caught that. **The booking page had no shell.** Order declared layouts.portal — the bare shell the sign-in pages use, no navigation and no padding — so the page sat flush against the top and bottom of the window with no way back to anything. layouts.portal-app, like every other portal page. **The consent box said something untrue.** Its refusal read "otherwise we can only build your cloud once the withdrawal period has ended", which describes a path that does not exist: nothing here delivers fourteen days later, and an unticked box simply means no order. Said plainly now, and said on the page before somebody runs into the refusal. Also: GrantedPlanPortalTest asserted assertDontSee('179'), which matches any id containing those digits — and ids climb through a suite run because a rolled-back transaction does not reset an auto-increment counter. It passed alone and failed in company. Asserts on '179,00' now, which is what a leaked price would actually look like. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 14:50:37 +02:00
nexxo	3e7026407b	Stop inventing a package, and rebuild the booking page ... Two pages said opposite things about one account, straight after registering: the dashboard said "noch keine Instanz", and Paket & Addons said "AKTUELLES PAKET Start — Status Aktiv". The dashboard was right. The package page fell back to `$instance?->plan ?? 'start'` and rendered that fallback as a contract the customer had entered into, complete with a status of Aktiv, on the one page somebody opens to find out what they pay. The contract is resolved from the CUSTOMER now, not from the instance — a paid order parked for want of a machine has a subscription and no instance yet, and asking the instance would tell somebody who has paid that they have no package. An instance counts as well, whatever its subscription row says. With neither, the page says so and points at the booking page: an "Upgrade" from nothing is a purchase, and that has its own page. The cart stays outside that gate. A customer can have something in it before they have any contract at all, and hiding it there would hide the thing they came to pay for — which is what my first version did, and seven existing tests said so. And the booking page. Five cards in a four-column grid left the fifth alone on its own row, reading as a mistake; the consent box sat at the BOTTOM with every buy button disabled until it was ticked, so the page arrived looking broken before anybody had done anything wrong; and the price ran across the card in one block with nothing to compare. Now the consent comes first, because it is the condition for everything under it, and it colours itself green once given. Three columns, so five plans read as 3 + 2. Each card is the same four rows in the same order — price, delivery, what you get, the button — so the eye can run across a row and compare like with like. The button stays ENABLED with the reason it will not go through said under it: a disabled control explains nothing, and the server is the gate either way. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-30 14:29:22 +02:00
nexxo	e0c109c449	Ask for the express request to begin, and send it to Stripe ... The withdrawal machinery has always read `immediate_start` off the checkout session's metadata — StripeWebhookController stamps `immediate_start_consent_at` from it, WithdrawalRight refunds pro rata when it is there and in full when it is not. The checkout never put it there. So every contract concluded through this application carried no consent, and a withdrawal on day thirteen of a running cloud took back the whole amount however many days the machine had run. That is the lawful outcome without the consent, and it was the only outcome available. Now the checkout asks. The box is required — validated `accepted`, not `present`, because an empty field is what an unticked checkbox sends and a consent that can be produced by leaving something blank is not a consent — and the metadata carries exactly the string '1' the webhook compares against. One box for the page rather than one per card: the sentence is the statutory wording and four copies of it is a wall nobody reads. The forms carry it as a hidden field bound to that box, and the buy buttons stay disabled until it is ticked. With JavaScript off the field arrives empty and the server refuses with the sentence explaining why — the safe direction to fail in. Ticking a box in a browser was never the record anyway: the record is the timestamp taken when the payment lands. Tested at both seams and along the whole chain: refused without it, refused for '', '0' and a word that is not yes, carried to Stripe as '1', and a webhook carrying it lands as a timestamp on the order while one without it lands as null. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 21:19:03 +02:00
nexxo	6b8412f0c3	Write an invoice for work that came off no price list ... Not everything we are paid for is a package. Somebody asks whether their data can be moved into Nextcloud; we look at it, we say what it costs, we do it. That is a real invoice with no order and no contract behind it, and the only way to produce one was to write it somewhere else — which puts it outside the series. A numbered series with a document missing from it is worth nothing at an audit. So it goes through the same door as every other invoice: IssueInvoice::forService() draws from the same series and therefore the same consecutive number, applies the same TaxTreatment (a verified business in another member state gets its reverse charge and the note that makes a zero-rated document lawful), freezes the same immutable snapshot and dispatches the same archive jobs. The page under Rechnungen writes what the operator typed and nothing else. Amounts are in euro because it is a form — 12,95 becomes 1295 by round(), not by a cast that would make it 1294 — and quantities go to a thousandth because hours are billed in quarters. The total beside the lines is the same InvoiceMath the document uses; a preview doing its own arithmetic would be a second answer, and the first one anybody notices differs is on a document that cannot be changed. There is no draft: a "save as draft" that draws a number is an issued invoice with a friendlier name. The website's buy buttons go to the sign-in now, not to /order. Booking belongs in the panel, where the account exists and its address has been confirmed — which matters because that address is where the finished cloud's credentials are sent. Sending an anonymous visitor at a page behind auth worked, but only via a middleware bounce off a page they never asked for. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 20:12:26 +02:00
nexxo	f85f57152e	Let the customer buy it themselves, and tab the integrations page ... Every path on the site ended in "anfragen": a mailto: link and a promise to answer the same working day. That is an afternoon of somebody's time per customer, for a product whose whole point is that the machine does the work — and it scales exactly as far as one inbox does. Now: sign in, pick a package, pay, and provisioning starts by itself. The pieces were already there — Stripe holds a Price per plan version (the catalogue sync writes the ids), the webhook opens the contract, the pipeline builds the VM — and what was missing was the checkout session between them. CheckoutController opens one and gets out of the way; the purchase becomes real on the webhook, which stays the only place allowed to believe a payment happened. The success URL is a redirect target and therefore a URL anybody can type, so it says "we are building it", not "you have paid". Nothing in the request may decide the price. The plan key arrives from a form and everything else is re-derived from the catalogue, including the plan VERSION, so a version published while the customer types their card number cannot change what they were quoted. Two cases that are not errors: no capacity is a parked order (already built), and an existing customer is sent to the plan change rather than sold a second, empty cloud that bills twice. The site says what it can keep. "danach wissen Sie … wie Ihre Daten sicher umziehen" was a promise made before seeing the thing it is about: we do not know where a visitor's data is, what shape it is in, or whether it can be moved at all. Migration is named as its own question, looked at first and quoted afterwards. The integrations page gets the settings page's treatment for the same reason: it was one narrow column of six cards, so an operator connecting DNS scrolled past Stripe to reach it and the raw .env editor sat at the bottom of everything. Three tabs by what a section is FOR — services we buy from outside, our own machines, the file underneath — the same axis the page was rebuilt around when it stopped being split by storage mechanism. The tab is in the query string; unlocking survives a switch, because a confirmed password is a session fact and not a property of a tab. The .env tab is Owner-only, like the editor it holds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 19:42:28 +02:00