Three things the owner reported, and one sentence that promised something
this product does not do.
**The mails had a fixed width.** components/mail/layout.blade.php set
width="600" and width:600px, so every phone showed a 600px canvas in a
390px window and one had to scroll sideways to read a sentence. Now the
table is width="100%" with max-width:600px — fluid, with 600 as a ceiling
rather than a floor. A mail cannot fix this with a media query (Outlook
renders with Word and drops <style> blocks), which is why the whole file
is inline attributes and why the shrinking has to be built in. Side
padding went 40px -> 24px in the layout and in all nine mail views:
40 each side leaves 278px of a 390px screen to read in.
**There was no way to look at a mail.** An invoice mail needs an invoice,
a maintenance announcement needs a window, and "register an account to
see whether the confirmation reads well" is not a workflow — which is how
the fixed width survived for months. App\Services\Mail\MailPreviews
builds all nine from sample data, every record with make() and never
create(), so a preview leaves no invoice, order or window behind and
draws no number from a series. Two ways to see one: in a tab as the
document itself, or sent to the signed-in operator's own address. There
is no recipient field — that would be a form for mailing strangers.
sendNow(), not send(): every mailable here implements ShouldQueue, and
send() defers to the queue for those, which would have put a failure in a
worker's log while the button reported success to somebody waiting for
the mail. The test caught that.
**The booking page had no shell.** Order declared layouts.portal — the
bare shell the sign-in pages use, no navigation and no padding — so the
page sat flush against the top and bottom of the window with no way back
to anything. layouts.portal-app, like every other portal page.
**The consent box said something untrue.** Its refusal read "otherwise we
can only build your cloud once the withdrawal period has ended", which
describes a path that does not exist: nothing here delivers fourteen days
later, and an unticked box simply means no order. Said plainly now, and
said on the page before somebody runs into the refusal.
Also: GrantedPlanPortalTest asserted assertDontSee('179'), which matches
any id containing those digits — and ids climb through a suite run
because a rolled-back transaction does not reset an auto-increment
counter. It passed alone and failed in company. Asserts on '179,00' now,
which is what a leaked price would actually look like.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
c354ad1463