889b401faf
The capacity park could not survive its own first poll. ReserveResources
polls every 120 s and declared a maxDuration of 60, and RunRunner measures
a step's budget from a started_at it deliberately does not reset on a poll
— so every re-entry was ruled timed out before the body ran, a timeout
consumes an attempt, and five of them failed a paid order in about six
minutes. The fourteen-day promise, the console's capacity queue and the
"go and buy a server" workflow were unreachable code. maxDuration is now
the whole park plus one poll interval, and a test drives a park through
the runner rather than calling execute() directly, which is why this was
invisible.
Every guest occ call ran as root. `docker compose exec` defaults to root
and the Nextcloud image's console.php exits 1 unless the caller owns
config/config.php, so all five call sites were failing on every instance.
There is now one builder, App\Support\NextcloudOcc, and a test refuses a
second: nothing in app/ may spell the invocation out by hand. deploy/
update.sh had learned this for our own container and nobody carried it
across.
RunAcceptanceChecks was terminal on the first no. certReachable() answers
false for a connect timeout as readily as for a missing certificate, so
one bad second ended a finished, certified Nextcloud as a failed order
with the instance released. The probes retry now and the run still fails
for good with the probe's own reason once the budget is spent; the two
facts a retry cannot change stay terminal.
The in-flight guard asked whether anything was running, not whether it
would do the work. App\Provisioning\WorkInFlight asks the second question,
reading the step lists the runner executes: a domain proven during a
restart is routed, and a storage pack booked during an address run is
delivered instead of charged monthly and forgotten.
The address pipeline ran its steps in the wrong order for the direction it
exists for. Nextcloud before the router in `address` and `plan-change`, as
in `customer`, because a run that got the certificate and then failed left
the customer's own domain serving an untrusted-domain error under a valid
certificate while the portal called it live. Safe in both directions; the
reasoning is written above the pipeline.
A stale guest_ip could never be corrected. ConfigureDnsAndTls compared the
hostnames but never the backend, and nothing re-read the address after the
build. It now records and compares `routed_backend`, and ConfigureNetwork
joins the `restart` pipeline — a cold boot is what moves a DHCP lease — and
asks for the address to be re-applied when the guest has actually moved.
Also: HetznerDnsClient::upsertRecord read only the first page of a zone
that pages at 100, so past a hundred records it created a second A record
for the same name and the cloud was up about half the time; the console's
retry left a live customer's order in `provisioning` for ever for any
maintenance pipeline; and a revived run's first pass burned an attempt on a
timeout that had already happened, because the clause written for it used
`??=`.
Seven test sites wrote config('provisioning.plans.*'), a key that has not
existed since the catalogue moved into the database. Every write was a
no-op, so each test proved something other than its name: the missing
template, the two snapshot regressions and the grandfathered-price scenario
are now actually constructed, ValidateOrder's reasons are asserted rather
than only its type, and the end-to-end run checks that the quota step
delivered something.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .gitea/workflows | ||
| .npm | ||
| app | ||
| bin | ||
| bootstrap | ||
| config | ||
| database | ||
| deploy | ||
| docker | ||
| docs | ||
| lang | ||
| public | ||
| resources | ||
| routes | ||
| storage | ||
| tests | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .editorconfig | ||
| .env.example | ||
| .gitattributes | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .npmrc | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| VERSION | ||
| artisan | ||
| composer.json | ||
| composer.lock | ||
| docker-compose.yml | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| package.json | ||
| phpunit.xml | ||
| postcss.config.js | ||
| tailwind.config.js | ||
| vite.config.js | ||
README.md
About Laravel
Laravel is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable and creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Laravel takes the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in many web projects, such as:
- Simple, fast routing engine.
- Powerful dependency injection container.
- Multiple back-ends for session and cache storage.
- Expressive, intuitive database ORM.
- Database agnostic schema migrations.
- Robust background job processing.
- Real-time event broadcasting.
Laravel is accessible, powerful, and provides tools required for large, robust applications.
Learning Laravel
Laravel has the most extensive and thorough documentation and video tutorial library of all modern web application frameworks, making it a breeze to get started with the framework.
In addition, Laracasts contains thousands of video tutorials on a range of topics including Laravel, modern PHP, unit testing, and JavaScript. Boost your skills by digging into our comprehensive video library.
You can also watch bite-sized lessons with real-world projects on Laravel Learn, where you will be guided through building a Laravel application from scratch while learning PHP fundamentals.
Agentic Development
Laravel's predictable structure and conventions make it ideal for AI coding agents like Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot. Install Laravel Boost to supercharge your AI workflow:
composer require laravel/boost --dev
php artisan boost:install
Boost provides your agent 15+ tools and skills that help agents build Laravel applications while following best practices.
Contributing
Thank you for considering contributing to the Laravel framework! The contribution guide can be found in the Laravel documentation.
Code of Conduct
In order to ensure that the Laravel community is welcoming to all, please review and abide by the Code of Conduct.
Security Vulnerabilities
If you discover a security vulnerability within Laravel, please send an e-mail to Taylor Otwell via taylor@laravel.com. All security vulnerabilities will be promptly addressed.
License
The Laravel framework is open-sourced software licensed under the MIT license.