8f2252e81b
Two ways of charging a customer for something they did not get. A downgrade was due when `subscriptions.current_period_end` said so, and Stripe pushes that column forward on every renewal. So a downgrade booked in March was deferred to the end of April by April's renewal, and to the end of May by May's — each time by a whole term, and each time the customer was billed again for the package they had asked to leave. The due date was being re-derived from a moving target on every scheduler tick. It is decided once now, at the moment the customer decides, and stamped onto the contract: `pending_plan` and `pending_effective_at`, the two columns that have been in the schema since the first migration and were written by nothing at all. The shop stamps them, PlanChange reads them instead of the period end when a move is already booked, and clupilot:apply-due-plan-changes finds contracts by the stamped date rather than orders by a date it recomputes. The order stays what it always was — the customer's own record of the request, what the cart shows them and what they remove to change their mind — so it is still consumed with the change, and removing it unbooks the change. What it no longer does is decide when. A second downgrade replaces the first rather than queueing behind it; an upgrade clears one, or it would come due months later and undo the bigger package; a contract cancelled before the date takes the booking with it; and a customer with no contract can no longer place a downgrade at all, which was accepted before and could never be carried out. A booked change is now visible where the contract is read: on the plan card in the portal, because the cart entry disappears when it is paid for and the booking does not, and on the customer row in the console, because that is where an operator answers "what is this customer on". The second defect is the same money in one step: BookAddon guarded duplicates per ORDER — the unique index on (order_id, addon_key) — so two orders for the same module on one contract both went through. A stale tab or a double click bought priority support twice. But storage is deliberately sold in packs, and AddonCatalogue sums the quantities for exactly that reason, so "refuse the second" is only right for some of them. Which is which is declared beside each price in config/provisioning.php (`sold_as`), because it is a commercial decision about each module and not something to infer from a key: storage is a quantity; off-site backups are on or off, support is prioritised or it is not, Collabora Pro is one licence, and a machine answers to one own domain. An undeclared module counts as an entitlement — the cheaper of the two mistakes — and a test refuses to let one ship undeclared. Enforced in the action, where the portal, the console's grant screen and a webhook all pass, with the sentence the customer is shown rather than a developer's. A retried webhook for the SAME order still gets its one booking back; that is one purchase arriving twice, not two purchases. The portal stops offering what would be refused — booked, or already waiting in the cart — and goes on offering the pack. What is missing is on the Stripe side and is not invented here: nothing moves the subscription's item onto the new Price, so the renewal after a plan change still bills the old plan at Stripe. StripeClient only creates and archives catalogue objects, and swapping a price also needs the subscription ITEM id, which nothing stores. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .gitea/workflows | ||
| .npm | ||
| app | ||
| bin | ||
| bootstrap | ||
| config | ||
| database | ||
| deploy | ||
| docker | ||
| docs | ||
| lang | ||
| public | ||
| resources | ||
| routes | ||
| storage | ||
| tests | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .editorconfig | ||
| .env.example | ||
| .gitattributes | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .npmrc | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| VERSION | ||
| artisan | ||
| composer.json | ||
| composer.lock | ||
| docker-compose.yml | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| package.json | ||
| phpunit.xml | ||
| postcss.config.js | ||
| tailwind.config.js | ||
| vite.config.js | ||
README.md
About Laravel
Laravel is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable and creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Laravel takes the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in many web projects, such as:
- Simple, fast routing engine.
- Powerful dependency injection container.
- Multiple back-ends for session and cache storage.
- Expressive, intuitive database ORM.
- Database agnostic schema migrations.
- Robust background job processing.
- Real-time event broadcasting.
Laravel is accessible, powerful, and provides tools required for large, robust applications.
Learning Laravel
Laravel has the most extensive and thorough documentation and video tutorial library of all modern web application frameworks, making it a breeze to get started with the framework.
In addition, Laracasts contains thousands of video tutorials on a range of topics including Laravel, modern PHP, unit testing, and JavaScript. Boost your skills by digging into our comprehensive video library.
You can also watch bite-sized lessons with real-world projects on Laravel Learn, where you will be guided through building a Laravel application from scratch while learning PHP fundamentals.
Agentic Development
Laravel's predictable structure and conventions make it ideal for AI coding agents like Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot. Install Laravel Boost to supercharge your AI workflow:
composer require laravel/boost --dev
php artisan boost:install
Boost provides your agent 15+ tools and skills that help agents build Laravel applications while following best practices.
Contributing
Thank you for considering contributing to the Laravel framework! The contribution guide can be found in the Laravel documentation.
Code of Conduct
In order to ensure that the Laravel community is welcoming to all, please review and abide by the Code of Conduct.
Security Vulnerabilities
If you discover a security vulnerability within Laravel, please send an e-mail to Taylor Otwell via taylor@laravel.com. All security vulnerabilities will be promptly addressed.
License
The Laravel framework is open-sourced software licensed under the MIT license.