f02e86769b
tests / pest (push) Failing after 9m21s
Details
tests / assets (push) Successful in 21s
Details
tests / release (push) Has been skipped
Details
Stripe was charging the catalogue's NET figure while the document added the domestic rate on top: a customer quoted 214,80 paid 179,00 and was then invoiced for VAT nobody had collected. Under para 11(12) UStG that VAT is owed to the tax office whether or not it ever arrived, so every document issued created a liability against revenue that did not contain it. The Stripe Price now carries the GROSS figure. price_cents stays net - it is frozen onto every contract and PlanChange prorates against it, so redefining it would corrupt every pro-rata sum ever computed. Only the amount at the till moved, and it is formed by the one call TaxTreatment already answers for the price sheet and for the invoice, so displayed, charged and invoiced cannot drift apart. Stripe's automatic_tax is deliberately not used. TaxTreatment is the single tax authority here, and a second rate computed by Stripe would take 19 % from a German consumer while our document said 20 %. A Stripe Price cannot be edited, so a changed figure means a new Price and the old one archived - which stops it being SOLD and leaves every subscription already on it billing the old amount for ever. stripe:reprice-subscriptions is the second half, and a command of its own because it touches live money. A withdrawing consumer is refunded in full, as the owner decided. That is more generous than FAGG para 16 requires, and it makes the express-request consent the statute hinges on irrelevant - so the gate is gone rather than left looking load-bearing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| de | ||
| en | ||